yeah but remember they are letters from Paul to those churches to instruct them. He ultimately was still spreading the gospels of christ. I like to use the goarch.org page. They have a gospel reading and an epistle reading every day. and sometimes Matins gospel as wellIt’s funny you say that, I learned that the hard way last week. I’ve been taking a more offensive strategy now. Don’t forget the epistles breh. Romans and Thessalonians are rich.
Yes they are letters to the Churches but it’s not as specific like the ones in Revelation. Those epistles are still full of verses applicable to the Christian walk. We all go through the same stuff 1 Corinthians 10:13. Galatians 1:8 warning us if we are to hear false Gospel. So much wisdom in all the epistles.yeah but remember they are letters from Paul to those churches to instruct them. He ultimately was still spreading the gospels of christ. I like to use the goarch.org page. They have a gospel reading and an epistle reading every day. and sometimes Matins gospel as well
if i have not shared this with you, please read this as well. Its an old manuscript still in use from ancient church fathers
Didache. The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (translation Roberts-Donaldson).
Didache. The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (translation Roberts-Donaldson). On Early Christian Writings.www.earlychristianwritings.com
That sucksFrom what I've observed, this only really hurts the women who try to weapons flirting or bring that unprofessionalism to the office.
I haven't seen men just refuse to deal with women in the office. What I have seen is awkward laughs in response to flirting before moving the conversation on.
thank youYes they are letters to the Churches but it’s not as specific like the ones in Revelation. Those epistles are still full of verses applicable to the Christian walk. We all go through the same stuff 1 Corinthians 10:13. Galatians 1:8 warning us if we are to hear false Gospel. So much wisdom in all the epistles.
Yes I know of the Didache. Let me dump you some notes.
Non Canon approved books
1 Clement (no heresy but not inspired word of God)
Didache (how to live as a Christian, more of instruction than theology. Acknowledges baptism and the holy trinity)
Shepherd of Hermas (definitely not apostolic/canon. Church fathers knew who wrote it. Not theological, more of instruction)
Letter from Polycarp to Philippians (quotes scripture and of instruction. Not apostolic/canon.)
Rejected books that have been labeled heretical by the Church:
gospel of Thomas (gnostic belief, written around 150 AD. Only one copy exists. Heresy)
The Infancy gospel of Thomas (the false story of Jesus as a child making birds of out clay and this is in the quran.)
gospel of mary (has that nonsense gnostic belief of women becoming men for salvation smh lol)
gospel of Peter (myth, moving talking cross smh)
Protoevangelion of James (full of heresies and in quran)
gospel of judas (makes judas a good guy)
Acts of John (gnostic)
Acts of Paul (Paul reminds a lion that he was baptized and rides his back to escape theater)
I hate that trend too but breh is championed here. Coli the reason I know why breh existsCan't click any video with someone making retarded faces on the thumbnail already know some dumb ass commentary will follow
Zero clicks, word to @MajesticLion