Mortality Rate 50% Higher with More Vaccine Doses

Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-150
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
Mortality Rate 50% Higher with Doubled Vaccine Doses - Gaia HealthGaia Health

Mortality Rate 50% Higher with More Vaccine Doses
January 13, 2013 by admin in Featured, Science, Vaccines with 27 Comments
PrintFriendly and PDFPrint

The deaths of children from multiple vaccine doses can only be called carnage. This study demonstrates that giving 5-8 doses instead of 1-4 doses at a time has resulted in an extra 51,750 to 103,500 child deaths in the last 20 years.
Shocked Boy, by Piers Nye

Shocked Boy, by Piers Nye

by Heidi Stevenson

A new study using data from the US government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) shows that the more vaccines given, the more likely children will die or be hospitalized. The increased rates are highly significant, with a 50% greater chance of death with doubling the number of vaccines and more than 100% increase in hospitalizations—that’s double the number of hospital visits!

VAERS is recognized to contain only a small percentage of all adverse vaccination events. As GS Goldman and NZ Miller point out,

[A] confidential study conducted by Connaught Laboratories, a vaccine manufacturer, indicated that ‘‘a fifty-fold under-reporting of adverse events’’ is likely. According to
David Kessler, former commissioner of the FDA, ‘‘only about one percent of serious events [adverse drug reactions] are reported.

Thus, the increased mortality and hospitalization suffered by children as a direct result of the aggressive vaccination schedule, with as many as 9 vaccines given in one day, is a huge number of children. If, according to the study’s report above, only 1 to 2 out of 100 adverse events is reported, then the numbers reported by VAERS need to be multiplied by 50 to 100!

Nonetheless, as this study has demonstrated, significant information about the hazards of vaccines can still be ascertained by running statistical analyses of the data given.

Graph of Hospitalization RatesThe graph on the right, produced by the study, displays the hospitalization rate charted against the number of vaccines. The solid diagonal line plots the linear regression calculated for the data. You can see that it’s a close match for the specific number of hospitalizations for each year.

The outlier references the hospitalizations for a single vaccine dose. This is likely explained by a combination of factors. One is that the earliest vaccines are generally given singly in the hospital shortly after birth. Newborns are at greater risk. Also, many parents will refuse to continue vaccinations, or will refuse multiple vaccines, after an early severe reaction.

R2 refers to the likelihood that the regression line is a good fit for the data. R2 of 0.91 is quite good. Perfect would be 1.00. Thus, it’s likely that the graph is showing the reality: When the number of vaccine doses increases, the number of hospitalizations increases dramatically, from 10% of VAERS reports with 2 doses to more than 20% with 8 doses.

Below is the table for the death rate by number of doses:

Table: Infant Mortality Rate, Number of Vaccine DosesInterestingly, the number of child deaths due to number of vaccine doses increases dramatically with 5. The reasons for this are unknown, but it may have to do with the particular vaccines given or simply be related to additive effects of toxins in the vaccines. That wasn’t analyzed in this report.

I’ve circled the salient data in red. They show the actual numbers of reported deaths, the numbers of reports of adverse events, and the rates of mortality for 1-4 vaccines added together and all adverse event reports of 5-8 vaccines added together.

Note: In reviewing the figures, I noted a possible small error. In my calculation, the circled 3.6% mortality rate should be recorded as 3.5%. It’s probably nothing more than a difference in method of rounding. I’ve written to the authors to ask about this and will report back on their response.

Update: Dr. Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D. responded quickly and frankly within a few hours:

Dear Heidi,

Yes, your calculation looks correct. The paper went through several revisions and what I think happened is that initially we showed the percentages accurate to the nearest hundredths, so 3.546… was shown rounded to 3.55, then at some point we decided to round only to the nearest tenths. Unfortunately, we likely rounded the 3.55 to 3.6 when we should have gone back to the original data. Sorry about that! Thank you for your find!

In looking at the table, it’s quite clear that something is going on with increasing doses of vaccines given at the same time. You can see that there’s a huge jump in mortality with the fourth vaccine, jumping by a factor of 3.88, from 42 to 163 deaths. The statistical method of reporting doesn’t clarify this fact, nor does it show that the increase is almost as great with the fifth vaccine dose, from 163 to 523, 3.21 times more children dying.

The second four vaccine doses, 5-8, are resulting in 50% more deaths than the first four doses, 1-4. When we also consider the likelihood that there are 50-100 times more adverse reactions than reported, what this study reveals is frightening:

1,458 deaths at 5-8 doses – 423 deaths at 1-4 doses = 1,035 extra deaths for doubling the number of doses.

Multiply that by 50 and you have 51,750 extra deaths simply for giving 5-8 vaccine doses, instead of 1-4 doses, at one time.

If the true underreporting is double that (only 1% adverse reactions reported), then the real number of excess child deaths would be 103,500.

That’s only considering the deaths caused by the fifth through eighth doses. It eliminates the deaths caused by the first four doses. Those would add up to 21,150 if VAERS includes 2% of actual adverse effects, and 42,300 if it includes 1%. Adding those numbers together gives us a total of 145,800 children who’ve died as a direct result of vaccines from 1990 to 2010.

This is carnage that can be laid directly at the doorstep of our aggressive vaccination program.

If you do want to have your children vaccinated, at least insist on only single doses separated by enough time to assure that there’s no cumulative effect. It’s clear from the evidence here that multiple vaccine doses, which have become standard, are responsible for a huge number of deaths in children.
 

CouldntBeMeTho

Chairman Meow
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
47,612
Reputation
20,473
Daps
270,826
Reppin
Dog Shooting Squad Of Islamabad
-42 states have mandatory vaccine policies, and many children are required 22 shots by first grade.

-According to government statistics, children under the age of 14 are three times more likely to suffer adverse effects -- including death -- following the hepatitis B vaccine than to catch the disease itself.

Fact Sheet on Mandatory Vaccination
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,222
Well obviously it's not a concern to many people who continue to vaccinate their children 20 times before they hit 3 years old.

Yea I wish my sons mother(s) wouldn't do this. I don't take sh1t. No medicine, vaccinations, nothing man made other than probably some poison or pesticides from fruit n sh1t.

I have to be one of the few people that went to Iraq without taking any shot, not even anthrax. I make excuses, reasons, medical reasons.. have been making up sh1t since I was very young.

And I'm not scared of shots. I just don't trust people, especially cac. A whole bunch of water and a hot bath cures a cold for me. I drank the water in Mexico, Iraq, and a couple places in Africa... after they said don't drink the water.
I feel like if you live life you will build up natural defenses. I was shot in the neck before, stabbed twice, totaled a car that caught on fire with me in it, and have been exposed to dangerous chemicals, smashed many a ratchet pusysy, worked in hospitals, etc. (I know this sounds crazy) but God gives you everything that you need to survive - in your body and growing from the Earth.
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,125
Reputation
2,604
Daps
67,686
Yea I wish my sons mother(s) wouldn't do this. I don't take sh1t. No medicine, vaccinations, nothing man made other than probably some poison or pesticides from fruit n sh1t.

I have to be one of the few people that went to Iraq without taking any shot, not even anthrax. I make excuses, reasons, medical reasons.. have been making up sh1t since I was very young.

And I'm not scared of shots. I just don't trust people, especially cac. A whole bunch of water and a hot bath cures a cold for me. I drank the water in Mexico, Iraq, and a couple places in Africa... after they said don't drink the water.
I feel like if you live life you will build up natural defenses. I was shot in the neck before, stabbed twice, totaled a car that caught on fire with me in it, and have been exposed to dangerous chemicals, smashed many a ratchet pusysy, worked in hospitals, etc. (I know this sounds crazy) but God gives you everything that you need to survive - in your body and growing from the Earth.
So now you're immune to gunshots, intestinal worms, fire, being stabbed, STD's, dangerous chemicals and staff infections?

You're right, it does sound crazy. Considering God is the one who created all of these diseases and viruses in the first place (using your stupid logic). If God gave you everything that you need to survive then why has modern medicine more than doubled the average lifespan of humans?

:russ:
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,222
So now you're immune to gunshots, intestinal worms, fire, being stabbed, STD's, dangerous chemicals and staff infections?

You're right, it does sound crazy. Considering God is the one who created all of these diseases and viruses in the first place (using your stupid logic). If God gave you everything that you need to survive then why has modern medicine more than doubled the average lifespan of humans?

:russ:

lol, I'm not immune to dangerous activities.. but I heal quickly is what I'm saying. I'm very healthy and the Universe has set this up for me. Even when I lived a completely opposite lifestyle, God protected me and unfortunately I took advantage. It's not like I'm going to only pray to Allah when I get dry skin.... I'm going to get some Eucerine.

There are natural cures that also increase lifespan. And I'm not against modern medicine, but I am worried about the push for vaccinations and most pills on the market.

I'm not in combat mode right now, but you really can't even speak to me talking about modern medicine has more than doubled the average lifespan of our species when really it was the way we preserve and cook our foods, our understanding of preventive measures like being more sanitary, more clean drinking water (and overall understanding of whats in water), and emphasis on prenatal care.

I guess we can say that some medicines have helped increase longevity over the years.. but disorders, disease, and illness is also on the rise. I chose to live naturally the best I can. I don't want to live past 80 anyway. And I do not want to get caught up in the rat trap of living longer while being prone to 800,000 different medical and mental issues. It's not like we are ACTUALLY Enjoying more years of health overall at the same rate as civilized populations are living longer. SO What The F is the point??

gottdamn the money makers are genius, but I want my years to be the best they can be.
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,125
Reputation
2,604
Daps
67,686
breh humans used to barely live to 20 years of age, why do you think women can get pregnant when they're like 12 or 13. Miss me with that "God is protecting me" nonesense. Once you get a real illness/disease or see someone suffering from it first hand you'll know he isn't. I would've died from pneumonia in highschool without modern medicine.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,222
Without God, living Naturally as possible and being weary of all that BS is the way to go ...... breh.


Women begin their menstrual bleeding anytime after 8 years old... usually before they are 17. You would have had a better (still wrong) argument speaking about how women can get pregnant later on in life due to modern medicine then relating that back to life expectancy. I would construct a valid argument for you, but I don't feel like it.

I just want to say that we have increase life expectancy for many different reasons. We also have added vaccinations, random treatments, food poisons, and dangerous pills to our modern lives. We now have more disorders, diseases, mental illness, and GO figure we have lower fertility rates as life expectancy increases.
 

Crakface

...
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
18,500
Reputation
1,530
Daps
25,708
Reppin
L.A
breh humans used to barely live to 20 years of age, why do you think women can get pregnant when they're like 12 or 13. Miss me with that "God is protecting me" nonesense. Once you get a real illness/disease or see someone suffering from it first hand you'll know he isn't. I would've died from pneumonia in highschool without modern medicine.

Weak immune system. To think, you'll be passing those weak immune system genes onto another generation. :scusthov: Modern medicine perverts natural selection.
 
Top