Nigerian Boxer Who Bragged About Being "Pure African" & Not Arriving On A Ship Gets His Karma

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
48,233
Reputation
14,635
Daps
179,953
AA are some of the most genetically superior people on the planet. We produce world class athletes in droves.

We are also some of the riches peoples in the diaspora. It kills me when other "Black" people shyt on us like we aren’t light years ahead of them in many ways.

The day AA get their diets and family dynamics together the world will move

:wow::wow:
 

GodinDaFlesh

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Feb 4, 2015
Messages
12,846
Reputation
1,369
Daps
69,286
Reppin
The Godverse
1st he acts like the world has a positive opinion of Africans. They don't. Second if he's an immigrant and fleeing his country for a better situation, he shouldn't be acting so proud. Nigeria is a third world country.
People keep making this dumbass argument, sorry I have to call it out. You can be proud of where you come from but still not fukk with government that keeps it's people down, the two aren't mutually exclusive. Same way ADOS is proud of it's people but hate the American system that has kept them down for centuries. Or being proud of the hood you grew up in but not want to live there.
 

IGSaint12

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,455
Reputation
2,350
Daps
39,410
Reppin
NULL
People keep making this dumbass argument, sorry I have to call it out. You can be proud of where you come from but still not fukk with government that keeps it's people down, the two aren't mutually exclusive. Same way ADOS is proud of it's people but hate the American system that has kept them down for centuries. Or being proud of the hood you grew up in but not want to live there.

I'm not saying you can't be proud of where you come from but when you use it as a means to look down on someone else or a group of people especially those who grew up in different circumstances then yeah it deserves to be called out.
 

EBK String

Better Ring String
Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
31,368
Reputation
6,585
Daps
306,313
Y'all need to stop comparing us Caribbean brehs to these uppity Nigerian muhfukkas :yeshrug:


And now that I think about it 90% of the ignorant comments directed at the diaspora come from Nigerian muhfukkas, it ain't even all Africans.

you've said some questionable things. Now it makes sense.

:mjpls:
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,891
Reputation
9,531
Daps
81,346
And all this occured during the victorian era in England, Livingston was a missionary sent to Africa by the crown for the sole purpose of furthering the empire's ideals, and his works and adventures were questioned by many legit anthropologists in his day. Eugenics was also a result of that period, and so was the anti-eugenics movement. The very same British scientists who advocated for Eugenics(their measure of superiority was based on cultural practices and norms, not a permanent fixture as race) were appaled at the extreme racial twist scientists in the US gave the studies in the early 20th century and started to dismiss it. In the new world, racial superiority of whites was already so embedded in everyday culture such that eugenics was to be viewed solely via racial lenses.

Also, racial superiority by Europeans was always an argument they had, from the common man to the academic, despite that, anthropolgical studies have always been going on in Africa regardless and there has always been interest. From Jauma Ferrer to Mungo Park, extremely biased findings started during the height of victorian britain due to colonial interests, and met some resistance still during those times.

...there was anthro studies being done but not in good faith: these white people were out to whitewash anything in "black africa" that looked impressive and reduce all the other "black african" history to that of savages







The+naturalism+of+Ife+sculpture+continued+to+lead+many+20th+Century+Europeans+to+question+whether+it+was+from+African+because+it+went+against+all+of+their+assertions+to+the+primitive+aspect+of+African+art.+They+suggested+in+was+made+by+those+from+the+Lost+City+of+Atlantis%2C+or+that+it+had+to+have+been+influenced+by+ancient+Greece+or+Renaissance+Europe..jpg

.
.

it wasn't until ADOS started challenging them/africana studies made it a goal to teach TRUE black/black african history, did white american/euros change their tune


These clowns don't realize that if it wasn't for push back against Eurocentricity in Africa by both Black scholars and opened minded non-blacks in acedemia than much of Africa outside of hunter-gatherers would have been EURASIANIZED. They keep screaming "why you focus on Egypt so much!!!!" yet allow Whites/Non-Blacks to Eurasionize it on some "yes massa! We stays in West Africa wre wez belongz. Wez wont be bad negros!" I said many times its MUCH bigger than Egypt! After Egypt they want to Eurasionize ALL of Northeast Africa(especially the Sudan and Horn). After Northeast Africa who knows what else???? I mean they already had studies like this that were luckly debunked.
Error found in study of first ancient African genome

You would never hear a British man say STOP focusing on Ancient Greece! While allowing radical negros to claim it. These guys will WILLFULLY give up the entire North African history and East Africa. That ain't happening with me.

Egyptian confirms Egypt is majority black, don't let these cacs get you fooled


8djWbGY.jpg



npjCyAN.jpg


^^the era before an offcial black studies program/curriculum, of Adosian scholars challenging white views of Africa. Below is the era of the official creation of said studies programs

FrAbwVN.jpg


zNfNU5e.jpg


as they would then spread to africa

OQhC1K2.jpg


and into europe


uNZJ2Qr.jpg



VYjIXGY.jpg





eZc6018.jpg




5HiEI4X.jpg
 
Last edited:

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
16,529
Reputation
3,352
Daps
54,230
Reppin
CALI
i gotta reply to this post again

breh aframs defended africa for hundreds of years just to justify our own humanity

when the entire WEST placed an indictment on the "negroid race" it was aframs defending west Africa and its cultural existence :mindblown:
And they will still claim that's its African Americans who are being divisive, yet go out of their way to clarify that we are not the same people.
 

Swahili P'Bitek

Absorbingpovertywithoutlimitations
Joined
Jan 16, 2018
Messages
1,366
Reputation
450
Daps
3,545
Reppin
Mtaani
...there was anthro studies being done but not in good faith: these white people were out to whitewash anything in "black africa" that looked impressive and reduce all the other "black african" history to that of savages







The+naturalism+of+Ife+sculpture+continued+to+lead+many+20th+Century+Europeans+to+question+whether+it+was+from+African+because+it+went+against+all+of+their+assertions+to+the+primitive+aspect+of+African+art.+They+suggested+in+was+made+by+those+from+the+Lost+City+of+Atlantis%2C+or+that+it+had+to+have+been+influenced+by+ancient+Greece+or+Renaissance+Europe..jpg

.
.

it wasn't until ADOS started challenging them/africana studies made it a goal to teach TRUE black/black african history, did white american/euros change their tune




Egyptian confirms Egypt is majority black, don't let these cacs get you fooled


8djWbGY.jpg



npjCyAN.jpg


^^the era before an offcial black studies program/curriculum, of Adosian scholars challenging white views of Africa. Below is the era of the official creation of said studies programs

FrAbwVN.jpg


zNfNU5e.jpg


as they would then spread to africa

OQhC1K2.jpg


and into europe


uNZJ2Qr.jpg



VYjIXGY.jpg





eZc6018.jpg




5HiEI4X.jpg

Yet all this happened starting from the 1850s onwards, African anthropology is divided into phases and changed according to what was happening in Europe in relation to Africa, read explorer journals done during the age of exploration(pre-atlantic slavery), then during the trans-atlantic slavery, during abolition, and then when colonialism became an economic need in europe, then post colonialism. All these have varying angles.

Impartial journals by Europeans are what even brought attention to the empires existent in Africa and their social organizations. During the slave trade, the narrative took a twist again, then during abolition in Europe(notice USA required a war to bring an end to slavery) then during colonialism, the accounts of unbiased explorers started being disregarded again, and this view, together with the pre-abolition perception of Africa maintained in the Americas due to the slave trade forced anthropologists to challenge this narrative. So, did African Americans play a role in rejuvenating unbiased anthropolgical research in Africa during the scramble of Africa and during colonialism, yes, had there been unbiased works done by explorers in Africa prior to this, also yes. Things aren't always linear.
 
Top