bro
for the 100th time
IN CALIFORNIA
MEGS TESTIMONY OR WORDS MEAN NOTHING
IF AN EX FELON SHOT A GUN AT SOMEONE, IN CALIFORNIA, THE DA (DISTRICT ATTORNEY) , IN CALIFORNIA, AND I CANT STRESS THIS ENOUGH
IN CALIFORNIA CAN CHARGE SOMEONE EVEN WITHOUT A WITNESS TESTIMONY IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE THEMSELVES (GUN POWDER RESIDUE FROM A GSR TEST WHICH WOULD BE MANDATORY TAKEN IF THE COPS THOUGHT A GUN WAS DISCHARGED THE NIGHT OF OR INJURIES WERE SUSTAINED FROM IT)
MEG LYING TO THE COPS MEANS 100% NOTHING
IF TORY DISCHARGED A GUN, HE WOULD BE IN JAIL, WITHOUT BOND(or at least a crazy high bond), RIGHT NOW
THATS HOW CALIFORNIA WORKS.
THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS LAPD / THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DONT BELIEVE A GUN WAS DISCHARGED THE NIGHT OF, OR AT LEAST FROM TORY LANEZ AND ALSO THAT MEG INJURIES ARE MORE THAN LIKELY FROM SHATTERED GLASS
THIS IS JUSSIE SMOLLET PT 2
and even then, The incident just happened a month ago, Meg has a public testimony NAMING Tory Lanez and hes STILL not arrested.
Her "lying" on the original report means nothing since its STILL AN ON GOING INVESTIGATION AND SHE NAMED HIM AS THE SHOOTER. Cases are not built on the original report at the scene
BUT HES STILL NOT LOCKED UP
BECAUSE
SHE
DID
NOT
GET
SHOT