My Posse's On Broadway: Official NY Knicks 2016-2017 Season Thread

ikbm

Formerly ikillbabymamas
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,866
Reputation
6,740
Daps
79,597
Reppin
Spread Love - The Player Way
If not him, then markanan?
he mentions a guy that doesnt use athleticism on offense...and you suggest we draft a shorter kristaps thats worse at rebounding and defense.
:francis: he's polished offensively...and nothing else :francis:
the team needs guards or wings.
edit: a 7 footer in college should not average .5 blocks a game.
i'm sorry. players are much smaller at that level...it should be easier.
 
Last edited:

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
If not him, then markanan?

he mentions a guy that doesnt use athleticism on offense...and you suggest we draft a shorter kristaps thats worse at rebounding and defense.
:francis: he's polished offensively...and nothing else :francis:
the team needs guards or wings.
edit: a 7 footer in college should not average .5 blocks a game.
i'm sorry. players are much smaller at that level...it should be easier.


If they're gonna go with a big, I'd rather they choose Isaac or Patton or Allen... If they're gonna pick a guard, I think Smith or Frank and then Monk/Fox -- I think. I really like fox and monk, I just have concerns about what kind of ceiling they hit.
 

ikbm

Formerly ikillbabymamas
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,866
Reputation
6,740
Daps
79,597
Reppin
Spread Love - The Player Way
If they're gonna go with a big, I'd rather they choose Isaac or Patton or Allen... If they're gonna pick a guard, I think Smith or Frank and then Monk/Fox -- I think. I really like fox and monk, I just have concerns about what kind of ceiling they hit.
problem is we alread have a plethora of bigs on this roster going into next year...and those are reaches if we get a pick in the 4-7 range.
i feel like fox has a higher ceiling....and monk is more polished right now
fox idolizes westbrook...so its kinda nice seeing someone with a motor like his....and the athletic explosiveness he already has. may not be westbrook level...but he's up there.
 

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
problem is we alread have a plethora of bigs on this roster going into next year...


Yeah, but who cares? One of them is star caliber, the others range from starters to backups. If they wanna go ultra length, and positionless basketball -- Isaac is right there as a guy who can play anywhere between 3-5.

Clearly guard is the weakest part of our team. But after Fultz everyone has questions, there's no real top 3-5. Ball, Tatum, Jackson, Fox, Monk, Smith, Isaac could be interchangeable based on workouts/hype.
 

ikbm

Formerly ikillbabymamas
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,866
Reputation
6,740
Daps
79,597
Reppin
Spread Love - The Player Way
Yeah, but who cares? One of them is star caliber, the others range from starters to backups. If they wanna go ultra length, and positionless basketball -- Isaac is right there as a guy who can play anywhere between 3-5.

Clearly guard is the weakest part of our team. But after Fultz everyone has questions, there's no real top 3-5. Ball, Tatum, Jackson, Fox, Monk, Smith, Isaac could be interchangeable based on workouts/hype.
ehh true...but i did state....we need guards or wings....and isaac fits the mold of a durant-like 3... physically and skill wise.
he aint really a big in the traditional sense...like the other two men you suggested. those would be the reaches.
 

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
ehh true...but i did state....we need guards or wings....and isaac fits the mold of a durant-like 3... physically and skill wise.
he aint really a big in the traditional sense...like the other two men you suggested. those would be the reaches.


Maybe. Ultimately you gotta go BPA, because this team sucks. Isaac is damn near 7 feet tall, probably ends up best as a 4/5.

The problem is they need everything, pretty much EXCEPT for whatever position you play porzingis at. They just need talent.
 

Kang Deezy

Overall Nice Guy
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
20,242
Reputation
-7,900
Daps
19,512
Reppin
The stoop with dat dope fanny padding
Yeah, but who cares? One of them is star caliber, the others range from starters to backups. If they wanna go ultra length, and positionless basketball -- Isaac is right there as a guy who can play anywhere between 3-5.

Clearly guard is the weakest part of our team. But after Fultz everyone has questions, there's no real top 3-5. Ball, Tatum, Jackson, Fox, Monk, Smith, Isaac could be interchangeable based on workouts/hype.

There's no way Ball goes past two

Even if the team with the second pick doesn't want Ball they are gonna say they do til the last second to squeeze something out the lakers via trade
 

I.V.

Keep this Fire
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
7,056
Reputation
2,220
Daps
17,747
There's no way Ball goes past two

Even if the team with the second pick doesn't want Ball they are gonna say they do til the last second to squeeze something out the lakers via trade


Oh absolutely, but my point is that I think Fultz is the most complete player.

Everyone else has questions. I think they go 1/2 -- but if Phoenix got the 2, it would actually get very interesting very fast.
 
Top