Amo Husserl
Superstar
White people makin' up stuff and sellin' errbody else the subscription service on some pyramid scheme shyt.
Neil deGrasse Tyson’s 20-Minute TAKEDOWN of Christianity
- Thread starter bnew
- Start date
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that may never be questioned.
Religion is answers that may never be questioned.
As time passes you know it was never real and b*stardization of something that was real that was past down orally to be lost by a corrupted priest hood
that took the original tale of EL and the rest of the powerful ones "elohim" and switched it so they could get resources from the tribes 10% of crops 10% of lifestock
for those that know know and I commend you
you can read pieces of it even in your bible today all crammed into each other
it's literally 3 stories of Joseph and which one is the logic of God "word"?.
never was an exodus just a "egyptain" cult that left Egypt they tell you in plain sight.
the mystic you call christ tells you how the old ways was of the wicked one
only those that fear leaving the current body they are in to move to the next life in their new body
fear the lack of no "religion"
so they need a religion but deep down they know it's not true I study the faith long enough.
we got a lot of brehs that come from Africa east and west
their family that was converted by white missionaries some of them post here still stuck with that mind set.
not 1 can tell you they actually interacted with a God
not 1 can heal
not 1 can see
not 1 can hear
sptirual speaking
just post scriptures
Problem with fake jews today more and more they realize thier folk lore is false they more they will lash out and "samson" the earth
if you know you know.
Now 1 thing i need to dig into if "Paul" was actually Rome
that took the original tale of EL and the rest of the powerful ones "elohim" and switched it so they could get resources from the tribes 10% of crops 10% of lifestock
for those that know know and I commend you
you can read pieces of it even in your bible today all crammed into each other
it's literally 3 stories of Joseph and which one is the logic of God "word"?.
never was an exodus just a "egyptain" cult that left Egypt they tell you in plain sight.
the mystic you call christ tells you how the old ways was of the wicked one
only those that fear leaving the current body they are in to move to the next life in their new body
fear the lack of no "religion"
so they need a religion but deep down they know it's not true I study the faith long enough.
we got a lot of brehs that come from Africa east and west
their family that was converted by white missionaries some of them post here still stuck with that mind set.
not 1 can tell you they actually interacted with a God
not 1 can heal
not 1 can see
not 1 can hear
sptirual speaking
just post scriptures
Problem with fake jews today more and more they realize thier folk lore is false they more they will lash out and "samson" the earth
if you know you know.
Now 1 thing i need to dig into if "Paul" was actually Rome
Last edited:
You 7th Day Adventist? In my teens, my aunt told me something that sounded a lot like your post. Like the wicked and faithless folk just getting purged (soul destroyed) to nothing and that eternal torment is actually for Satan and the angels that followed him since they are eternal beings. But I don't know breh eternal oblivion sounds a lot better than eternal roasting.
Fillerguy
Veteran
The Anti apartheid movement of South Africa. And various civil rights movements in America, depending on your definition of religious....however I'm hesitant to reference any non religious western movements. We have a long and storied history of culling counter-religious thinking, even amount Christianity. Europeans have done a fantastic job of conflating "whiteness" with "Christianness". So much so, that one could agrue that rejecting white supremacy is a hop, skip and a jump from being rejecting most dominant forms of modern Christianity.
Neil doesn't really peddle opinions tho. He's not a talking head ass YouTube blogger with no education. I mean I never heard him speak on transgender but when he speaks about physics those are not opinions.
It is how he presents the information that matters.
There are several highly trained astrophysicists that argue that God is real and why, they too use physics to defend their case.
Dr. Zweerink:
Dr. Ross
Neil isn’t the only astrophysicist on earth. He isn’t the smartest astrophysicist on earth. He is ideologically captured and uses his knowledge to his audiences (you) ignorance to paint a picture to support his ideological beliefs.
His latest grift is using “science” to prove men and women aren’t “real” and as such, men can be women and vice versa.
Absolutely nobody sane believes that. And he knows that. But he LEADS with ideology first, then babbles about science to act as though it is supported. It is not.
He’s a fraud. And also a sexual assaulter. Not like most of you care about that, though.
ReasonableMatic
................................
Christianity in Africa - Wikipedia
“False, Massa didn’t impose Christianity to brainwash, enslave and keep us docile”
-
Last edited:
Field Marshall Bradley
Veteran
The civil rights movement and the Haitian uprising are pristine examples of religious movements. The fact you don’t think the CRM wasn’t a religious/spiritual movement tells me all I need to know about ya
IIVI
Superstar
Honestly, how about instead of spending this time trying to dunk on people (many are good Christians), do Physics research instead?
I say this as an Engineer who happens to be religious, this is a waste of time. Some of the greatest Physicists of all-time were devout Christians and members of other religions. Some wonderful scientists and engineers today are also religious and hurting nobody either.
All this does is insult people and spin-off right into circular debates. That’s why I say dude is more of a grifter than scientist at this point. There are plenty more people, many religious, doing more scientific research and advancements than dude.
I’ll go on even further to say I don’t even think White Christians are the worst people in society. It’s manipulative White Atheists. People like Elon, Trump, etc. are hardly religious. If there were no religion, these people would still find a way to control people. Save the energy for them.
A theory of mine (but not outright belief) is that religion may have been invented to slow savages and psychopaths down and promote/hope for peace instead. A way to hopefully have these bloodthirsty people spare them. Then it basically got hijacked by said savages. These savages are the problem, not the religion.
I say this as an Engineer who happens to be religious, this is a waste of time. Some of the greatest Physicists of all-time were devout Christians and members of other religions. Some wonderful scientists and engineers today are also religious and hurting nobody either.
All this does is insult people and spin-off right into circular debates. That’s why I say dude is more of a grifter than scientist at this point. There are plenty more people, many religious, doing more scientific research and advancements than dude.
I’ll go on even further to say I don’t even think White Christians are the worst people in society. It’s manipulative White Atheists. People like Elon, Trump, etc. are hardly religious. If there were no religion, these people would still find a way to control people. Save the energy for them.
A theory of mine (but not outright belief) is that religion may have been invented to slow savages and psychopaths down and promote/hope for peace instead. A way to hopefully have these bloodthirsty people spare them. Then it basically got hijacked by said savages. These savages are the problem, not the religion.
Last edited:
Consistent throughout the universe
?"We've explored a minuscule fraction of the universe, with our physical exploration largely confined to our solar system, while our observational knowledge extends to the observable universe,"
Thats like me telling you the world is safe because my neighborhood is. Secondly the Big Bang theory only lends credibility to creation. It just sounds like a much dumber idea than saying God created us.
But the big bang says the universe was created in miliseconds as a "soup". So if you believe that,how is it a leap to say we were blinked into existence like I Dream Of Genie? Whats to say the earth couldnt be old,while its creations new? A God could literally blink everything into and out existence at will. If a universe can be created in miliseconds according to scientist,it makes it very plausible. We could literally be on season 7 of Humanity. God gets tired of us,blinks us out of existence and says "im going back to dinasours for a bit
".All I know is the idea of God is in our default settings,like knowing how to breast feed,knowing how to crawl, how to have sex etc
Never said he was the only one. I'm not in his fanclub and neither is he catering to the "ignorant". I love how you've established that his mostly Black audience is only captivated because we don't know better. Says a lot about YOU
You acting all the way retarded brother tone it down a lot. No he's not a fraud at all. His credentials are not in question and lastly you jumped out the window entirely with that sexual assault slander. He put his arm on a woman shoulder and she tried to #metoo him over that 10 years later.
Can't even believe you tried to weaponize that false allegation. Clearly you are willing to lie about dude you are not impartial or objective. You are just a straight up loser ass hater. Grown men with no integrity don't need to lie and embellish to get any valid point across. When you need to stand on lies to make your claims more enticing you are a stupid person with no integrity. Do better. Especially for someone calling a man with his credibility/credentials a liar then chosing to lie in order to get your points across. You could have just said you disagree with his stance on trans stuff instead of pretending he is a fraud because of a viewpoint or 2 you don't like. You reacted like a clown. An intellectual would always be up for a debate. A clown gets in his feelings and does what you doing in here
Last edited:
"In the late 15th century, Portuguese traders and missionaries began arriving in West Africa, first in Guinea, Mauritania, the Gambia, Ghana, and Sierra Leone, then Nigeria and later in the Kingdom of Kongo, where they would find success in converting prominent local leaders to Catholicism."Christianity in Africa - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
“False, Massa didn’t impose Christianity to brainwash, enslave and keep us docile”
-
Are you looking for answers? Because if so, I have them.
The idea that white Europeans brought Christianity to Africa is a colonial myth it ignores centuries of African Christian leadership, theology, and missionary work.
One of the first converts was a Ethiopian official, and by the 3rd and 4th centuries Ethiopia became one of the first nations to declare Christianity the state religion before Rome did.
European regions didnt convert til the 7th–11th centuries.
Christianity didn’t come from Europe. It came through the Middle East took root in Africa and then expanded globally.
African Christians were part of the original church. African theologians helped shape Christian doctrine. And African soil held some of the earliest and most influential Christian communities in history.
African Christians brought Christianity to the world, not the other way around.
You wasting your time. Dude is a religion loon...
@ReasonableMatic
Ephesians 6:5 - 8 "Bondservants, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ, not by the way of eye-service, as people-pleasers, but as bondservants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart, rendering service with a good will as to the Lord and not to man, knowing that whatever good anyone does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether he is a bondservant or is free."
In 1st century, a "bondservant" (or "slave") wasn’t always what we picture from American slavery. Many were people who worked under someone to pay off debts, sometimes by choice, and sometimes born into it. Some were treated well others were not. It wasn’t ideal but it was part of the economy and society at the time.
Paul is not endorsing slavery, he’s speaking to real people living in a real system that already existed. Instead of starting a political revolution (which would’ve gotten Christians killed instantly in Rome), he focused on transforming hearts inside the system.
This passage is about faithfulness, not slavery approval.
In the very next verse (Ephesians 6:9), Paul tells masters to treat their servants with respect and no threats, because God shows no favoritism. That was crazy in a culture where masters could legally kill slaves without consequence.
Paul wasn’t teaching Christians how to support slavery he was teaching Christians how to live faithfully in an unjust world until God changes it from the inside out.
And over time, that heart-change approach led to revolutions like with William Wilberforce who used scriptures like this to fight slavery altogether with US.
CONTEXT
Ephesians 6:5 - 8 "Bondservants, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ, not by the way of eye-service, as people-pleasers, but as bondservants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart, rendering service with a good will as to the Lord and not to man, knowing that whatever good anyone does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether he is a bondservant or is free."
In 1st century, a "bondservant" (or "slave") wasn’t always what we picture from American slavery. Many were people who worked under someone to pay off debts, sometimes by choice, and sometimes born into it. Some were treated well others were not. It wasn’t ideal but it was part of the economy and society at the time.
Paul is not endorsing slavery, he’s speaking to real people living in a real system that already existed. Instead of starting a political revolution (which would’ve gotten Christians killed instantly in Rome), he focused on transforming hearts inside the system.
This passage is about faithfulness, not slavery approval.
In the very next verse (Ephesians 6:9), Paul tells masters to treat their servants with respect and no threats, because God shows no favoritism. That was crazy in a culture where masters could legally kill slaves without consequence.
Paul wasn’t teaching Christians how to support slavery he was teaching Christians how to live faithfully in an unjust world until God changes it from the inside out.
And over time, that heart-change approach led to revolutions like with William Wilberforce who used scriptures like this to fight slavery altogether with US.
CONTEXT
Your 2025 brain makes you a heretic in 1825Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that may never be questioned.
