Missouri gun murders 'rose after law repeal'

Black smoke and cac jokes

Your daps are mine
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
2,703
Reputation
695
Daps
7,170
Missouri gun murders 'rose after law repeal'

Researchers claim a new study provides some of the most compelling evidence yet for tighter gun controls in the US.

The team followed the consequences of the State of Missouri repealing its permit-to-purchase handgun law in 2007.

The law had required purchasers to be vetted by the local sheriff and to receive a licence before buying a gun.

Reporting soon in the Journal of Urban Health, the researchers will say that the repeal resulted in an immediate spike in gun violence and murders.

The study links the abandonment of the background check to an additional 60 or so murders occurring per year in Missouri between 2008 and 2012.

"Coincident exactly with the policy change, there was an immediate upward trajectory to the homicide rates in Missouri," said Prof Daniel Webster, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research.

"That upward trajectory did not happen with homicides that did not involve guns; it did not occur to any neighbouring state; the national trend was doing the opposite – it was trending downward; and it was not specific to one or two localities – it was, for the most part, state-wide," he told BBC News.

The team said it took account of changes that occurred in policing levels and incarceration rates, trends in burglaries, and statistically controlled for other possible confounding factors such as shifts in unemployment and poverty.


What was stark, added Prof Webster, was the rise in the number of handguns that subsequently found their way into the hands of criminals.

The team counted a doubling of handguns shortly after sale being recovered from scenes of crimes or from criminals.

"This study is compelling confirmation that weaknesses in firearm laws lead to deaths from gun violence," said Prof Webster.

The Johns Hopkins researcher was participating in a discussion here at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

The theme was "science-based strategies for reducing gun violence".

America currently has more than 300 million firearms in circulation. But the issue of gun control remains a hugely contentious one.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-26222578
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
102,486
Reputation
13,694
Daps
299,385
Reppin
NULL
these fukkin rednecks :beli:

im all for people legally owning guns, but it should be hard to do
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,974
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,065
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
I'm confused as to how "homicides by gun" numbers can be distorted
They aren't distorted, they just aren't comparative. If I took a measure of all homicides by knives, and just read that to you, how could knives possibly be said to have gotten an objective consideration or 'fair shot' if you will. Could a good case for knives be made based solely on this information?

If I only present what a man has done wrong or a number of his wrongs, and that alone, have I presented you an accurate picture of this person? a fair picture?

Its slander really...
 

boskey

Top Rankin
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,170
Reputation
3,621
Daps
62,430
If I only present what a man has done wrong or a number of his wrongs, and that alone, have I presented you an accurate picture of this person? a fair picture?

Its slander really...

If the list of wrongs includes "intentionally murdered several innocent people" thats usually all you need to hear to paint a picture of a person. Even if you add "protected his home" or "theoretically warded off tyranny" to the list of deeds...
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,974
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,065
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
If the list of wrongs includes "intentionally murdered several innocent people" thats usually all you need to hear to paint a picture of a person. Even if you add "protected his home" or "theoretically warded off tyranny" to the list of deeds...
:ehh:

Pretty much what I expected.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,338
Reputation
6,850
Daps
90,886
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
They aren't distorted, they just aren't comparative. If I took a measure of all homicides by knives, and just read that to you, how could knives possibly be said to have gotten an objective consideration or 'fair shot' if you will. Could a good case for knives be made based solely on this information?

If I only present what a man has done wrong or a number of his wrongs, and that alone, have I presented you an accurate picture of this person? a fair picture?

Its slander really...

:heh: this is a pretty laughable argument sir

You do realize that gun statistics are/can be broken out by the type of event. The "good" gun stats pale in comparison to the bad. That is why they are never used by your advocates.
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,974
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,065
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
:heh: this is a pretty laughable argument sir

You do realize that gun statistics are/can be broken out by the type of event. The "good" gun stats pale in comparison to the bad. That is why they are never used by your advocates.
Its because you cant accurately track how many lives are saved by guns :manny: I'll look over some "good" gun stats though and get back to you.

 
Top