I'm saying prove it, because for every other player you or someone else claimed could do it, they didn't. I'm not saying Dunn can't. I'm saying its not gonna happen next year.
He's gonna be gone after next year. Fine. Do I think they're better off doing that? Unless Dunn PROVES that, no. The reality is I don't see how trading their best defender, passer and rebounder on a deficient in all three areas helps unless Dunn is better than him at all three phases next year and you know he won't. To say he will would mean he's not just ROY. He'd be a top 20 player and an MVP candidate. I like Dunn, but I don't think he's that level of good (otherwise he should have unquestionably went first overall).
Not to mention the bench still looks like shyt and the best scorer on it is likely the guy Thibs will wanna run outta here.
You still don't get it. This isn't pessimism. This is a 12 year streak that hasn't been broken. This isn't about the players. If you wanna give a clean slate to an organization that doesn't deserve it, fine. The last 12 years gives me every right not to do that. Until they break that streak, this is where I stand on it. You can disagree but then you can't front and understand where I'm coming from.
It might happen next year, Thibs isn't gonna keep trotting a dude out there that can't shoot or finish at the rim, when the guy on the bench will be able to defend and finish. His ability to play in the PnR with Towns and attack the rim off the pick will make Rubio expendable almost immediately, the whole "His backup aint good enough" shyt will go out the window quick
My breh, lets keep it all the way real right now, Ricky Rubio going into his 6th season wouldn't win ROTY next year, so why are you placing that standard on Dunn? You place Rubio right now, as a 6th year vet into this years rookie class and he might make the 2nd rookie team, and I'm not saying that as hyperbole or as a joke either. Rubio is not a top 20 player, he's not an MVP candidate so why does Dunn need to be all those things in his first year to supplant him? If Dunn is a 15/6 guy as a starter that would be better than Rubio, especially since as you pointed out he seems to have the ability to play off the ball, meaning you'd be able to give Towns the ball more in the offense.
It is pessimism, you were talking about Towns when he was in 8th grade, your team drafts him and he looks like a generational big man and you lose all hope? You talked about Dunn for two years before he joined the Wolves, then he joins the Wolves and you're basically saying they should have taken Hield right after I can't understand it because it doesn't make sense, you had more optimism with Rubio & Love as the cornerstones of your franchise than you have now with legitimate talent, it doesn't make any bit of sense.