Meg Thee Stalion - “Tory shot me and I still tried to protect him because the police be killing us”

Born2BKing

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,654
Reputation
13,899
Daps
324,607
I don’t need evidence a dope boy is the one who was sending her to school. You think he ain’t never have her go flirt a bit with a plug?


She’s clearly been around a lot of the criminal element and has called herself a savage bad bytch we aren’t talking about no square as chick right here. She’s far from innocent.


Like have y’all not paid attention to the people she’s surrounded herself with? Even her homegirls some known go getters.

and she even kicked this thing off herself basically saying she don’t talk to no police (oh why because she’s a street chick)...if she wants to tell or whatever that’s cool but she would be snitching. Ain’t like she’d be the first person to snitch.
If she snitched, Tory would be in jail right now for Aggravated Assault.
 

Born2BKing

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,654
Reputation
13,899
Daps
324,607
I still believe Megan's homegirl that was in the car shot her and Tory is getting all the heat from it. Ironically Megan hasnt said or posted anything about her since the incident.

If you asked me, I think her homegirl was fukking with Tory like Akadmiks said, but she pulled the burner out and accidently shot Meg, but since it was Tory's gun he's taking the rap for it. Reason why I say that is because of the way the car looked in the helicopter video...

Tory was in the backseat, hopped out the left side. Her homegirl was in the backseat too.
Now how Tory get out the backseat and lay on the ground first but managed to ironically shoot Meg outside of the car beforehand if she was in the passenger seat...?
Got damn, ya'll really hate women. :russ: Making up the dumbest shyt to shyt on them. :dead:
 

AAKing23

92' til Infinity....
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,975
Reputation
6,512
Daps
150,100
Reppin
NJ-PA
Why would you focus on a WOMAN'S dating choice instead of shaming the MEN who perpetrate toxicity? Let women talk to women about their dating choices because that's a woman's business. Let the men talk to men.

It's up to the MEN to have a handle on their own culture and brethren so their aren't so many goddamned abusers in the community in the first damn place. That is how real men handle shyt. Y'all acting like theres merely 100,000 aint shyt nikkas in the U.S. and like it's not at least 1/4 of you.

So many of y'all find it easier to talk down on women than stand up to men. That's pathetic in and of itself.
Shame a grown man brehs :laff:


That's gonna show him
 

ipawd1

Rookie
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Messages
47
Reputation
10
Daps
98
Got damn, ya'll really hate women. :russ: Making up the dumbest shyt to shyt on them. :dead:

You really have to stop using the narrative of "every man-hating women" for questioning the facts. Take the gender out of it, its more than worth questioning. But since you feel the need to bring gender into it, lets. But first: This is not a defense of Tory... if after everything plays out, and it's determined he shot her (by all parties involved, the cops, etc, fukk that guy.

With that out the way:

Without questioning a woman, but using her words, a lot of things she has said seem to be conflicting. I know people mention the fact that Tory hasnt said anything, which is ironic because the less he's said, the more Meg has.. almost as if she's trying to get ahead of things.

All the things I mentioned before about her friend being quiet, her friend liking a comment about being silenced on Instagram, and the fact Meg was sitting in the front seat while her "best friend" and the dude she was dating were in the back we can just push that to the side.

Still believing Meg up to this point (and even after).

Alerts of her now doing a "Live Concert" stream on Spotify a day after her IG live scream "promote as much as possible while the attention is on you"... And that's not victim-blaming that's black and white facts.

Again this isnt "men hating women" but asking the right questions with the facts given by a woman". If Meg says a week from now "I know I said Tory shot me but I was in the front seat and didnt see who shot me", the same people saying he did it and should be canceled will find a way for HIM to be at fault even though there is no proof. More importantly, for me (only speaking for me)...

I can't continue to believe (victim or not) a story that continuously changes when they are adamant they know who did it. Things like this make it hard for the ACTUAL victims of domestic violence to be believed, which leads to both men and women to question the circumstance.

Aside from that, it can't be "there are two sides to the story" but conveniently when the ONE party hasn't spoken up (with or without legal counsel) we default to beliving the party who has spoken because they are the only ones saying something.

That's a lot to read that you probably wont, but I figured I would attempt to have a dialogue with you.
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,831
Reputation
6,592
Daps
108,585
Reppin
Bay Area
LAPD came out and said she didn't snitch though. :dahell:

bro

for the 100th time

IN CALIFORNIA

MEGS TESTIMONY OR WORDS MEAN NOTHING

IF AN EX FELON SHOT A GUN AT SOMEONE, IN CALIFORNIA, THE DA (DISTRICT ATTORNEY) , IN CALIFORNIA, AND I CANT STRESS THIS ENOUGH

IN CALIFORNIA CAN CHARGE SOMEONE EVEN WITHOUT A WITNESS TESTIMONY IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE THEMSELVES (GUN POWDER RESIDUE FROM A GSR TEST WHICH WOULD BE MANDATORY TAKEN IF THE COPS THOUGHT A GUN WAS DISCHARGED THE NIGHT OF OR INJURIES WERE SUSTAINED FROM IT)

MEG LYING TO THE COPS MEANS 100% NOTHING

IF TORY DISCHARGED A GUN, HE WOULD BE IN JAIL, WITHOUT BOND(or at least a crazy high bond), RIGHT NOW

THATS HOW CALIFORNIA WORKS.

THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS LAPD / THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONT BELIEVE A GUN WAS DISCHARGED THE NIGHT OF, OR AT LEAST FROM TORY LANEZ AND ALSO THAT MEG INJURIES ARE MORE THAN LIKELY FROM SHATTERED GLASS

THIS IS JUSSIE SMOLLET PT 2


and even then, The incident just happened a month ago, Meg has a public testimony NAMING Tory Lanez and hes STILL not arrested. Her "lying" on the original report means nothing since its STILL AN ON GOING INVESTIGATION AND SHE NAMED HIM AS THE SHOOTER. Cases are not built on the original report at the scene :mjlol:

BUT HES STILL NOT LOCKED UP

BECAUSE

SHE
DID
NOT
GET
SHOT
 
Last edited:

Born2BKing

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,654
Reputation
13,899
Daps
324,607
bro

for the 100th time

IN CALIFORNIA

MEGS TESTIMONY OR WORDS MEAN NOTHING

IF AN EX FELON SHOT A GUN AT SOMEONE, IN CALIFORNIA, THE DA (DISTRICT ATTORNEY) , IN CALIFORNIA, AND I CANT STRESS THIS ENOUGH

IN CALIFORNIA CAN CHARGE SOMEONE EVEN WITHOUT A WITNESS TESTIMONY IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE THEMSELVES (GUN POWDER RESIDUE FROM A GSR TEST WHICH WOULD BE MANDATORY TAKEN IF THE COPS THOUGHT A GUN WAS DISCHARGED THE NIGHT OF OR INJURIES WERE SUSTAINED FROM IT)

MEG LYING TO THE COPS MEANS 100% NOTHING

IF TORY DISCHARGED A GUN, HE WOULD BE IN JAIL, WITHOUT BOND(or at least a crazy high bond), RIGHT NOW

THATS HOW CALIFORNIA WORKS.

THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS LAPD / THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONT BELIEVE A GUN WAS DISCHARGED THE NIGHT OF, OR AT LEAST FROM TORY LANEZ AND ALSO THAT MEG INJURIES ARE MORE THAN LIKELY FROM SHATTERED GLASS

THIS IS JUSSIE SMOLLET PT 2


and even then, The incident just happened a month ago, Meg has a public testimony NAMING Tory Lanez and hes STILL not arrested. Her "lying" on the original report means nothing since its STILL AN ON GOING INVESTIGATION AND SHE NAMED HIM AS THE SHOOTER. Cases are not built on the original report at the scene :mjlol:

BUT HES STILL NOT LOCKED UP

BECAUSE

SHE
DID
NOT
GET
SHOT
Why are you so passionate about the fact she didn't get shot? When someone is facing a charge them or thier lawyer will come out and say their client is not guilty.
 

itsyoung!!

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,831
Reputation
6,592
Daps
108,585
Reppin
Bay Area
Why are you so passionate about the fact she didn't get shot? When someone is facing a charge them or thier lawyer will come out and say their client is not guilty.

:laff: thats not true at all

if anything his lawyers might be clipping all the multiple story changes (you do acknowledge that her story has changed multiple times now right, at the very least you will at least acknowledge this?) and preparing a suite against her for all we know

its only been a few weeks.. cot damn I miss the 90s man when people were more rational on time tables instead of this social media need to respond ASAP shyt


the truth is, NEITHER of us know what happened in that SUV

the things we DO know 100% fact from actual law enforcement:

-No one was shot the night of, as no one was arrested for a shooting.
-Meg Thee Stallion injuries are consistent to glass injuries, per LAPD
-Tory Lanez was not arrested for firing a gun, which they definitely tested him for after detainment.
-Tory Lanez was free to fly any where in the country (currently in Miami), which wouldn't of been allowed if the district attorney had a shred of evidence (gun residue on him or from the gun itself being recently fired) that he may of shot someone. Even if he used the gun earlier in the day some where else residue would still be on in some kind of way rather from the gun or on him and would be enough to lock him away til the investigation ended
-Tory Lanez is still a free man, although the "victim" (meg thee stallion) named him as the shooter, while the case is still open. The District Attorney obviously finds this to be bull shyt or tory lanez would be in hand cuffs. Its not like hes hiding any where or they thought he was a flight risk.
-We also know that originally Meg said she got shot, multiple bullets, in both feet and now retracted to say 1 bullet in 1 foot.


this is what we know. 100%. The only person that is saying a gun went off, is Meg herself. Have you seen the pictures? Does that look like a bullet wound? If anything looks like a BB Gun wound but more than likely glass.

Do you know anyone that was personally shot? It takes months to heal..some people years or not at all.. Can you name 1 other person in history that was shot and recovered in 2 weeks?

these are rational questions to be asked

Based off your own personal history and people you might know, do you know anyone who was actually shot with a bullet and recovered in 2 weeks?
 
Last edited:
Top