There's no problem. Like you said, there were tweets about tweets, so clearly something was there. You and I just have different proof requirements. You need to see video and still photos of the flames to know there was a fire; seeing the burnt embers or hearing witness accounts is sufficient for me. I can fill in the blanks to deduce what happened.It’s not about extending grace. Tweets about tweets aren’t receipts. The actual receipt was posted and I dapped it. It was requested information relevant to this thread. What’s the problem?