uh .. NO, every fight after 2007 did not have random blood testing... so calling somebody (aka me) "a random dude that doesnt follow boxing" yet SONNING HIMSELF WITH THAT STATEMENT IS A LITTLE OFF....
SO IM JUS GONNA CHALK IT UP TO YOU MAKING A MISTAKE AND INSTEAD OF SAYING 2010 YOU BY ACCIDENT TYPED UP 2007 HONEST MISTAKE
NOW IF YOU WANNA STAND BY 2007 THEN ILL JUS pre-empt here MY RESPONSE TO THAT POST THAT YOUR A MORON
no way floyd was wasting DAT MONEY ON blood work on hatton , marquez or dlh in 2007
http://www.mlive.com/mayweather/index.ssf/2010/01/leonard_ellerbe_floyd_mayweath.html
Mayweather-Mosley, however, could end up being an influential fight in its own right and ironically enough, it's because of enhanced drug testing. For the first time, two boxers have agreed to subject themselves to blood tests that can detect HGH, the performance-enhancing substance that remains undetectable in the basic urine testing used by state boxing commissions, as well as the major U.S. professional sports leagues. It's fair to wonder if Mayweather is posturing by suddenly demanding blood tests once he's about to fight Pacquiao, the Filipino phenom who threatens his unblemished record. And Mosley, who admitted to unknowingly taking steroids back in 2003, is trying to clear his name. But the bottom line is that this fight has set a precedent for fair play in a sport, and sports world, that badly needs it.
Read more:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1986369,00.html#ixzz2SVZnzu6h