Whatever helps you sleep. The person who wrote it is putting their rep on the line. They've reported news on my firm that only people at the firm would know.
if the NFL leaked this they're violating the NDA right
Irrelevant
People instantly believed the $100 million rumor but can't fathom this?
Sounds low, mainly because we already heard the $100 million rumor, but it's not like $10 million is chump change
Are these kind of settlements taxed? Maybe breh just wanted to be done with it all, took the $10 million, and moved on
Of course... which is more than likely why it’s not true
So only someone at the firm can make up the $10 mill number?Whatever helps you sleep. The person who wrote it is putting their rep on the line. They've reported news on my firm that only people at the firm would know.
bruh Kaep was blackballed for 2 seasons. $10M that he has to split with Reid IS chump change.
nikkas said the NFL took an L buy "legally admitting guilt" ......$10M IS NOT A fukkING L
evne $50M isn't an L but nikkas wanted to be all obtuse "bu-bubu-but legally the NFL admitted guilt, the owners are tarnished forever"
yea didn't see it was $10 million SHARED until I read the ESPN article on this
The fact two credible news sources are reporting this can't be good for the "its a lie" stance
I'm trying remember if the $100 million claim was ever actually reported by any official news sites that would collaborate the "sources", think I only saw it on here and twitter
WSJ reporting is top notch.First off, WSJ is conservative as fukk so let's hold on for a second....
If this is true tho.....
WSJ reporting is top notch.
Their op-ed page is another story though...full of nonsense.
yea didn't see it was $10 million SHARED until I read the ESPN article on this
The fact two credible news sources are reporting this can't be good for the "its a lie" stance
I'm trying remember if the $100 million claim was ever actually reported by any official news sites that would collaborate the "sources", think I only saw it on here and twitter