This is dope, shout out to all the great men who should’ve been recognized( officially ) a long time ago for their greatness…… cacs bout to be mad
So josh Gibson the home run king now
BATTING AVERAGE | SLUGGING PERCENTAGE | OPS |
---|---|---|
1. Josh Gibson: .446 in 1943 | 1. Josh Gibson: .974 in 1937 | 1. Josh Gibson: 1.474 in 1931 |
2. Charlie Smith: .451 in 1929 | 2. Mule Stuttes: .898 in 1927 | 2. Josh Gibson: 1.435 in 1943 |
3. Hugh Duffy: .440 in 1898 | 3. Josh Gibson: .871 in 1943 | 3. Barry Bonds: 1.421 in 2004 |
nah
As result of Wednesday's integration, Negro Leagues legend Josh Gibson is now the all-time leader in career batting average (.372, beating out Ty Cobb's .366), slugging percentage (.718, beating out Babe Ruth's .690), and OPS (1.177, beating out Ruth's 1.164). Gibson is also the new single-season leader in those categories. The new single-season leaderboards:
BATTING AVERAGE SLUGGING PERCENTAGE OPS 1. Josh Gibson: .446 in 1943 1. Josh Gibson: .974 in 1937 1. Josh Gibson: 1.474 in 1931 2. Charlie Smith: .451 in 1929 2. Mule Stuttes: .898 in 1927 2. Josh Gibson: 1.435 in 1943 3. Hugh Duffy: .440 in 1898 3. Josh Gibson: .871 in 1943 3. Barry Bonds: 1.421 in 2004
that racist cac ty cobb
Those slugging pct are not rightnah
As result of Wednesday's integration, Negro Leagues legend Josh Gibson is now the all-time leader in career batting average (.372, beating out Ty Cobb's .366), slugging percentage (.718, beating out Babe Ruth's .690), and OPS (1.177, beating out Ruth's 1.164). Gibson is also the new single-season leader in those categories. The new single-season leaderboards:
BATTING AVERAGE SLUGGING PERCENTAGE OPS 1. Josh Gibson: .446 in 1943 1. Josh Gibson: .974 in 1937 1. Josh Gibson: 1.474 in 1931 2. Charlie Smith: .451 in 1929 2. Mule Stuttes: .898 in 1927 2. Josh Gibson: 1.435 in 1943 3. Hugh Duffy: .440 in 1898 3. Josh Gibson: .871 in 1943 3. Barry Bonds: 1.421 in 2004
that racist cac ty cobb
Those slugging pct are not right
edit
i don’t think these stats being allowed is fair
Their seasons were 1/3 of 162why?