Stick at it my guy.I’m learning guitar rn and the dude is tryna teach music theory to me
How to read music notes and shyt, I’m feeling off about it
All the chords, progressions, and shyt
Exactly, "music theory" as it is isn't helpful in our tradition with it's focus on keys, chord progressions, scales, meters and shyt. From the very beginning with lets say blues we pretty much broke all of the conventional rules of it.
Not only that but "harmony" in our music tends to be centered on things they call timbre, pitch, and textures.
Things like the swing rhythm and groove can't even be properly notated in musical theory because it's more a rhythmic 'feel' than a rhythmic structure. It can "feel" more like triplet notes at slower tempos, but at faster tempos they tend to 'feel' more like straight notes.
Ornette Coleman actively tried to COMPLETELY dismantle "music theory" conventions with his own theory of harmolodics. Which ironically tends to focus more on textures of harmony than shyt like chords progressions
Harmolodics - Wikipedia
I think every aados artist should at least give this a cursory study, along with avant grade and John Coltrane.
recently i found this book that is loosely related to your questionThinking on this I think the only way to properly teach Black American forms of music in a formal setting is taking a "sound before symbols" approach and the theory should be continuously shaped/adjusted/revised to fit the music NOT the other way around as it so often is in the western tradition. Emphasis should be placed on ear training and playing by ear THEN give students tools in the form of notation to notate the music they play and hear not attempting to play based on notation.
@IllmaticDelta Thought?
@Insensitive
recently i found this book that is loosely related to your question
Ancient Traditions Future Possibilities: Rhythmic Training through the Traditions of Africa, Bali, and India | by Matthew Montfort. | download
Ancient Traditions Future Possibilities: Rhythmic Training through the Traditions of Africa, Bali, and India
by Matthew Montfort.
This book is designed to fill a need for basic rhythmic training through the study of the rhythmic traditions of Africa, Bali and India. While European classical music emphasized the development of harmony, musicians in cultures such as those of Africa, Bali and India developed rhythm to a very advanced degree. Today, there is an increasing interest among contemporary Western musicians in expanding their awareness of these great oral traditions. Jazz, jazz-rock and contemporary classical music have been absorbing many ethnic musical influences through the work of such artists as Don Cherry, John McLaughlin, Oregon, Paul Winter Consort, Do'a, Terry Riley, Steve Reich, and the authors own ensemble, Ancient Future. Contemporary musicians have a unique opportunity to broaden their knowledge and skills through studying the music of cultures foreign to their upbringing.
Thinking on this I think the only way to properly teach Black American forms of music in a formal setting is taking a "sound before symbols" approach and the theory should be continuously shaped/adjusted/revised to fit the music NOT the other way around as it so often is in the western tradition. Emphasis should be placed on ear training and playing by ear THEN give students tools in the form of notation to notate the music they play and hear not attempting to play based on notation.
@IllmaticDelta Thought?
@Insensitive
Most non western music traditions are played by ear. I agree in that should be the foundation of learning before learning symbols.
But black american music doesn't necessarily emphasize rhythm over everything like in "forest" African/india/SE asia traditions. If I had to layout the most important aspects of BA music, it would be a swing feel, synocopation, improvisation, and bluesy feels/forms. Everything else is usually built/expanded off that.
Plus we can simply study our own tradition to see what it means to learn through ear training and feel. Learning about difference cultures is cool, but we don't need to base our theory/pedagogy/knowledge of music on them. Our own tradition provides us all the foundation that we need.
heavy facts!!!
I agree and I disagree.Most non western music traditions are played by ear. I agree in that should be the foundation of learning before learning symbols.
But black american music doesn't necessarily emphasize rhythm over everything like in "forest" African/india/SE asia traditions. If I had to layout the most important aspects of BA music, it would be a swing feel, synocopation, improvisation, and bluesy feels/forms. Everything else is usually built/expanded off that.
Plus we can simply study our own tradition to see what it means to learn through ear training and feel. Learning about difference cultures is cool, but we don't need to base our theory/pedagogy/knowledge of music on them. Our own tradition provides us all the foundation that we need.
Thinking on this I think the only way to properly teach Black American forms of music in a formal setting is taking a "sound before symbols" approach and the theory should be continuously shaped/adjusted/revised to fit the music NOT the other way around as it so often is in the western tradition. Emphasis should be placed on ear training and playing by ear THEN give students tools in the form of notation to notate the music they play and hear not attempting to play based on notation.
@IllmaticDelta Thought?
@Insensitive
also @Insensitive
the part I marked off talks about jazz using different written musical notations from the classical/western standard and then it goes into the listening to internalize the "feel"