NASA scientists detect parallel universe 'next to ours' where time runs backwards

Wildhundreds

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
23,701
Reputation
3,892
Daps
99,383
Smh at people not believing this. The ancients has been telling y’all for centuries about the universe and life on earth. I am waiting for them to admit the energies from these planets and constellations do affect our behavior and actions (Astrology, Horoscopes) as above so below


They're probably getting this information from the walls of the pyramids..
 

Emoryal

Superstar
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
12,187
Reputation
315
Daps
19,115
This is actually the opposite of the multiverse theory. It's the big bounce which tries to make the universe finite and cyclical(demonic). You don't need a beginning because it's a loop where one universe runs forward and the other is running backwards. I haven't seen a paper and the entire community will eventually evaluate the validity but this aint anything concrete.
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
27,983
Reputation
9,303
Daps
120,105
I see you NASA

Tryna get operation OBAMAGATE up and running to get us off of this fukked up timeline

:blessed:
 

T-K-G

Veteran
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
37,111
Reputation
5,330
Daps
107,201
Reppin
LWO/Starkset
Honestly, that's why shyt like astronomy and astrophysics doesn't really impress me like that. It's all just educated guesses.
Yet the world you live in uses technology that depends on these guesses :mjlol:


Not impressed with the shyt that literally allows you to most of the things you take for granted :mjlol:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,783
Reputation
8,159
Daps
121,872
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Emoryal said:
This is actually the opposite of the multiverse theory. It's the big bounce which tries to make the universe finite and cyclical(demonic). You don't need a beginning because it's a loop where one universe runs forward and the other is running backwards. I haven't seen a paper and the entire community will eventually evaluate the validity but this aint anything concrete.

You'd still need a 'beginning' that would set up the initial 'Universes' in order for them 'collide and rebound'.​

This is just another iteration of M-theory which is, itself, speculative, but the results of which would match current data. Well, at least it did a few years ago. I thought they were waiting on some tests to see if that theory was feasible, but haven't seen anything about it being confirmed or falsified.​
 
Top