New Pics of Jupiter from NASA's Probe

[xCivicx]

Eclipses can't happen with this model try again


Moon can't change shape either. Try again

This model explains eclipses perfectly. You should learn what the word CONCENTRIC means simpleton

The sun and moons paths overlap which causes eclipses simpleton

Unless you're stupid enough to believe that the sun at "93 million miles away" just happens to be the exact perfect distance away from the moon to appear the same size during eclipses smfh

You're really out of your intellectual league here champ, you should just concede already. I've literally picked apart every point that you have tried to introduce

 

[Cabbage Patch]

We'll all be dead before they figure out what's all out there

Knowing and telling is different.



So when did Jupiter turn from orange with a big ass red spot, to clay with a shytload of blue?

 

[Cabbage Patch]

if u look close...there's somethin there pointin at us and sayin...

That's probably true.

Which is worse, though: being eyed for destruction, or being destroyed because no one knows you're there? Jovian life might not even recognize us as existing...

Either way, we got as much chance to fight back as Mars, which got smote so bad made Earth's Great Extinction look like a mere meteor shower. So fukk it.

 

[Cabbage Patch]

No Africana?

I know Europa and/or Titan are supposed to be potentially habitable for human colonization.



breh.

....

Africa, like Asia, was never one of Dyeus Pita's child rape victims.


But you have a bigger point.

 

[Paradoxical Tiger]

Why do you keep posting this lie?

Literally nothing in your posts have provided evidence for this. You're literally just covering your eyes and ears and repeating the same thing like a toddler having a temper tantrum

Once again, no curvature at all shown over or across the person gulf in the video you posted. Thanks again for proving my point

Yeah you must be some type of troll. Nobody saying that you can actually SEE the curvature at the top of the tower, you only see evidence of the curvature with the sun being in the sky for 2 extra minutes.


I watched your little video with the lady trying to explain why the ship looks like it's sinking in water. When it's not, atmospheric distortion is making it look like it's in water earlier compared to if it showed it going over the curvature. Read dude, read. If you conduct that experiment again, with a better camera, on a cooler day, you will see that the lines change. I'm not providing any videos do it yourself. You the one talking in circles not reading properly.



And that doesn't explain when the earth eclipses the moon. LOL you talking about when the moon eclipses the sun.

 

[Paradoxical Tiger]

This model explains eclipses perfectly. You should learn what the word CONCENTRIC means simpleton

The sun and moons paths overlap which causes eclipses simpleton

Unless you're stupid enough to believe that the sun at "93 million miles away" just happens to be the exact perfect distance away from the moon to appear the same size during eclipses smfh

You're really out of your intellectual league here champ, you should just concede already. I've literally picked apart every point that you have tried to introduce

And even that doesn't explain anything wtf. The entire world would see two balls in the sky you idiot LOL. Eclipses only happen in certain regions not the entire earth.


EDIT: Some parts would either see two balls or nothing in the sky. THAT DOESNT HAPPEN DURING ECLIPSES.

 

[iBrowse]

New pics from Juno ($1 billion NASA probe) brehs. Word up, dun.

Man I wanna tag the breh who posts in the Coliseum with a name that's like Dr. The Earth Is Flat Irving

I wish I remembered it

 

[Paradoxical Tiger]

This model explains eclipses perfectly. You should learn what the word CONCENTRIC means simpleton

The sun and moons paths overlap which causes eclipses simpleton

Unless you're stupid enough to believe that the sun at "93 million miles away" just happens to be the exact perfect distance away from the moon to appear the same size during eclipses smfh

You're really out of your intellectual league here champ, you should just concede already. I've literally picked apart every point that you have tried to introduce

And to put you away, if that model was true DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD WOULD REPORT THE SUN BEING IN DIFFERENT POSITIONS


The sun would always be low in North America when it shows up. High in South America when it shows up. Same with the moon.


Dawg you just killed yourself, you should've kept that model out of your argument

 

[xCivicx]

Yeah you must be some type of troll. Nobody saying that you can actually SEE the curvature at the top of the tower, you only see evidence of the curvature with the sun being in the sky for 2 extra minutes.


I watched your little video with the lady trying to explain why the ship looks like it's sinking in water. When it's not, atmospheric distortion is making it look like it's in water earlier compared to if it showed it going over the curvature. Read dude, read. If you conduct that experiment again, with a better camera, on a cooler day, you will see that the lines change. I'm not providing any videos do it yourself. You the one talking in circles not reading properly.



And that doesn't explain when the earth eclipses the moon. LOL you talking about when the moon eclipses the sun.

Once again simpleton, standing at the tip of the tower and looking over the Persian gulf, you should be able to curvature TO YOUR LEFT AND RIGHT OVER SAID LARGE BODY OF WATER

There is no curvature visible to the left or right in the video you posted, which, once again, proves MY point and REFUTES YOURS

Lunar eclipse don't make sense AT ALL in the heliocentric model simpleton

And I'm not sure what "lines" you're talking about, but feel free to post any video you can find disproving the FACTS in the video I posted. Or just record yourself failing to disprove my statements with your own experiment

I'll wait

 

[xCivicx]

And even that doesn't explain anything wtf. The entire world would see two balls in the sky you idiot LOL. Eclipses only happen in certain regions not the entire earth.


EDIT: Some parts would either see two balls or nothing in the sky. THAT DOESNT HAPPEN DURING ECLIPSES.

Smh what are you talking about simpleton??

You can clearly see the moon during daytime OFTEN

ONCE AGAIN, thank you for proving my point

 

[Paradoxical Tiger]

Once again simpleton, standing at the tip of the tower and looking over the Persian gulf, you should be able to curvature TO YOUR LEFT AND RIGHT OVER SAID LARGE BODY OF WATER

There is no curvature visible to the left or right in the video you posted, which, once again, proves MY point and REFUTES YOURS

Lunar eclipse don't make sense AT ALL in the heliocentric model simpleton

And I'm not sure what "lines" you're talking about, but feel free to post any video you can find disproving the FACTS in the video I posted. Or just record yourself failing to disprove my statements with your own experiment

I'll wait

No you shouldn't see the curvature YOU HAVE TO HE HIGHER. Lol you starting to fold. Quit looking for the actual curvature in the video. The two extra minutes at the top of the tower is my point. You keep trying to say that you would see the actual curvature!

REFUTE THE DAMN SUN BEING UP 2 EXTRA MINUTES AT THE TOP OF THE TOWER.

If you can't then you lost.


Explain how the moon gets eclipses smart ass LOL you starting to fold

 

[Paradoxical Tiger]

Smh what are you talking about simpleton??

You can clearly see the moon during daytime OFTEN

ONCE AGAIN, thank you for proving my point

The entire earth would see an eclipse or something similar according to this model LOL you lost

 

[Paradoxical Tiger]

Smh what are you talking about simpleton??

You can clearly see the moon during daytime OFTEN

ONCE AGAIN, thank you for proving my point

Not only would the entire earth see something like a eclipse, SOME PARTS OF THE EARTH WONT EVEN HAVE A MOON IN THE SKY! LOL that doesn't happen during eclipses!

 

[xCivicx]

And to put you away, if that model was true DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD WOULD REPORT THE SUN BEING IN DIFFERENT POSITIONS


The sun would always be low in North America when it shows up. High in South America when it shows up. Same with the moon.


Dawg you just killed yourself, you should've kept that model out of your argument

Once again wrong simpleton

Once again, you don't understand the words I'm using on a fundamental level simpleton, you have no business in this thread smh

Both the sun and moon move in CONCENTRIC SPIRALING PATHS simpleton

So no, the strawman garbage youre trying to argue doesnt make sense

Every region experiences the sun and moon rising and setting in slightly different positions as the seasons change

What else can I teach you

 

[xCivicx]

The entire earth would see an eclipse or something similar according to this model LOL you lost

No it wouldn't simpleton

That's your own simple mind drawing illogical conclusions

The entire earth doesn't experience sunlight in the model I posted, so why would the entire earth experience an eclipse simpleton?