Dating isn't a real thing. The issue with your argument is everything gets tossed together under the guise of 'dating'. Folks having ONS, FWB, people courting to get married all get tossed in together.
This is whats wrong with things culturally. Who gives a damn people are smashing bums, yet you are using that data point to push your contrarian agenda.
Never change.
I agree. The dating scene for the end goal of dating is such a pointless thing to worry about, yet it is the crux of 99% of man vs woman content.
Talk to 10 different women and you might get 9 different definitions of what a "boyfriend" is.
At the end of the day, are these women getting married or no?
In the article:
'Of course, university sex ratios wouldn't matter so much if we were all more open-minded about whom we date and eventually marry (which I think we should be).
But you aint.. so what the fukk we talking about?
A woman can have 5 boyfriends, over some period of time. But if she only thinks 1 one was cute and was worth calling her "boyfriend", does her data also count? She only had one boyfriend? I know women who dated dudes that they will never include as part of their dating history.
Every man who has been to college knows that what I just posted is how most college women describe their college dating life. Its basically filtering out the ones that "didn't count" due to their own biases or notion.
Has nothing to do with "Golden Penis Syndrome" or whatever this article is about.