Reid2Achieve
Superstar
A civil case. Not a criminal case. What he “won” was keeping his money.
WHAT YOU DO KNOW IS HE WON HIS CASE.
A civil case. Not a criminal case. What he “won” was keeping his money.
WHAT YOU DO KNOW IS HE WON HIS CASE.
A civil case. Not a criminal case. What he “won” was keeping his money.
A civil case. Not a criminal case. What he “won” was keeping his money.
She hasn’t filed criminal charges and there isn’t enough evidence for prosecutors to file it themselves at the moment. Detectives could still be investigating it. Civil cases don’t decide what’s right from wrong in accordance with the law, so I’m trying to help you guys see the difference.
SO WHY WERENT CRIMINAL CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST HIM GENIUS?
HER OWN ROOMATE
CALLED IT A SHAM
TO EXTORT MONEY FROM ROSE.
Don't let this bytch-made nikka Bomani Jones off the hook either:
Dude would prob kill a nikka just to get a lick of her p*ssy.
On October 19 of that year, he was cleared by an eight-member jury and absolved of wrongdoing
so he’s brought to court and given no jail time, but the court of rachel will ignore weinstein gettin off to hop into other ppl’s culture with nothing but a finger to point
She hasn’t filed criminal charges and there isn’t enough evidence for prosecutors to file it themselves at the moment. Detectives could still be investigating it. Civil cases don’t decide what’s right from wrong in accordance with the law, so I’m trying to help you guys see the difference.
I admit the plaintiff sounds like a thottie. I’m not even condemning him, personally. He could be “innocent”.
But I understand why people are giving him the side eye - because of his deposition under oath. The language he used sounds like it came from a habitual rapist.
yeah we got a rachel cac supporter right here y'all....nikkas just couldn't help himself. They always reveal themselves overtime, just give them time to speak and it happens everytime.
Dude would prob kill a nikka just to get a lick of her p*ssy. SMH. Mans would prob vote trump if she told him to. Weird ass dudes on this site mane.
Running trains around these parts are normal(Southside), how many times going to tell yall this
The man went under oath and described how normal he thinks it is to gang bang women (“we men, you can assume...”) and other weird/unusual things like not knowing what the word consent means.
So with that said, y’all shouldn’t be surprised that feminists are up in arms about it. I’ve seen black women online talk about how disgusted they are with the love Rose is getting as well. This ain’t black excellence or none of that shyt that I’m willing to stick my neck out for.
Sidenote: Rose’s case was a civil trial, so there is no deciding if he was guilty or not, only liability; meaning compensation for damages. He was found “not liable”, and the lady is appealing that so it’s not even over. There was apparently not enough evidence to do a criminal case. We don’t actually know if he was “guilty” or not.
They can't attack anyone white so they just go after Black men. The oldest trick in the book. MeToo is trashPeople have b*stardized #metoo. I’m all for the movement connected to parties guilty of intimidation, coercion, and harassment, but using the tag just to try to drag any and everyone under the bus, especially when cleared in multiple proceedings, undermines the whole point of the movement and real victims.