ogc163
Superstar
because it snt in the interests of the land developmers to build housing for someone thats "affordable"
housing is tied up in investment and that value is used to maximize portfolios and assets ...IOW if the real estate/housing has high value then they in turn have increased value as an asset
increased housing supply means what? lower value
and if my wealth is dependant on the valuation of my real estate holdings then im not gonna do that
if you only cater to the upper third of people who can easily afford homes /apts - then you can be assured of steady revenue( ie people who can pay a mortgage / rent ) - it means you are always supporting things like the housing supply mkt because builders and construction will have a steady stream of higher end construction to complete- a limited amount of building for only high end construction means they can charge more for projects it also means an increase demand on supplies which means again revenue for supplies will increase....think about even now whats happened to the secondary mkt for homes - you can put your home up for sale and it can be sold in a week not months or years like what occured in 2008 .... increased housing value means theres more in the form of taxes that the govt can collect- if most of your homes are valued at 300K or more - it would be terrible for those homes to lose value by increased supply because that means less taxes that can be collected....
building for what the lower or lowest earners can afford just means a lot of institutions civil and investment would undercut their monentary intrests because they need real estate to make a profit-
real estate firms and investment companies would be shooting them selves in the foot creating a massive amount of housing in the form of increased amounts of apts or increased single family homes-
it would be great of people who dont earn much because prices would fall - but from a rich persons perspective- why the fukk would they care about what people who cant afford much can easily do or dont do? or want a falling price for what they want to make the most profit off of???
This whole post defies basic concepts like supply, demand, and most importantly opportunity costs. There are several reasons why more housing hasn't been built and you decided to focus on the low hanging fruit with the predictable greedy developers trope.
Smh this board is sorely lacking in original thought.