Namibian Whites Shocked And Bemused That Native Black Want Their Land Back

[Northern Son]

This is true but he's cutting off the resources they used to steal and its hurting them economically. The root of the problem is that African Leaders need to get on code. The government my not directly kick them out, that's what Black Operations are for.

I think they have a long term plan to form a country with Niger and Mali, then eventually join BRICS. Once they dump the CFA Franc and establish trading partnerships with non-Western aligned countries, they should see massive growth.

 

[3rdWorld]

We are not at ALL on an even playing field. The game is completely rigged. I’ve been trying to get this through to Coli users, but there are rules for Africans (and most non-whites) that 100% do not apply to cacs. Israel is committing a comical amount of war crimes and receives unwavering support from the entire West (the RULERS of the unipolar world we live in). There are no actual rules; just what the West likes and what the West doesn’t like.

Kicking out or attacking whites is just begging for the West to destroy your country with embargoes, sanctions, pulled aid etc. and the CIA will probably putsch your leader and install an obedient c00n. Obviously citizen violence against whites will just result in arrests.

I hate it too, but the world is not simply not in favour of Black progress, but actively against it.

Burkina Faso’s president (legit African hero) Ibrahim Traore recently kicked out the French, and they predictably sanctioned his country. They have tried to assassinate him SEVENTEEN times because he smartly aligned with Russia and cut ties with Western debt trappers like the IMF and World Bank. What did Traore do wrong? He hasn't committed any terror or exploited any population, yet the French vilify him and don't recognize his government. It's all about hegemony, and independent Africans/Blacks threatens that.

The West makes too much money off of the exploitation of Africa to let Namibian Black people just up and kill cacs and take their resources back.

I hear you loud and clear breh, but you need to hear me out as well.
We can no longer allow ourselves to be dominated against in our own home in the interest of "good relations" with rich Europe.
Africa has to now be wholly secured for African children's future.

I don't have a problem with Europe expelling Africans and saying they're full or hate the sight of Blacks..it's their home, they decide what's best for themselves.
But understand, we also reserve the right and are not European subjects or property.
We can all fukk off back to where we came from.
Africans don't benefit shyt from having European settlers in Africa, so we have no need for them just as they have no need for us in Europe.
We will be just fine when they're gone.

 

[TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?]

Take it back

 

[CopiousX]

I don't get it. They could collectively as a group strong arm those CACs and take their shyt back.

@Northern Son is right. It's about the long game . It's a pyrrhic victory.


What's the point of having that land back if the whole nation is buried under sanctions like Zimbabwe , as your citizens fall into poverty and become refugees in the surrounding countries?


The modern economy is about global cooperation and integration with these white nations. The alternative is to be North Korea or Venezuela or Iran or Zimbabwe.

 

[Mowgli]

Need financial, agricultural, textile and construction training

 

[Wiseborn]

The collective West (European Union, North America, Australia) will destroy your economy with sanctions and plunge the country into insurmountable disaster if you try anything like that (see Zimbabwe). Global hegemony/white supremacy works against any and all forms of Black or Indigenous autonomy. Most African leaders are Western plants, so they will ignore or support Western imposed sanctions.

True but that's why they get away with it, by being on Code, Time for Africans to be on Code too.

Namibia is actually rich they could weather sanctions.

 

[Wiseborn]

@Northern Son is right. It's about the long game . It's a pyrrhic victory.


What's the point of having that land back if the whole nation is buried under sanctions like Zimbabwe , as your citizens fall into poverty and become refugees in the surrounding countries?


The modern economy is about global cooperation and integration with these white nations. The alternative is to be North Korea or Venezuela or Iran or Zimbabwe.

Africa isn't really in the so called "global economy. So it doesn't matter.

But if you feel this way I'm sure that you'd be against reparations for ADOS since it would cause inflation.

 

[CopiousX]

I hear you loud and clear breh, but you need to hear me out as well.
We can no longer allow ourselves to be dominated against in our own home in the interest of "good relations" with rich Europe.
Africa has to now be wholly secured for African children's future.

I don't have a problem with Europe expelling Africans and saying they're full or hate the sight of Blacks..it's their home, they decide what's best for themselves.
But understand, we also reserve the right and are not European subjects or property.
We can all fukk off back to where we came from.
Africans don't benefit shyt from having European settlers in Africa, so we have no need for them just as they have no need for us in Europe.
We will be just fine when they're gone.

The ideology sounds nice, but it's a Pyrrhic victory than a mofo. Assuming they didn't just drop a drone on your head under trumped up humanitarian charges, your life as a leader will be worse afterwards . Same for your people. It's about pragmatism


Land reclaimation is like having all the food in the world, but catching stomach cancer.


Those little diamond and uranium exports Namibia has would be useless to them when they are locked out of the swift financial system like Russia is currently, and anybody that violates western mandate to trade with them gets sanctioned similarly.

 

[Yzak]

@Northern Son is right. It's about the long game . It's a pyrrhic victory.


What's the point of having that land back if the whole nation is buried under sanctions like Zimbabwe , as your citizens fall into poverty and become refugees in the surrounding countries?


The modern economy is about global cooperation and integration with these white nations. The alternative is to be North Korea or Venezuela or Iran or Zimbabwe.

Why does resource rich Africa need to fear sanctions from cacs?

 

[Wiseborn]

The ideology sounds nice, but it's a Pyrrhic victory than a mofo. Assuming they didn't just drop a drone on your head under trumped up humanitarian charges, your life as a leader will be worse afterwards . Same for your people. It's about pragmatism


Land reclaimation is like having all the food in the world, but catching stomach cancer.


Those little diamond and uranium exports Namibia has would be useless to them when they are locked out of the swift financial system like Russia is currently, and anybody that violates western mandate to trade with them gets sanctioned similarly.

The ship that was attacked in the Red Sea was Russian Oil that was bought by Singapore.


Everyone bought shyt from South Africa under aparthied and best believe that France will continue to source Uraniam from Mail.

The US government gives companies money to buy strategic minerals from countries don't get more Strategic than Uranium.

Diamonds are bought by the Debeers company solely so they can regulate the price of Diamonds.

 

[CopiousX]

Why does resource rich Africa need to fear sanctions from cacs?

The modern world is built on cooperation unless you wish to live in the stone ages like Cambodia and Vietnam did when they attempted what you are insinuating in the 60s and 70s independent of the world economy.


Resources alone are useless cause you need inputs (both intellectual and physical) to refine and process them. These inputs are globally distributed and specialized. No country on earth, has all the resources within its borders to build modern cars or computers or geothermal turbines. For example, congo has the raw materials to build the previously discussed items . But congo lacks the intellectual inputs processes (refined materials , semiconductors, academics to design, spare parts, patent rights, etc). The significance of the sanctions after the pyrrhic land grab is that any foreign body or individual that gives you these inputs faces their own sanctions .


There are parts necessary to build every modern convenience that are only manufactured by one country and only that one country has the trade secrets and expertise to create them. In order for Africa to even make a car , they MUST trade with Western ally Taiwan semiconductor. (Not optional) . Look at how even the mighty better resourced , EU, US , Chinese, and Russian economies stagnated in absense of this supply during COVID. See how Russia and China still struggle today because of this single part



There are thousands of non-substitutable inputs like this that make trade mandatory. When the west turns off the tap and nobody will trade with you



Btw, what you are describing was attempted in the past by several African nations under "import substitution" and it failed miserably. Tanzania is one example

 

[Nkrumah Was Right]

That’s not how the world works.

I thought you were Zimbabwean? Don't you have first-hand experience in chasing out cacs?

 

[Nkrumah Was Right]

@Northern Son is right. It's about the long game . It's a pyrrhic victory.


What's the point of having that land back if the whole nation is buried under sanctions like Zimbabwe , as your citizens fall into poverty and become refugees in the surrounding countries?


The modern economy is about global cooperation and integration with these white nations. The alternative is to be North Korea or Venezuela or Iran or Zimbabwe.

The long game is controlling the land, not avoiding sanctions. Eventually, the sanctions will be evaded, rendered moot due to multipolarity, or removed because of other geopolitical events.

When cacs still control the land and its resources, you are losing and will continue to lose. That's why Black people in South Africa feel like they lost post-Apartheid. At least Zimbabweans, though poor, control the foundations for a black-run economy.

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

Y’all don’t believe the injuns here deserve their land back

 

[Northern Son]

I thought you were Zimbabwean? Don't you have first-hand experience in chasing out cacs?

Yes of course, but kicking out cacs without finding powerful partners (Russia) first led to Zimbabwe being annihilated by sanctions and becoming one of the poorest countries on Earth. Obviously long term being free but suffering temporarily is preferable to South Africa and Namibia’s perpetual/permanent slavery and servitude, but the way The AES is doing it is the correct way. Get credible likeminded allies both on the continent and abroad first before challenging cacs and Western white supremacy. Zimbabwe was isolated and treated like a pariah by the West which it unfortunately fully depended on.

Planning matters and it’s imperative to have allies who are also from the Global South.