Nicki Minaj comes out as an anti-vaxxer.

[Neil Tyson]

I don't have a reply button for that thread.

Sure. I ran. I just gathered my courage to finally respond today. Ok bro

Coli nikkas are wild. Corny asf. I don't mind being wrong. Just read your fact checking articles next time, ok?

Posting a link to snopes without context isn't the W you think it is

You sound like very much mind being wrong.

Replying "Ok" like a passive aggressive ho.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Addressing Dr. Christina Parks’s Claims — Deplatform Disease

There is presently a viral video circulating featuring the testimony of Dr. Christina Parks regarding COVID-19 vaccines and mandating them. In this video, she makes a number of blatantly false claims or prevaricates and they are worth going through in detail. Parks recycles a few of her points so this is mostly chronological but if she returned to a particular subject I discuss it in the same section rather than mentioning it a second time.

 

[Imlinkin]

Christina parks is a self hating MAGA c00n. She is borderline QANON going from her FB page

I haven't looked up the other guy yet.

The genetic fallacy is one of the coli's favorite logical fallacies.

Logically speaking, it's best to address the claim or argument being made instead of debunking it based on the source. The fact that someone smokes crack doesn't even bar them from telling the truth or presenting an accurate argument. A broken clock is right twice a day

 

[Megadeus]

Show me where you made that distinction.

I didnt. Its clearly implicit in the comment. Peep how I didnt say "all" or "in totality"?

MOST ppl dont do extensive research on what is prescribed to them on average. Thats a fact whether you like it or not. Whether youre an Antivaxxer or not. That fact is irrefutable and is what my point is based off of. Common knowledge. The masses. Not you or your Facebook followers, or whoever's timeline.

What you miss is, the (potentially dumb) anti vaxxers on your fb/ Twitter timeline only represent you, not the totality of anti vaxxers. If you only know/ follow dumb ppl, your timeline will reflect that.

Im not even on social media so idk what youre even raving about. Nobody said anything about fb/twitter timelines.

Don't put that on me, those your ppl. My skepticism is well-sourced.

but I didnt. Youre the one who quoted ME first with your life story, like that somehow disproves what I had said

You keep trying to make this about yourself for some reason. Its irrelevant to my comments made, and my point still stands.

You coulda said your peace without quoting me tbh.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

Yall gotta stop lying to make a point. I was RAISED reading all the inserts. I never in my life took a prescription just bc it was prescribed. fukk them.

Babe if everything you say is true, you're the exception not the norm.

Most ppl aint living like you.

So yes, the rest of these ppl claiming to do their research are indeed dummies.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

The genetic fallacy is one of the coli's favorite logical fallacies.

Logically speaking, it's best to address the claim or argument being made instead of debunking it based on the source. The fact that someone smokes crack doesn't even bar them from telling the truth or presenting an accurate argument. A broken clock is right twice a day

Not the same thing when MAGA ppl have wholly gone insane, believing that covid was a hoax, telling ppl don't wear masks, believing that the election was stolen, believing that lizard ppl are around us. These ppl are insane maniacs being led by an insane man.

Yes in their case we MUST examine the source.

They are devoid of reason.

 

[Numpsay]

Nicki having fun with this shyt today. I'm dying

 

[Sad Bunny]

Nicki having fun with this shyt today. I'm dying

 

[Artificial Intelligence]

.......................

 

[Theodoresolderbreh]

Why do people always say 'trust the experts' when there is an opposing side of accredited and well respected doctors who aren't in favor of the covid vax or the move to mass vaccinate at this time?



Dr. Christina Parks is against any sort of mandated
vaccinations. She's not a quack.



Nobel Prize Winning Dr. Luc Montagnier said that vaccinating during a pandemic would create variants and now you can't Google his name without being brought to a 'fact checking' site basically calling him untrustworthy when he's one of the most cited doctors in the world:






The list goes on and on. You 'trust the experts' cats are intellectually dishonest

first thing that popped for me when i googled her name https://www.healthandsciencefacts.c...arks-viral-rant-on-tdap-and-covid-19-vaccines Everything she said in that video was straight up lies so she either is a quack or a grifter just like andrew wakefield, who was also an dr turned anti vaccine grifter before having his license stripped.

 

[hex]

first thing that popped for me when i googled her name https://www.healthandsciencefacts.c...arks-viral-rant-on-tdap-and-covid-19-vaccines Everything she said in that video was straight up lies so she either she is a quack or a grifter just like andrew wakefield. who was also an dr turned anti vaccine grifter before having his license stripped.

Exactly.
Cats be in here lying their asses off like we ain't got Google.

Christina Parks:

Hearing over Michigan bill to ban vaccine, mask mandates filled with misinformation, conspiracy theories, outright lies

Among the speakers were several known anti-vaccine doctors, including Dr. Christina Parks -- a Ph.D. who pushes debunked theories about vaccines causing autism and the benefits of hydroxichlorquine.

Dr. Luc Montagnier:

Luc Montagnier - Wikipedia

A 12 January 2011 New Scientist editorial described the controversial nature of the research, while also noting how many researchers "reacted with disbelief", with Gary Schuster comparing it to "pathological science."[29] biologist PZ Myers also described it as "pathological science." He described the paper as "one of the more unprofessional write-ups I've ever run across", and criticized the publication process as having an "unbelievable turnaround" time: "another suspicious sign are the dates. This paper was submitted on 3 January 2009, revised on 5 January 2009, and accepted on 6 January 2009", leading him to ask: "Who reviewed this, the author's mother? Maybe someone even closer. Guess who the chairman of the editorial board is: Luc Montagnier".

Dude was such a laughing stock in the scientific community that he had to run to China to continue his career.

Fred.

 

[IAMDetroit]

says you? because you the expert?

No dummy.
Says precedent.
That's less than a year.
There's cancer meds still not approved after 20 years
Clinical trials are rarely completed entirely in 3-4 years, let alone 1.
Shut up. Don't quote me.

 

[Theodoresolderbreh]

No dummy.
Says precedent.
That's less than a year.
There's cancer meds still not approved after 20 years
Clinical trials are rarely completed entirely in 3-4 years, let alone 1.
Shut up. Don't quote me.

Cancer meds and vaccines aren't the same thing. vaccines dont fight cancer you cant compare the two. also you're not a doctor you're a p*ssy on a forum scared to listen to a doctor and the shot because you read a post on facebook you believe

 

[itsyoung!!]

Why do people always say 'trust the experts' when there is an opposing side of accredited and well respected doctors who aren't in favor of the covid vax or the move to mass vaccinate at this time?



Dr. Christina Parks is against any sort of mandated
vaccinations. She's not a quack.



Nobel Prize Winning Dr. Luc Montagnier said that vaccinating during a pandemic would create variants and now you can't Google his name without being brought to a 'fact checking' site basically calling him untrustworthy when he's one of the most cited doctors in the world:






The list goes on and on. You 'trust the experts' cats are intellectually dishonest

Where does Christina Parks administer medicine again?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Why do people always say 'trust the experts' when there is an opposing side of accredited and well respected doctors who aren't in favor of the covid vax or the move to mass vaccinate at this time?

Because out of the tens of thousands of "experts" in-favor of the vaccines, YOU choose to listen to the hundred or so that disagree due to philosophical, not FACTUAL or scientific, reasoning.​