Goatpoacher
Superstar
what's so hard to comprehend?
You didn't really convey your point. if your point was to criticize the statement in your title, then you should have indicated as much by, e.g., sticking the title in quotes.
NFL will be safer in the future with improving Helmet Technology
- Thread starter gho3st
- Start date
You didn't really convey your point. if your point was to criticize the statement in your title, then you should have indicated as much by, e.g., sticking the title in quotes.
nineteeneightysix
Banned
The defensive player probably doesn't know how to tackle my the proper way...
You don't tackle with your head....
Goatpoacher
Superstar
Are you fukking stupid? I'm not attacking grammar. I'm questioning his ability to convey a point.
And what's wrong with writing "you are" instead of "you're"?
After watching that Will Smith joint there aint no technology that can prevent brain injuries
The skull aint got anything inside that shyt to keep the brain from swirling around inside of it
fukked up
But it is what it is
Only way to truly "possibly" prevent CTE is have these guys play flag football
The skull aint got anything inside that shyt to keep the brain from swirling around inside of it
fukked up
But it is what it is
Only way to truly "possibly" prevent CTE is have these guys play flag football
no stupid, the idea that it is impossible for football to be safe is supposed to be implicit.
The title is meant to be sarcastic. It aint my fault your ass took it literally.
You're not attacking grammar, just the brehs ability to write. At the same time you're calling me fukking stupid for correcting your ability to convey a point. If you don't know the difference head back to 5th grade.Are you fukking stupid? I'm not attacking grammar. I'm questioning his ability to convey a point.
And what's wrong with writing "you are" instead of "you're"?
Goatpoacher
Superstar
So you are saying that I did not convey my point because I failed to use a contraction? Who says weed isn't a dangerous drug.
Goatpoacher
Superstar
no stupid, the idea that it is impossible for football to be safe is supposed to be implicit.
The title is meant to be sarcastic. It aint my fault your ass took it literally.
That's why I would suggest putting it in quotes to allow the user to understand the title is not your position.
No because then it would be just like using
smiley which i didn't. I specifically asked the question: If we get to the point where Helmet don't break under that type of force, think about what would be going on inside the the fukking skull? .how much more obvious can i make it? 
Last edited:
Goatpoacher
Superstar
No because then it would be just like using
This is where reading is fundamental. You never established a foundation that NFL helmets are going to be more rigid. In fact, you said nothing about how NFL helmets are going to be designed at all. You took an isolated incident, made a baseless assumption, then posted a title which you may or may not agree with.. you are still unclear on that point as well.
Just add the quotes you stubborn bytch.
PortCityProphet
Follow me to the truth
There are no concussion proof helmets. The brain is basically floating inside your skull it moves around. Helmet doesn't protect inside of your skull.
