Napoleon's Thoughts on Bernie Sanders

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
25,134
Reputation
6,088
Daps
92,664
Reppin
NULL
with all due respect to everybody here..people tend to revise history when they speak about that crime bill

The streets were KILLING FIELDS in that era
look up the homicide and crime rates for your city in the early 1990s

they PEAKED in that era.

again, with respect to everybody, this site is mourning a fallen member of the fold now...and took action trying to find the culprit

People were losing loved ones the exact same way in that era, and wanted law enforcement to take action solving and preventing future deaths

You younger guys, ask your fathers,uncles or old heads about how much death we dealt with in that period.

Politicians might regret some of the provisions and consequences of the Bill, but we were dying in record numbers
This. That crime bill had strong bipartisan support because murder rates were insane.

All the sentencing shyt was added by repubs and accepted by dems to get it to pass.

Of course sentencing was abused tho because cacs abuse any well intentioned system for racism purposes
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,614
Reputation
14,554
Daps
201,656
Reppin
Above the fray.
This is why it's impossible to discuss the issue in twitter-land with these dumbasses. People make disingenuous arguments and never discuss this in context. I lived in Detroit at the time. It wasn't pretty. There was a huge push and support for something to be done. Black politicians, black community leaders, etc supported the bill. If you want to argue the bill ultimately went too far and was misguided fine. But we cannot have this argument without first discussing how it came to be.

twitter and social media only cares about what happened in the past hour .Context means nothing on social media,which is why I can't fukk with it.
The numbers back up what we're both saying about crime and deaths from that time period.....in case anybody questions our memories..



In terms of Sanders, here's my beef. Him and his supporters love painting him as a perfect saint who has been consistent on everything for 40 years...while simultaneously attacking democrats for voting on things he supported. He voted for the bill, yet wants to act like Clinton and the democrats came up with this bill and he opposed it. I'm tired of the act and I'm tired of democrats not attacking this fraud like he attacks them. Go at him. If you want to fight, fight.

This year, more than any election I can recall............the Dems. are pulling punches when going at each other.All focused on getting Trump out of the paint. Not really dragging each other, for fear of giving the Rep.s ammuniton for the general election.
People have short memories and attention spans, so if a politician revises his record or his past votes, people aren't going to care enough to verify.
 

douche

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
4,104
Reputation
-270
Daps
16,283
Reppin
NULL
The era of Midnight Basketball

with all due respect to everybody here..people tend to revise history when they speak about that crime bill

The streets were KILLING FIELDS in that era
look up the homicide and crime rates for your city in the early 1990s

they PEAKED in that era.

again, with respect to everybody, this site is mourning a fallen member of the fold now...and took action trying to find the culprit

People were losing loved ones the exact same way in that era, and wanted law enforcement to take action solving and preventing future deaths

You younger guys, ask your fathers,uncles or old heads about how much death we dealt with in that period.

Politicians might regret some of the provisions and consequences of the Bill, but we were dying in record numbers
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,916
Reputation
21,143
Daps
128,165
The problem with Sanders is that after that very passionate and correct speech. He voted for it anyway. Which basically meant that white women > black people.

Politically back then, there's no way he could say "I can't vote for the bill because black people would be royally screwed for decades". Rep. Sanders would have been Private Citizen Sanders by the next term. Again,
Which basically meant that white women > black people.

@Get These Nets is absolutely right. Every day on the news they'd be easily 10 stories about black on black crime. Gang violence was at all time highs across the country. Bodies were dropping like iguanas.
 

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,217
Reputation
1,196
Daps
26,692
Reppin
ATL
with all due respect to everybody here..people tend to revise history when they speak about that crime bill

The streets were KILLING FIELDS in that era
look up the homicide and crime rates for your city in the early 1990s

they PEAKED in that era.

again, with respect to everybody, this site is mourning a fallen member of the fold now...and took action trying to find the culprit

People were losing loved ones the exact same way in that era, and wanted law enforcement to take action solving and preventing future deaths

You younger guys, ask your fathers,uncles or old heads about how much death we dealt with in that period.

Politicians might regret some of the provisions and consequences of the Bill, but we were dying in record numbers
THANK YOU.
 

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
19,430
Reputation
2,885
Daps
100,867
Every black city was under siege by violence..
most people wanted something to be done
legislation that was passed caused issues...
this is the real world and things like this happen...
to hold this over the head of every democrat candidate as a negative is bad for democracy
i mean... the challengers of the democrat candidates voted for it too...
so shouldn't that cancel out even discussing it when we start dissecting their history?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,156
Reppin
The Deep State
:wow:




Bernie Sanders praised George Wallace as 'sensitive' in 1972
Bernie Sanders praised George Wallace as 'sensitive' in 1972
by Joseph Simonson
| January 30, 2020 03:05 PM

Seven years after Martin Luther King, Jr. referred to George Wallace as "perhaps the most dangerous racist in America today," a young Bernie Sanders praised the segregationist Alabama governor.

In an interview with the Brattleboro Reformer in 1972, Sanders, then 31, said Wallace "advocates some outrageous approaches to our problems, but at least he is sensitive to what people feel they need."

Sanders, now a Vermont senator and 2020 Democrat, said, "What we need are more active politicians working for the people."

The 1972 remarks surprised the interviewer at the time, who wrote that "even though [Sanders] has been labeled a 'leftist radical' by some persons, Sanders had some praise for [Wallace]."

At the time, Sanders was in the midst of his first political bid, as a gubernatorial candidate for the socialist Liberty Union Party. During that race, Sanders garnered only single-digit support — the first in a series of losses in bids for political office, before winning the Burlington mayor's office, Vermont's single House seat in 1990, and his current Senate seat in 2006.

Wallace was among the most well-known segregationists of his era. Wallace declared in his 1963 inaugural address as governor — he served three different non-consecutive terms — that he stood for "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." Wallace won further infamy for standing in the front of the entrance of the University of Alabama, blocking the paths of black students.

He died in 1998 at 79, after becoming a born-again Christian and apologizing to black Americans for his previous policies.

The resurfacing of Sanders's comments come after many Democrats begin fearing his rise in the presidential primary. For nearly a year, most of Sanders's rivals have refrained from directly targeting his long paper trail of controversial statements and positions.

While there was a bipartisan consensus in the 1970s and 1980s against the totalitarian policies of the Soviet Union and Cuba, Sanders regularly touted what he saw as positive aspects of the regimes.

And last year, the Washington Examiner reported on Sanders's history campaigning for the Marxist Socialist Workers party in 1980 and 1984. At one point, Sanders's involvement with the SWP led to an FBI investigation when he was mayor of Burlington, Vermont.

Never an official member of the Democratic Party until his presidential bids in 2016 and 2020, many primary voters view his presidential bids with suspicion.

Sanders never endorsed a Democratic presidential candidate until 1988, when he first had his eyes on federal office. That year, he backed Jesse Jackson. Sanders was first elected to Congress as an independent in 1990 after a failed House bid two years earlier.

Despite his rivals attempting to capitalize on Sanders's past, other Democratic White House hopefuls have their own racial-tinged history to grapple with.

In 1975, then-Delaware Sen. Joe Biden told the Philadelphia Enquirer that "the Democratic Party could stand a liberal George Wallace."

The following year, however, Biden vowed not to back Wallace should he win the Democratic Party's nomination.

"If Wallace got the [Democratic nomination], I would support the republican nominee, if it were Gerald Ford," said Biden, then 34 and in the fourth year of his 36-year Senate career, before two terms as President Barack Obama's vice president.

In 1974, Biden also pledged to stop Wallace from winning the nomination in the next presidential race.

"Over my dead political body is George Wallace going to get it," Biden said.






@Red Shield @Michael's Black Son @Sukairain @YouMadd? @Basil of Baker Street @SupremexKing @Clutch Robinson @Cat piss martini @AndroidHero @Pirius Black @ba'al @panopticon @johnedwarduado @SJUGRAD13
 
Top