Jazz died commercially for reasons behind the scenes involving politics and public perception of black people in a global arena during the cold war. By the time those other genres came around there was already an agenda in place with how to market black music and what it should be thanks to how jazz was handled. Those popular markers you're talking about are based on traditional stereotypes.
To your point, talking about popularity is why I brought up marginalization. It doesn't matter if you said the genre isn't dying if it is no longer as viable in popularity like jazz once was if you're measuring it's popularity by how danceable it is. It's certainly no longer having the same effect and declining ("dying") in prominence. Popularity for how you're associating it has to do with how danceable the music is:
Is there an association between a music's popularity with how danceable and fun it is
/r? What do you have to say about house music
/r?
If that's the case, why is it what black popular music is marginalized to how danceable it is given the history of black music
/r?
Paid in Full was a club track, but not all their music were club tracks was my point.
When did the club (a place for dancing) become the only place for hip-hop to thrive
/r?
Jazz did not traditionally have this problem.
Hip-hop has the opportunity to course correct where black music always went wrong: the expectation that it has to be danceable and fun to be popular.
European classical music has a number of dance forms, but it can be taken seriously.
Why is it when it comes to black music it needs to danceable and fun to be popular
/r?
I thought we was trying to move on to bigger and better things for our culture.
Cordially. Peace.