Bad match for Floyd a height a slight reach disadvantage the latter something Floyd doesnt usually give up, not to mention Mccallum great jab to utilized that height and reach,MM was a natural light mw, and not a fat lww that lingers lmw these days. Toss up...Who takes this.
it's quite foolish for anyone to think that a simply ok fighter like Mccallum in his day walks over a top 10 ATG like Mayweather
Name 10 fighters better than Floyd
Yea, except that Duran wasn't fighting at 135-140 in the 80's. By that time he had moved up to WW & MWBad match for Floyd a height a slight reach disadvantage the latter something Floyd doesnt usually give up, not to mention Mccallum great jab to utilized that height and reach,MM was a natural light mw, and not a fat lww that lingers lmw these days. Toss up...
Mccallum had skills but if Toney defense gave him issues Mayweather defense gives him hellfire. Fight is a toss up cause of size strictly, it's quite foolish for anyone to think that a simply ok fighter like Mccallum in his day walks over a top 10 ATG like Mayweather
In theoretical matches I try to keep Floyd away from the JMW battles, those were actually big boys in those days. Had Mayweather been around in the 80's he most likely would campaign at 135-140 ending/halting bum nikkas like Durans career
Name 10 fighters better than Floyd
I know Im just saying had Floyd been around I just forsee him at a lower weight probablya division or 2 less, even the WW's were massiveYea, except that Duran wasn't fighting at 135-140 in the 80's. By that time he had moved up to WW & MW
What does this have to do with naming 10 fighters you would pick over FloydI only know floyd and his last 10 opponents.
Let me check boxrec quickly.
What does this have to do with naming 10 fighters you would pick over Floyd
sickening right?Body Snatcher being "Simply Okay"