He was shot close range because the officer was grabbing him. I thought this was already established?
Witness testimony from a bunch of hoodboogers outweighs Forensic Evidence
Got it.. This case is done.
That hit was clean as fukkIgnore the two white construction workers and disparage all the black witnesses brehs
fukk you fakkit
So Officer Wilson's account of the shooting is backed by forensic evidence?
Interesting..
I cant believe how far this country is willing to go...god help us all
how the fukk does an autopsy have the abilitty to prove that ?
for real though somebody put me on game of how it works. til then i'm calling tales from the duck keeper
The official autopsy on Michael Brown, leaked to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, suggests that he was shot in the hand at close range and may have reached for the police officer’s gun, outside experts told the newspaper.
That would contradict what private experts reported after they conducted an autopsy for Brown’s family. Those experts said there were no signs of a struggle between Brown and Officer Darren Wilson, who shot him to death Aug. 9 in the suburb of Ferguson.
A supplemental examination in the official autopsy published by the Post-Dispatch found material “consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm” in Brown’s right hand.
Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist not involved in the autopsy, told the newspaper that the finding “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun, if he has gunpowder particulate material in the wound.” Melinek also told the newspaper that the autopsy did not support witness accounts that the fatal shot, later, was fired while Brown was running away from the officer or had his hands up.
The Post-Dispatch also reported Wednesday, citing an unnamed source with knowledge of the matter, that Wilson has told investigators that Brown pressed the barrel of the gun against Wilson’s hip during a struggle inside the officer’s SUV.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/mi...l-brown-reached-ferguson-officers-gun-n231391
Well well well :bayer:
Absolutely. What Wilson carried out was an execution. He had all the power to let Michael Brown live.All that speaks to is that the barrel of the gun was close to his hand. If Wilson drew the firearm and Brown had his hand in a defense position close to the barrel, we'd get the same results. This scenario also coordinates with the eye witness testimony.
Mind you, this is all before Brown surrendered with his hands in the air. Whatever happened inside that car shouldn't outweigh Brown's surrender.
The official autopsy on Michael Brown, leaked to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, suggests that he was shot in the hand at close range and may have reached for the police officer’s gun, outside experts told the newspaper.
That would contradict what private experts reported after they conducted an autopsy for Brown’s family. Those experts said there were no signs of a struggle between Brown and Officer Darren Wilson, who shot him to death Aug. 9 in the suburb of Ferguson.
A supplemental examination in the official autopsy published by the Post-Dispatch found material “consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm” in Brown’s right hand.
Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist not involved in the autopsy, told the newspaper that the finding “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun, if he has gunpowder particulate material in the wound.” Melinek also told the newspaper that the autopsy did not support witness accounts that the fatal shot, later, was fired while Brown was running away from the officer or had his hands up.
The Post-Dispatch also reported Wednesday, citing an unnamed source with knowledge of the matter, that Wilson has told investigators that Brown pressed the barrel of the gun against Wilson’s hip during a struggle inside the officer’s SUV.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/mi...l-brown-reached-ferguson-officers-gun-n231391
Well well well :bayer:
Any facts that emerge debunking the 'Brown was shot in cold blood' narrative will get the at this point. It is what it is