Easily
The 2nd video is 100% a strawman. Not only does it assume the size of the ENTIRE EARTH is ~the size of one of the Dakota's, IT'S STILL OPERATING AND MAKING ASSUMPTIONS BASED OFF OF A HELIOCENTRIC MODEL
There is no "southern hemisphere" in ANY flat earth model, so how whoever made that video came to the conclusion that there are still non-visible constellations in the nonexistent SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE in and of itself already disproves the video
As I already stated, the psuedo-intellectual video assumes that the ENTIRE PLANE OF EARTH is the size of 1 US state, and it puts the sun and moon on a path rotating around a landmass that is 1/120TH THE SIZE OF THE ACTUAL PLANET
Secondly the sun and moon don't "radiate out in all directions" like the person in the video incorrectly stated(yet another strawman). They shine down DIRECTLY OVER THEIR PATH OF MOTION, LIKE A SPOTLIGHT
Angles of sunlight like this ARE NOT POSSIBLE ON A SPHERICAL GLOBE WITH A SUN 93 MILLION+ MILES AWAY. It's literally this simple smh
If the sun WERE ACTUALLY 93 million miles away, ALL SUNLIGHT THAT THE EARTH RECEIVES WOULD BE PARALLEL IN VECTOR. Another refutation of your rhetoric
This is how sunlight WOULD look if the sun was that far away smh
Please try again, which actual factual information next time thanks
The first video proves my point AGAIN smh
1. NO CURVATURE ANYWHERE IN THE VIDEO
2. AS I SAID BEFORE, the higher your elevation, the more of the landmass you are able to observe, which means BY NATURE, the MORE SUNLIGHT YOU ARE ABLE TO OBSERVE
These are simple concepts smh
Keep posting failures though /shrug. I'll be here exposing you