Mortality Rate 50% Higher with More Vaccine Doses

[ExodusNirvana]

Natural selection... don't vaccinate your kids. Makes my kids lives easier, less competition

When your little snot nosed disease bags fade off, smaller classes, better teaching, better genes available for the future.

Its the ciiiiircle of liiiiiife

 

[Liu Kang]

So I read your article and then wanted to read the study.

- Here's the link for the raw data : data
- Here's the complete study, for those who are interested : Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990
- Here's the complete study in PDF : http://www.medicinenaturali.net/vaccini/Vaccines_damages_2012.full.pdf
- Here's a link to a Javascript script made by the researchers where you can select the data as you wish : VAERS Database Analysis

-> Something that should be noted (IMO) is that of one of the two co authors of the study (Goldman and Miller), one is associated with Think Twice Global Vaccine Institute as mentioned in the online article.

 

[MBwithadream]

Yea I wish my sons mother(s) wouldn't do this. I don't take sh1t. No medicine, vaccinations, nothing man made other than probably some poison or pesticides from fruit n sh1t.

I have to be one of the few people that went to Iraq without taking any shot, not even anthrax. I make excuses, reasons, medical reasons.. have been making up sh1t since I was very young.

And I'm not scared of shots. I just don't trust people, especially cac. A whole bunch of water and a hot bath cures a cold for me. I drank the water in Mexico, Iraq, and a couple places in Africa... after they said don't drink the water.
I feel like if you live life you will build up natural defenses. I was shot in the neck before, stabbed twice, totaled a car that caught on fire with me in it, and have been exposed to dangerous chemicals, smashed many a ratchet pusysy, worked in hospitals, etc. (I know this sounds crazy) but God gives you everything that you need to survive - in your body and growing from the Earth.

 

[Liu Kang]

For those who wanna go further :

I use the javascript program they did (http://www.medicalveritas.com/vaers.php) to recreate the study data.
- Age : 0 < 1 (this is the "infant" age span)
- Doses count : All doses (1-15)
- Report events : Deaths (we are talking about mortality so...)
- Combine years : 1990 to 2009 (and combine 2010 to 2010
- Ignore cases with doses : 16 and higher

The flaws of the article IMO :
#1 . Millions of infants are vaccinated, make your ratio.

#2 . The article is super biased :

The second four vaccine doses, 5-8, are resulting in 50% more deaths than the first four doses, 1-4. When we also consider the likelihood that there are 50-100 times more adverse reactions than reported, what this study reveals is frightening:

1,458 deaths at 5-8 doses &#8211; 423 deaths at 1-4 doses = 1,035 extra deaths for doubling the number of doses.

Multiply that by 50 and you have 51,750 extra deaths simply for giving 5-8 vaccine doses, instead of 1-4 doses, at one time.

If the true underreporting is double that (only 1% adverse reactions reported), then the real number of excess child deaths would be 103,500.

That 50 number is from 1992 and that 100 number is from 1993... Come on... Plus under-reporting deaths ?! I mean, yeah some will not go to the hospital whatever reasons they have but stating as logical that only 1 to 2% of people goes to the hospital when a child is in life-threatening condition is kinda bizarre...

#3 . Even if so, where is the direct coorelation proven between the very vaccination and the hospitalization/death ?

#4 . Reading the data :
From 1 to 4 doses, you do have 423 deaths and 11504 infants who lived, making a 3.6 ratio (423 / 11504 + 423)
From 5 to 8 doses, you do have 1458 deaths and 25416 infants who lived, making a 5.4 ratio (1458 / (25416 + 1458)
From 9 to 11 doses you have 4 deaths and 277 infants who lived, making a 1.4 ratio (4 / 277 + 4)

In that case, if you want to vaccinate your child, take the giga-cocktail with 11 vaccines because your child would have better chances to live !!

In a few words, if I were a pro-vaccine nut working for the pharmaceutical industry, I could have taken the same study and make the exact opposite article stating that :
"Mortality rate 157% lower if you give your child from 9 to 11 vaccines than 1 to 4 ! Better, mortality rate 286% lower than if you take from 5 to 8 ! If you want your child safer, vaccinate him ! A lot !"

Yeah people would have told me than there was a flaw in my statement (it should have been 9 to 12 instead of 9 to 11), but what's reason when you got big numbers to show off ?

ARTICLE DISMISSED


On a more serious note, I really wanna know why the authors dismissed those 9 to 11 vaccines as insufficient. They did follow the same modus operandi with lower doses, why didn't take the 9 to 11 numbers into account if the 1 to 8 numbers were significant ?

Of these, the cumulative 281 (0.7%) VAERS cases reporting 9 or more vaccine doses concurrently were insufficient to yield statistically significant results, especially when further stratified by age, and were therefore excluded from analysis.

 

[Brown_Pride]

@BrownPride ....about 88 trolling.

2 things.
1. The article. Believe it or not as a parent when we take our children to get shots i never allowed more than 3 at a time. That shyt was just common sense to me plus ffs how many needles can one kid take. More work for your system appeared in a logical way to increase adverse reactions. I never needed a study to tell me this it just made sense at the time.

After reading Liu Kang analysis though maybe I should have opted for all the shots at one time

my kids lived and don't have polio

2nd.

Come on man how long have you been here? A smilie is gonna set you off

 

[Crakface]

For those who wanna go further :

I use the javascript program they did (http://www.medicalveritas.com/vaers.php) to recreate the study data.
- Age : 0 < 1 (this is the "infant" age span)
- Doses count : All doses (1-15)
- Report events : Deaths (we are talking about mortality so...)
- Combine years : 1990 to 2009 (and combine 2010 to 2010
- Ignore cases with doses : 16 and higher

The flaws of the article IMO :
#1 . Millions of infants are vaccinated, make your ratio.

#2 . The article is super biased :

That 50 number is from 1992 and that 100 number is from 1993... Come on... Plus under-reporting deaths ?! I mean, yeah some will not go to the hospital whatever reasons they have but stating as logical that only 1 to 2% of people goes to the hospital when a child is in life-threatening condition is kinda bizarre...

#3 . Even if so, where is the direct coorelation proven between the very vaccination and the hospitalization/death ?

#4 . Reading the data :
From 1 to 4 doses, you do have 423 deaths and 11504 infants who lived, making a 3.6 ratio (423 / 11504 + 423)
From 5 to 8 doses, you do have 1458 deaths and 25416 infants who lived, making a 5.4 ratio (1458 / (25416 + 1458)
From 9 to 11 doses you have 4 deaths and 277 infants who lived, making a 1.4 ratio (4 / 277 + 4)

In that case, if you want to vaccine your child, take the giga-cocktail with 11 vaccines because your child would have better chances to live !!

In a few words, if I were a pro-vaccine nut working for the pharmaceutical industry, I could have take the same study and make the exact opposite article stating that :
"Mortality rate 157% lower if you give your child from 9 to 11 vaccines than 1 to 4 ! Better, mortality rate 286% lower than if you take from 5 to 8 ! If you want your child safer, vaccinate him ! A lot !"

Yeah people would have told me than there were a flaw in my statement (it should have been 9 to 12 instead of 9 to 11), but what's reason when you got big numbers to show off ?

ARTICLE DISMISSED


On a more serious note, I really wanna know why the authors dismissed those 9 to 11 vaccines as insufficient. They did follow the same modus operandi with lower doses, why didn't take the 9 to 11 numbers into account if the 1 to 8 numbers were significant ?

You probably still wont give your kid 5-8 doses though.

Just to be on the safe side

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Weak immune system. To think, you'll be passing those weak immune system genes onto another generation. Modern medicine perverts natural selection.

That's the bonus of being human. We're intelligent enough to have medicine. While God would've let me die, Doctors and modern medicine technology saved my life. So who should I worship? Science and Human intelligence

 

[Crakface]

That's the bonus of being human. We're intelligent enough to have medicine. While God would've let me die, Doctors and modern medicine technology saved my life.

You hate science and dont really believe in evolution. Just goes to show you, survival trumps natural selection. You're bred to be a slave to the system. Without it, you perish. You're existence and correct me if im wrong, is not natural.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

You hate science and dont really believe in evolution. Just goes to show you, survival trumps natural selection. You're bred to be a slave to the system. Without it, you perish. You're existence and correct me if im wrong, is not natural.

Alright Mowgli. You've gone too far off the deep end. I don't even know how to continue responding

 

[Crakface]

Alright Mowgli. You've gone too far off the deep end. I don't even know how to continue responding

Its like this. Some people are bred for life anywhere on the planet. Some people are bred for specific functions in a specific controlled environment.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Its like this. Some people are bred for life anywhere on the planet. Some people are bred for specific functions in a specific controlled environment.

You can't live everywhere on this planet

I hope for your seeds sake you aren't having a Bi-polar episode. You're jabberin and talkin like ol girl from homeland

 

[Crakface]

You can't live everywhere on this planet

I hope for your seeds sake you aren't having a Bi-polar episode. You're jabberin and talkin like ol girl from homeland

Im right though.

 

[thekingsmen]

2 things.

2nd.

Come on man how long have you been here? A smilie is gonna set you off

It's not about setting me off which it is not. It's the very fact that son is in all my threads minutes after I create them or the first one and not only that he doesn't bring anything to it but trolling. So if you aren't going to do anything that's cool.....next time I advise a better job for you than being a mod.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

I dont watch television and i recently had a psychotic break and unlocked a personality achievement so maybe you're right but at the same time.

Im right too.

If there was one thing your presence on these forums has demonstrated is that you lack fundamental understanding of evolution and natural selection. I don't even understand how we got on this topic other than you berating me for surviving pneumonia using medicine when your little kid gets sick you're not gonna be praying to god.

 

[thekingsmen]

The mother of the child's breast milk can keep the child protected( even more protected than vaccines) all the way to 15 months. CDC wants all children vaccinated at 6 months.