Take It In Blood
Banned
Lebron is a better point guard than Curry
A good general rule is the opposite of whatever sludge tumbles out of your brain on a given subject.And what's objective to you?
It's a joke to folks who'll be on the wrong side of history, which you should know all about.What a joke
And MVP isn't a narrative-based award? I just explained why Isiah doesn't have one despite having the Pistons as the best team in the league for 4 years straight, the media hated him and so did other players around the leagueNah, what's really retarded is actually believing that a narrative-based award actually means something in the grand scheme of things. Judge the player from what he does on the court, not from an award that's judged by a minute amount of people who view the game through a certain lens.
Currently, where would you rank Curry all time in regard to point guards?And MVP isn't a narrative-based award? I just explained why Isiah doesn't have one despite having the Pistons as the best team in the league for 4 years straight, the media hated him and so did other players around the league
Yes, of course, it is, what's your point?And MVP isn't a narrative-based award? I just explained why Isiah doesn't have one despite having the Pistons as the best team in the league for 4 years straight, the media hated him and so did other players around the league
3rdCurrently, where would you rank Curry all time in regard to point guards?
If people use MVP to rank Curry over Zeke FMVP is fair gameYes, of course, it is, what's your point?
I don't even know if I'd call it "fair game" - FMVP is only based on a minimal amount of games, where matchups become more centralized - which is why I think Playoffs MVP would be a more accurate measurement of performance. Nevertheless, player arguments should be more based on direct performance, skillset, impact, and longevity, rather than any narrative-based accolades.If people use MVP to rank Curry over Zeke FMVP is fair game