Massive Black Sarcophagus Unearthed in Egypt

King Jae

Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
5,312
Reputation
865
Daps
16,193
That's accurate for the period. Ptolemy Soter was the pharoah of Egypt around the dates cited.
Dunno bruh...just looks out of place...like someone planted it there and took a pic on some slick shyt...pardon my ignorance but in all the Egyptian artifacts I seen...never seen a bust that looks like that...normally more colorful and detailed...just ain't sitting right...I know bout the invasions and influence from other cultures..but still...
 

Sukairain

Shahenshah
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
4,770
Reputation
2,273
Daps
17,382
Reppin
Straiya
Dunno bruh...just looks out of place...like someone planted it there and took a pic on some slick shyt...pardon my ignorance but in all the Egyptian artifacts I seen...never seen a bust that looks like that...normally more colorful and detailed...just ain't sitting right...I know bout the invasions and influence from other cultures..but still...

I'm not expert on artefacts and material history either, I'm into traditional history based on literary sources and coins and things like that.

But if the thing appears European-style sculpture then the reason would be it's probably depicting a Macedonian and it was probably created by a Greek craftsman
 

Sukairain

Shahenshah
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
4,770
Reputation
2,273
Daps
17,382
Reppin
Straiya
Well there not enough black anthologist and professionals to counter act their claims.

Be the change you wanna see. :manny:

This is so true, the lack of minority interest in humanities and especially pursuing academic humanities as a career is largely why the world is so ignorant about the truth.

I'm trying to be a historian and at just the first level after bachelor's, the minority students just melt away. Aside from a few east Asians I'm the only non-white person in the group
 

Sukairain

Shahenshah
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
4,770
Reputation
2,273
Daps
17,382
Reppin
Straiya
Watch out for any ancient Egypt articles/books etc that are heavily focused with the most northern part of the land. And double watch out when they focus on anything after 600BC.

These cacs will ignore thousands of miles of architecture... and skip over 4,000+ years of history just to focus on "Alexandria" & ptolemy's invader era
:francis:
Very slick

It is a little more accessible and easier to focus on Achaemenid and Ptolemaic Egypt because you don't have to go to the trouble of learning hieroglyphics. Ancient Greek and cuneiform will do you fine for sources covering those periods.

The language barrier is the greatest challenge. I'm Indian and I'd love to be a scholar in ancient Indian history but it's such a difficult task because I'd need to learn Kharosthi Sanskrit just as a basic requirement. Having to master obscure languages from thousands of years ago just to get started is tough.

On the other hand you can cover Roman history so easily because so much of it has been translated and besides Latin is not difficult to learn since it uses the exact same alphabet as English, and since there's no shortage of places you can go to learn Latin.

Also at summer school this January I took an undergraduate class on ancient Egypt & west Asia and it entirely focused on the African and Achaemenid periods. The only European bit was the Persian invasions of Greece and the life of Alexander.
 

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
18,468
Reputation
7,451
Daps
91,142
I DON'T BELIEVE IN DISTURBING REMAINS FOR SATISFYING OUR CURIOSITY. AT BARE MINIMUM THEY SHOULD RETURN THEM TO REST AFTER ANY STUDIES ARE CONDUCTED. PUTTING THEIR REMAINS ON DISPLAY IN A GLASS CASE FOR ALL TO SEE IS DISRESPECTFUL TO ME.
I agree, even more when you're not a descendent of the people you unearth.


I would love for them to live stream the opening. (Normally I hate unboxing vids)
:dead:
 

GodsPerspective

Superstar
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
3,378
Reputation
930
Daps
13,120
It is a little more accessible and easier to focus on Achaemenid and Ptolemaic Egypt because you don't have to go to the trouble of learning hieroglyphics. Ancient Greek and cuneiform will do you fine for sources covering those periods.

The language barrier is the greatest challenge. I'm Indian and I'd love to be a scholar in ancient Indian history but it's such a difficult task because I'd need to learn Kharosthi Sanskrit just as a basic requirement. Having to master obscure languages from thousands of years ago just to get started is tough.

On the other hand you can cover Roman history so easily because so much of it has been translated and besides Latin is not difficult to learn since it uses the exact same alphabet as English, and since there's no shortage of places you can go to learn Latin.

Also at summer school this January I took an undergraduate class on ancient Egypt & west Asia and it entirely focused on the African and Achaemenid periods. The only European bit was the Persian invasions of Greece and the life of Alexander.
What can you tell us about the origins of ancient Egypt and it's original inhabitants before the influx of invaders?
 
Top