Muslim's Muhammad Was White

[Michael9100]

Don't pay @Michael9100 any attention he's just a sad troll Even though I'm not Muslim I do have a Quran in my room. I should read it

smh.....I'm trying to help you!

 

[lini...]

He was white skinned and described as a white man several times. Shame that most of the Muslims on here are ashamed of this, when the correct response would be "so what?" [credit to the one Muslim poster who said this]. The rest are ashamed of their prophet, even posting interpretation paintings of the prophet (which I thought were not allowed in the first place). The following are not my words and not my interpretation:

Narrated Anas bin Malik: While we were sitting with the Prophet in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made his camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said: "Who amongst you is Muhammad?" At that time the Prophet was sitting amongst us (his companions) leaning on his arm. We replied, "This white man reclining on his arm." The an then addressed him, "O Son of 'Abdul Muttalib."...
Click to expand...​

Sahih Bukhari1:3:63

Narrated 'Abdullah bin Dinar: My father said, "I heard Ibn 'Umar reciting the poetic verses of Abu Talib: And a white (person) (i.e. the Prophet) who is requested to pray for rain and who takes care of the orphans and is the guardian of widows." Salim's father (Ibn 'Umar) said, "The following poetic verse occurred to my mind while I was looking at the face of the Prophet (p.b.u.h) while he was praying for rain. He did not get down till the rain water flowed profusely from every roof-g utter: And a white (person) who is requested to pray for rain and who takes care of the orphans and is the guardian of widows . . . And these were the words of Abu Talib."
Click to expand...​

Sahih Bukhari2:17:122

Narrated Isma'il bin Abi Khalid: I heard Abii Juhaifa saying, "I saw the Prophet, and Al-Hasan bin 'Ali resembled him." I said to Abu- Juhaifa, "Describe him for me." He said, "He was white and his beard was black with some white hair. He promised to give us 13 young she-camels, but he expired before we could get them."
Click to expand...​

Sahih Bukhari4:56:744

Abu Tufail reported: I saw Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and there is one amongst the people of the earth who (are living at the present time and) had seen him except me. I said to him: How did you find him? He said: He had an elegant white color, and he was of an average height.
Click to expand...​

Sahih Muslim30:5778

Narrated Al-Muttalib: When Uthman ibn Maz'un died, he was brought out on his bier and buried. The Prophet (peace be upon him) ordered a man to bring him a stone, but he was unable to carry it. The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) got up and going over to it rolled up his sleeves. The narrator Kathir told that al-Muttalib remarked: The one who told me about the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) said: I still seem to see the whiteness of the forearms of the Apostle of Allah(peace be upon him) when he rolled up his sleeves. He then carried it and placed it at his head saying: I am marking my brother's grave with it, and I shall bury beside him those of my family who die.
Click to expand...​

Abu Dawud20:3200



Don't even get me started on the revisionist "She was really 15" bullshyt.

So you believe in the Hadith?

 

[lini...]

All sources documented.

Thsnnor,

David Wood is a dishonest person. Anyone who bases their entire argument against Al-Islam on Hadith and biographies are not honest people, particularly Christians who do so. I've seen him in debate and I know someone who has debated him and I offered to debate him and his elk. They would not fare well because they are dishonest. If I say that I only believe in the Hadiths which correspond to and are corroborated by the Qur'an, 95% of their arguments would disappear. Just as would be the case with Typeusername's argument on Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) skin color or Aisha's age. Because he and they know that the Hadiths are not infallible and they know that there is no Muslim on earth who believes that the Hadiths are inerrant. So to base your argument solely on them is a losing effort, unless you somehow confess your opponent to defend them. Not to mention, Hadiths say differing things, on the same topic. How do they determine, which one is true? And why do they select one Hadith over another. They believe that Muhammad sleep with a child, but nothing else. Sounds like selective bias to me.

 

[Thsnnor]

Thsnnor,

David Wood is a dishonest person. Anyone who bases their entire argument against Al-Islam on Hadith and biographies are not honest people, particularly Christians who do so. I've seen him in debate and I know someone who has debated him and I offered to debate him and his elk. They would not fare well because they are dishonest. If I say that I only believe in the Hadiths which correspond to and are corroborated by the Qur'an, 95% of their arguments would disappear. Just as would be the case with Typeusername's argument on Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) skin color or Aisha's age. Because he and they know that the Hadiths are not infallible and they know that there is no Muslim on earth who believes that the Hadiths are inerrant. So to base your argument solely on them is a losing effort, unless you somehow confess your opponent to defend them. Not to mention, Hadiths say differing things, on the same topic. How do they determine, which one is true? And why do they select one Hadith over another. They believe that Muhammad sleep with a child, but nothing else. Sounds like selective bias to me.

That video was the one that h the most documented sources. I've dealt with strong Hadiths vs weak ones. The main issue is what is the main source of authority.

If for you it's the Koran then cool. If it's the Koran and Hadiths cool. I bring this up because if there is a conflict what wins out in the end?

If someone is always needed to interpret the Koran would they then be greater than the Koran? Kinda like Jehovas Witnesses always need to see what the Watchtower says first.

 

[lini...]

That video was the one that h the most documented sources. I've dealt with strong Hadiths vs weak ones. The main issue is what is the main source of authority.

If for you it's the Koran then cool. If it's the Koran and Hadiths cool. I bring this up because if there is a conflict what wins out in the end?

If someone is always needed to interpret the Koran would they then be greater than the Koran? Kinda like Jehovas Witnesses always need to see what the Watchtower says first.

It is ALWAYS, ALWAYS the Qur'an! It is called the Criterion because it is the measurement stick by which other scriptures are measured, including Hadith. I do understand your confusion, because Muslim get it confused as well. The Qur'an tells you what to do. The Hadith tells you how to do it. The Prophet's life was the living Qur'an. So if something is in the Hadith, but nowhere in the Qur'an, a Muslim should be suspicious of it.