Mike Tyson vs Deontay Wilder: Who Wins?

R=G

R=G

Street Terrorist
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
123,273
Reputation
8,503
Daps
145,798
Reppin
Westcoast
BBjsFLW.gif
 
merklman

merklman

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,965
Reputation
65
Daps
3,403
Reppin
N17
David_TheMan said:
Actually I did clearly state that, because the post was talking specifically about "prime" Tyson as defined by the other poster.
Your ability to not read and follow a convo isn't my failure, its your own.

I never said Evander or Lennox were the same level as Eric Molina.

Again its funny how you all claim I don't know shyt about boxing, but you have to deliberately lie about what I post because you can't really logically refute anything I've written. Mainly because you don't know much about boxing.
Click to expand...

fukk out of here clown :mjlol: How am i lying when ive posted your words over and over? You said they fought the same level of competition. . . You haven't been able to say who exactly Tyson ducked during his early run after me asking several times . . . Even if you remove Lennox, Holyfield, Spinks, Holmes - the rest of Tysons resume shyts over the bums Wilder fought - thats facts. :mjlol:. If the original poster was talking about "Prime Tyson" 85-89, why you clinging onto two occassions? Lennox beating down 2002 tyson as a demonstration of what Wilder would do to him? I know, and so do you evidently - 2002 Tyson is probably the only version that wilder could beat :mjlol:. Buster douglas knocking out coked out tyson who barely trained :russ: So you're supreme confidence in wilder literally boils down some wish upon a star shyt with Tyson having one of his worst nights ever and Wilder having the fight of his life:mjlol:. We seen what an old fat dude did to wilder on saturday, how do you think Prime Tyson footwork, head movement and explosiveness would've fared?
 
David_TheMan

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,018
Reputation
-3,374
Daps
83,300
merklman said:
fukk out of here clown :mjlol: How am i lying when ive posted your words over and over? You said they fought the same level of competition. . . You haven't been able to say who exactly Tyson ducked during his early run after me asking several times . . . Even if you remove Lennox, Holyfield, Spinks, Holmes - the rest of Tysons resume shyts over the bums Wilder fought - thats facts. :mjlol:. If the original poster was talking about "Prime Tyson" 85-89, why you clinging onto two occassions? Lennox beating down 2002 tyson as a demonstration of what Wilder would do to him? I know, and so do you evidently - 2002 Tyson is probably the only version that wilder could beat :mjlol:. Buster douglas knocking out coked out tyson who barely trained :russ: So you're supreme confidence in wilder literally boils down some wish upon a star shyt with Tyson having one of his worst nights ever and Wilder having the fight of his life:mjlol:. We seen what an old fat dude did to wilder on saturday, how do you think Prime Tyson footwork, head movement and explosiveness would've fared?
Click to expand...

I never said Tyson ducked anyone. Again you literally pulling shyt out your ass now.
 
merklman

merklman

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,965
Reputation
65
Daps
3,403
Reppin
N17
David_TheMan said:
I never said Tyson ducked anyone. Again you literally pulling shyt out your ass now.
Click to expand...

You said he fought no one of note - I just wanted to know who was there that he was supposed to fight instead . . which you on several occasions could not answer :mjlol:. Go look at what you've written - i quoted you multiple times - and see what YOU wrote moron :francis: Dont be acting like we forgot the more recent Tyson calling out Wilders bum ass saying he was waiting on Bumsquad to send a contract - now that wouldve been "someone of note" on his resume, but still after 40 fight, and he's fought no one - and you think that ok :picard:.
 
David_TheMan

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,018
Reputation
-3,374
Daps
83,300
merklman said:
You said he fought no one of note - I just wanted to know who was there that he was supposed to fight instead . . which you on several occasions could not answer :mjlol:. Go look at what you've written - i quoted you multiple times - and see what YOU wrote moron :francis: Dont be acting like we forgot the more recent Tyson calling out Wilders bum ass saying he was waiting on Bumsquad to send a contract - now that wouldve been "someone of note" on his resume, but still after 40 fight, and he's fought no one - and you think that ok :picard:.
Click to expand...
His resume in his "prime" is terrible. That is what I said.l
How you claim that is "ducking" makes no sense, since it doesn't mean the same thing.
 
malbaker86

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,963
Reputation
7,094
Daps
124,804
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
merklman said:
You said he fought no one of note - I just wanted to know who was there that he was supposed to fight instead . . which you on several occasions could not answer :mjlol:. Go look at what you've written - i quoted you multiple times - and see what YOU wrote moron :francis: Dont be acting like we forgot the more recent Tyson calling out Wilders bum ass saying he was waiting on Bumsquad to send a contract - now that wouldve been "someone of note" on his resume, but still after 40 fight, and he's fought no one - and you think that ok :picard:.
Click to expand...

Who Tyson beat in his career that Wilder would have had no shot at beating??
 
merklman

merklman

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
2,965
Reputation
65
Daps
3,403
Reppin
N17
David_TheMan said:
His resume in his "prime" is terrible. That is what I said.l
How you claim that is "ducking" makes no sense, since it doesn't mean the same thing.
Click to expand...
You said he fought no one of note . . . by this standard, how would you describe Wilders' 39 opponents? People in glass houses really shouldnt be throwing stones :mjlol:

Yes you said Tyson fought trash in his prime years - I asked you over and over, who should Tyson have fought instead? You still cant answer that :mjcry: Why hasnt wilder fought anyone of note in his 40 fights :mjcry:
 
David_TheMan

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,018
Reputation
-3,374
Daps
83,300
merklman said:
You said he fought no one of note . . . by this standard, how would you describe Wilders' 39 opponents? People in glass houses really shouldnt be throwing stones :mjlol:

Yes you said Tyson fought trash in his prime years - I asked you over and over, who should Tyson have fought instead? You still cant answer that :mjcry: Why hasnt wilder fought anyone of note in his 40 fights :mjcry:
Click to expand...


"prime" tyson was said to have his best to names be Spinks and Holmes, so yes prime Tyson fought no one of note.
I've already said Stiverne, Arreola, and Ortiz were better fighters than the Spinks and Holmes that Tyson fought.
What don't you understand?

You ask me who he should have fought, and the answer is doesn't matter, because I'm not talking about who he could have fought. I'm talking about what he actually did.
 
The Fukin Prophecy

The Fukin Prophecy

RIP Champ
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,410
Reputation
5,705
Daps
95,928
David_TheMan said:
"prime" tyson was said to have his best to names be Spinks and Holmes, so yes prime Tyson fought no one of note.
I've already said Stiverne, Arreola, and Ortiz were better fighters than the Spinks and Holmes that Tyson fought.
What don't you understand?

You ask me who he should have fought, and the answer is doesn't matter, because I'm not talking about who he could have fought. I'm talking about what he actually did.
Click to expand...
:what:

31 year old Mike Spinks was leagues better than the three fat asses you named...

That's not even remotely debatable...

Just because Tyson dominated him in embarrassing fashion doesn't mean the man was trash...
 
David_TheMan

David_TheMan

Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
37,018
Reputation
-3,374
Daps
83,300
The Fukin Prophecy said:
:what:

31 year old Mike Spinks was leagues better than the three fat asses you named...

That's not even remotely debatable...

Just because Tyson dominated him in embarrassing fashion doesn't mean the man was trash...
Click to expand...
The Spinks that Tyson fought had 2 bad knees, only had fougth once in 2 years, and didn't want to fight Tyson but did it for the big check. He was stripped of his title because his refusal to fight and wait for a big money fight. Rock Newman has admitted this.

Holmes was retired for 2 years, had not fought, stated he had no intention of fighting and didn't get in shape for the fight mainly because he just wanted the easy 3 mil.

These are facts.

His best two wins were a semi retired Lt Hwy with 2 bad knees and a retired HW they paid to come out of retirement.

Arreola, Stiverne, and Ortiz that Wilder fought, was better opposition and it isn't even debatable.
 
M

Master Teacher

Banned
Hall of Shame
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
K Bishop said:
So nikkas really acting like Michael Spinks, Larry Holmes, Tony Tucker and Pinklon Thomas are not better wins than Stiverne, Arreola and Ortiz. Tony Tucker would prolly be the best win on Wilder's resume :patrice:
Click to expand...

lmao Michael Spinks was a light heavyweight, Larry Holmes was on a losing streak out of his prime he was washed up, thats like giving larry holmes credit for beating Ali are you serious

Tucker and Thomas are not better than Ortiz, and are no different than Arreola and Stiverne

Tyson ducked Riddikk Bowe
Tyson Ducked a 40 year old George Foreman

Buster Douglas beat Tyson

that's like wilder losing to Arreola or Stirverne, you would call him trash right

take off the nostalgia classes

Tyson is way to small for wilder he would get brutally KO'd
Douglas was 6'3 and too big for him, Wilder is 6'7 and moves like a middleweight, are you fukking kidding me

Tyson can't even go 5 rounds without gassing, Wilder can go 12 and still have the same power he had in the 1st round

fukk outta here
 
Shorty K

Shorty K

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
3,480
Reputation
225
Daps
12,365
Master Teacher said:
lmao Michael Spinks was a light heavyweight, Larry Holmes was on a losing streak out of his prime he was washed up, thats like giving larry holmes credit for beating Ali are you serious

Tucker and Thomas are not better than Ortiz, and are no different than Arreola and Stiverne

Tyson ducked Riddikk Bowe
Tyson Ducked a 40 year old George Foreman

Buster Douglas beat Tyson

that's like wilder losing to Arreola or Stirverne, you would call him trash right

take off the nostalgia classes

Tyson is way to small for wilder he would get brutally KO'd
Douglas was 6'3 and too big for him, Wilder is 6'7 and moves like a middleweight, are you fukking kidding me

Tyson can't even go 5 rounds without gassing, Wilder can go 12 and still have the same power he had in the 1st round

fukk outta here
Click to expand...

Tony Tucker got a better resume than Ortiz and was a better fighter than Stiverne and Arreola foh bro.

Tony Tubbs and Trevor Berbick are fukking top 3 Wilder wins while we're at it foh. Tyson's resume is wayyy better than Wilders. And you talking crazy disrespectful to Buster Douglas putting him on the same level as Stiverne. Foh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top