My Political Beliefs

[acri1]

We get it, you hate liberals and felt like whining about it.

Plagiarizing somebody's nonsensical "political beliefs" doesn't exactly help your case.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

this is some of the gayest most self indulgent shyt i've ever read on this board

 

[Beegio]

Progressivism

Progressivism (also called Universalism) is responsible for the vast majority of the world's problems today. It is a non-theistic religion descended in a direct line from the various Dissenter sects of England. Although the belief in God was dropped during the religion's evolution in order to improve its ability to spread, the core of progressive beliefs are very similar to the Quaker beliefs of a few centuries ago. In short, progressives are dangerous and creepy religious maniacs who don't need to believe in God but that makes them no less dangerous, creepy or maniacal.

The conflict between progressivism and conservatism

Progressivism always wins in the long run. Conservatism can at most slow down the implementation of selected progressive ideas. This is because progressives dominate the universities, media and non-governmental organizations which allows them to mold public opinion. Progressives dominate those institutions because progressivism is a far more attractive ideology for people who are intelligent, ambitious and status-seeking. In the US conservatives are largely members of Protestant sects of American origin (mostly Evangelical sects) whereas progressives are the spiritual descendants of the English dissenters, so this conflict is essentially a religious one.

The US government

The Presidency and Congress are mainly ceremonial. The US is governed mainly by the permanent civil service bureaucracy although the real decisions are made at elite universities and then spread by the media and by non-governmental organizations. The universities, media and NGOs are all essential elements of the de facto government, which is referred to as the Polygon or the Cathedral. There is no conspiracy involved - the system is self-organized and self-perpetuating with no need for central leadership.

The military

Militaries are the only institutions with any importance or power which is not dominated by progressives. Because of this progressives burden the military with rules of engagement which make victory impossible and then use left-wing insurgencies or adventures in foreign countries to defeat the military in proxy wars.

Political parties

In a democracy with two major political parties, the more progressive party is referred to as the Inner Party and the more conservative party is the Outer Party. Supporting the Outer Party in any way is not an effective strategy against progressivism.

International relations

The US essentially runs the world since the aftermath of World War II. Many military conflicts around the world are usually best understood proxy wars in the struggle between progressivism and conservatism. What progressives refer to as independence means total dependence on the US. The current system should be replaced by a return to classical international law with all non-nuclear countries becoming client states of nuclear countries.

Insurgency

There has never been a successful right-wing insurgency in the XX century with the possible exception of Franco. Left-wing insurgencies can succeed as progressive auxillaries in the progressive-conservative in another (more powerful) country.

Activism

Progressive political activism is directed against the elected government and supports the unelected civil service bureaucracy. Anti-American political activism consists of pressuring the US to live up to its own progressive ideals, and therefore is more accurately called ultra-Americanism. Both are effective methods of influencing US government policy in the progressive direction.

Castes

In an earlier version, the population of the US was divided into five castes: Brahmin, Optimate, Vaisya, Helot and Dalit. In the new, simplified version we have Eloi, Morlocks and Proles. A caste is a large social group with its own internal rules for ranking social status. The Eloi or Brahmin are the well-educated progressive elites. The Proles or Vaisyas are regular people who work for a living. The Morlocks or Dalits are the underclass supported by crime and/or welfare. The Optimates are the remnants of the old WASP elites and Southern aristocracy, but they no longer are of any importance - in the simplified version they have either joined the Eloi or become Proles. The Helots are unskilled laborers, largely of Mexican origin - they've been split up between the Proles and the Morlocks in the simplified version.

Crime

The criminal underclass is a military auxillary of the progressives. The criminals see themselves as taking what's rightfully theirs and waging war against an unjust society. Progressives enable and support this war by supporting ineffective crime policy.

Removing a democracy

The removal of a democratic government is called a restoration. It cannot be accomplished by forming a political party and winning elections. It can be achieved either by military coup or by making democracy sufficiently unpopular. The latter can be done by convincing sufficiently large numbers of the public that progressivism is a harmful and untruthful ideology.

Replacing a democracy

Democracy should be replaced by a temporary government headed by a Receiver with plenary powers which acts similar to what is done in a corporate bankruptcy - sells off assets and restructures. The future shape of government is left up to the temporary government but in order to prevent progressivism from taking over the new government, all parts of the Cathedral should be dissolved.

Neocameralism

The preferred alternative to democracy is neocameralism in which the government is a joint-stock corporation with ownership of the country and the goal of maximizing profits.

Please discuss. Thank you.

OP before getting caught plagiarizing

Yes, i should have originally posted a link, i did not mean for it to look like i plagiarized these ideas. By "my political beliefs" what i meant to say was "I also agree with this" Stupid mistake by me, i simply wanted to bring some different ideas to the forum. I find it interesting that Hebrew Israelite & Racial huckster threads are constantly upped with no aggressive resistance but anytime someone goes against the political frame here they are treated like a piece of shyt. If you think i am stupid that is fine, if you think Moldbugs stuff is stupid that is also fine, at least i am talking about stuff( or copy and pasting stuff) that falls within the political spectrum.

OP after getting caught plagiarizing

Spoiler

@Odyssey I believe you left this

 

[Broke Wave]

A political and social movement premised on fact-based economics is "a religion without god" according to the OP.

Be autistic brehs.

 

[Odyssey]

Haha, yeah, you guys are right, i am a total scumbag. How many posts do you guys think that Hebrew Israelite thread will get? Hey! would anyone like to discuss the links i posted? Oh and i am not Gundum. Gundum had a lot of issue's with race/his family, honestly it was quite bizarre. The only thing i agree with him about is the progressive left being authoritarian statists who champion collectivism over individuality.

 

[Odyssey]

A political and social movement premised on fact-based economics is "a religion without god" according to the OP.

Be autistic brehs.

"It is a non-theistic religion descended in a direct line from the various Dissenter sects of England." Do you think this has any historical truth to it?

"whereas progressives are the spiritual descendants of the English dissenters"

Thoughts?

 

[Lana Kane]

what are we discussing?

 

[Odyssey]

http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.ca/2009/01/gentle-introduction-to-unqualified.html

Thoughts?

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

@Odyssey

 

[Odyssey]

Che's Grandfather? That's cool, Dom. You read any of the links i posted?

 

[Blackking]

damn,this shyt was a fail. And u could have just posted it and debated it. .... instead u fukked ur self.







And it makes no sense that PROgressives would be the spiritual descendants.

 

[Odyssey]

The stuff i posted could still be debated. I am starting to think most of you have reading difficulties.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

The stuff i posted could still be debated. I am starting to think most of you have reading difficulties.

The problem with what you posted (minus that fact that it's some bum's blog entry that you plagiarized and called "my political beliefs) is that it operates from a bunch of seemingly absurd, off-based assumptions that are not fleshed out in the first place in the blog entry. The author may have explained them elsewhere, and the blog entry is just a summary of his worldview. But when status claims like "progressivism is universalism and a religion without a God" are presented, perhaps there needs to be a reasoned thesis of how one can come to that conclusion first before you start requesting a critique of it.

Maybe you can do that. Maybe you can explain what about these ideas resonate with you so much that you started a thread called "My political beliefs." Or are you incapable of any independent thought?

 

[Beegio]

The stuff i posted could still be debated. I am starting to think most of you have reading difficulties.

Have you no shame?

Lets discuss that.

 

[Odyssey]

Have you no shame?

Lets discuss that.

Actually, i don't! Haven't i explained to you guys how much of scummy piece of shyt i am? Anyone that has any dissenting viewpoint, from economics to politics to the role of democracy is most certainly a clown.

The hilarious thing about my "plagiarism" troll job is that Vic & others seem to have plagiarized their entire worldview to match that of the Democratic Parties agenda. No one else find this..bizarre?

Man i am such a fakkit for having different views and ideas!

Hey! Did any white men get killed today, it's a lot more fun to talk about CACS!