People must feel things are not so bad if that's the case.Not cause of NYT endorsement breh... its cause Biden will be the nominee and it'll be another shid show election
i think that’s a critical question and one that I do think provides some validity to endorsing two people, but I just don’t see how Amy becomes the standard bearer for the moderates and not Joe if that’s part of their rationaleWhere they differ most significantly is not the what but the how, in whether they believe the country’s institutions and norms are up to the challenge of the moment.
lastly, if trump wins, seems like a lot of people are having a “in hindsight, he was a decent candidate” moment about booker, wonder if it makes him viable for 2024?
Booker was never winning shyti think that’s a critical question and one that I do think provides some validity to endorsing two people, but I just don’t see how Amy becomes the standard bearer for the moderates and not Joe if that’s part of their rationale
also, is there a write up anywhere of why they were going to choose booker before he suspended his campaign?
lastly, if trump wins, seems like a lot of people are having a “in hindsight, he was a decent candidate” moment about booker, wonder if it makes him viable for 2024?
what is the value of a dual endorsement? to me this makes it blatantly obvious this endorsement has more to do with the candidates gender than policy.Dope let's get someone new to represent the party at election time. Biden and bernie half dead asses
How?
Dems player that bullshyt it’s her turn with Hillary last time
I don't think it affects Biden either way, and Yang is beyond help.It really is. Their explanations and logic weren't very convincing.
I think this non endorsement might be the best thing to happen to Biden Yang and Bernie