we can break down their interactions with all other races beginning in just the year 1600.
we can break down their interactions with each other since 1000. we don't even need to focus on them as a race.
we can break down each nationality (american, french, german, belgian, spanish, british) and their destructive history, both with each other, and other groups, taken from their history books. would that still be considered racist?
we can point out Leopold, the lgbt mass murderer of the Congolese people (whose descendants wound up murdering Lumumba, one of the rare african nationalists.)
we can point to the Clinton administration and the UNs support of the Rwandan crisis, all to maintain a stranglehold on rare earth minerals.
We can point to the Spanish and their barbaric escapades all over the Americas.
We can point to the British and their global empire built off the blood and bodies of non white people.
we could go on and on about Europes animalistic history, using only their books.
We can talk about how Russia murdered millions of it's own citizens with its scorched earth policy during WW2.
We can point to the Germans mass murdering gypsys, africans, and "semites" during ww2.
we can point out how the cia waged black wars in Cambodia, Indonesia, and various south asian countries where they propped up death squads to kill millions of dark asians (under the guise of 'fighting leftists') during the 50s, 60s and 70s.
we can point to the genetically modified foods, the poor living conditions, the dissemination of various drugs and viruses used to conduct a soft genocide on black people.
can we point out a single equivalent event that any other race has inflicted on them, let alone others (besides maybe the chinese and arabs, which is arguable)?
