Nessa (Kaepernick's Girlfriend) And Eric Reid Going In On Jay-Z For Partnering With The NFL

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,317
Reputation
2,281
Daps
52,605
Reppin
NULL
Still waiting on someone to tell me what the correct next step was supposed to be, outside of kaep getting a job.. The faux outrage is hilarious
well that would be up to kap and reid to decide. jayz has nothin to do wit the situation lol
hes piggybackin off their movement so he can make more money.
he didnt talk to kap beforehand for a reason. he knew he wouldnt be cool with it
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,026
Reputation
2,191
Daps
129,098
Still waiting on someone to tell me what the correct next step was supposed to be, outside of kaep getting a job.. The faux outrage is hilarious
Quietly buy a team like he wanted too for his own personal benefit instead of using his fame as "social injustice " pr to tap dance for NFL white racist fans and team owners .
 

gluvnast

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
9,729
Reputation
1,529
Daps
27,761
Reppin
NULL
I don't know if this article has been posted, but it really clears up a lot of the misconceptions about Kaepernick's settlement, if correct.

Colin Kaepernick Settled His Grievance, Jay-Z Is Just Taking The Money

1. The NFL CBA did not allow Kaep to outright sue the NFL civilly. You MUST go through arbitration.

2. The arbitration is ALL or NOTHING, meaning the arbitrator must rule completely for Kaep or the NFL. If the arbitrator rules in favor for the NFL, KAEP would get nothing (no job, no money, no admittance of guilt from the NFL)

3. When the arbitrator dismissed the NFL's motion for a summary judgement, KAEP WON. There was enough evidence to show that the NFL (at least some teams) possibly colluded to keep him from playing. But no one TREATED it like a win. Why?

4. The evidence brought forth in arbitration would NEVER become public (not legally, at least). If he won, he still could not discuss the findings, and the NFL still would not have to admit any fault. Only the judgement in his favor would be public. I was wrong, like many others, to think that Kaep's settlement was the reason for this.

5. The NFL initiated the settlement after their summary judgment was dismissed.

6. Kaep still wanted to play football. It's his livlihood and passion.Whether he won, loss or settled, the NFL still could not be forced to hire him.

7. Not settling would be a gigantic gamble. Remember, Kaep's case was against the NFL(all 32 teams). Proving that every team was involved in collusion is EXTREMELY difficult. And when you say "NFL", are we talking about Goddell?executives? GMs? Coaches? Everyone? Kaep's ability to take his case as far as he did is amazing.

8. Between showing that there was some level of collusion, getting a reasonable money settlement, knowing the NFL would not be forced to hire him anyway, knowing the arbitration findings would be sealed no matter what, and that the arbitrator had to side with him COMPLETELY, he took the settlement.

If I misunderstood anything, let me know brehs

The Jay Z angle is a whole other issue.

Here's what does not make zero sense with this argument. The arbitrator ruled in the NFL's summary judgment. This was meaning that Kaep & Reid's grievance can be taken to court with all of the evidence. The NFL reach and worked out an agreement with Kaepernick and Reid signing a NDA. What was the NDA for if this claim that the evidence was going to be sealed from the public anyway? What Kaep is not allowed to discuss or he'll be in breach of the settlement? And what positive result came from it? It was reported back in March that the compensation was ONLY 10 MILLION split between both Reid and Kaep. This is before the attorney fees and the taxes. So they basically didn't get shyt. The evidence is sealed. There's no official ruling for or against. And everything still as it was before Kaepernick filed the grievance. So what was the point? For Kaepernick to only receive less than 5 million for his troubles? And no matter how much he REALLY gotten. What has changed in the bigger picture? Absolutely nothing.
 

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,940
Reputation
5,705
Daps
234,983
well that would be up to kap and reid to decide. jayz has nothin to do wit the situation lol
hes piggybackin off their movement so he can make more money.
he didnt talk to kap beforehand for a reason. he knew he wouldnt be cool with it
That's why people don't talk to people before they do shyt...they might not get that answer they want.
 

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,940
Reputation
5,705
Daps
234,983
nikkas is getting death threats over taking their stance and y'all ready to let Jigga come in and tell you what the next steps is when he didn't risk shyt

 

gluvnast

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Messages
9,729
Reputation
1,529
Daps
27,761
Reppin
NULL

Wear My Dawg's Hat

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,532
Reputation
1,940
Daps
15,011
Reppin
The Land That Time Forgot
Here's what does not make zero sense with this argument. The arbitrator ruled in the NFL's summary judgment. This was meaning that Kaep & Reid's grievance can be taken to court with all of the evidence. The NFL reach and worked out an agreement with Kaepernick and Reid signing a NDA. What was the NDA for if this claim that the evidence was going to be sealed from the public anyway? What Kaep is not allowed to discuss or he'll be in breach of the settlement? And what positive result came from it? It was reported back in March that the compensation was ONLY 10 MILLION split between both Reid and Kaep. This is before the attorney fees and the taxes. So they basically didn't get shyt. The evidence is sealed. There's no official ruling for or against. And everything still as it was before Kaepernick filed the grievance. So what was the point? For Kaepernick to only receive less than 5 million for his troubles? And no matter how much he REALLY gotten. What has changed in the bigger picture? Absolutely nothing.

More than likely, Mark Geragos, Colin's lawyer, told him that they didn't have enough evidence to prove
lawful collusion by the NFL owners, so in order for a very large legal bill to be paid to him, he highly encouraged
Colin to settle with the League.

It should be noted that historically, both Muhammad Ali and Curt flood took their legal disputes all the way to the Supreme Court.

1*C4XlNsmK7L_wlxbzs78OwQ.jpeg


AKKI2SX5NV5XITBGYK2RN2QN6E.jpg
 
Top