Md. commission overturns approval for contested programs at Hopkins, Stevenson
September 22, 2023
The Maryland Higher Education Commission has rejected proposed doctoral programs at Johns Hopkins University and Stevenson University amid objections from two schools, including one of the state’s historically Black institutions.
The University of Maryland Eastern Shore, an HBCU, and the University of Maryland, Baltimore, both contested the proposals for doctor of physical therapy programs, saying they would be “unreasonably duplicative” and harm the schools and their students.
The commission’s votes overturned previous approvals from Emily Dow, assistant secretary for the Maryland Higher Education Commission.
“While we had hoped for a different outcome, we respect the commission’s decision. Going forward, we will continue to work with our higher education colleagues throughout the state to support Maryland’s students,” John Buettner, vice president for marketing and digital communications at Stevenson, said in a statement.
A spokeswoman for Johns Hopkins did not respond to an email request for comment in time for the publication of this article.
Decisions from the commission are final and cannot be appealed, according to letters sent to university presidents at Johns Hopkins, Stevenson, UMES and UMB.
As private institutions, Johns Hopkins and Stevenson can still move forward with their proposed programs, but doing so could jeopardize their funding from the state legislature. Public schools cannot implement a program without the commission’s approval.
The commission’s
vote on Stevenson’s proposal was a “re-do” of an April vote, in which members also denied approval for the program.
Commission Chair Catherine “Cassie” Motz has said the revote was prompted by recent guidance from the Office of the Attorney General, which stated that a formal action requires a vote of a majority of the commission rather than just a majority of those present.
The commission has 11 members and one vacancy, as state law allows for 12. At least six votes are required for the commission to take a formal action, according to the attorney general’s guidance.
The commission didn’t reach the threshold when it denied approval for Stevenson’s program in April, so that vote was of no legal effect, Motz said.
The Office of the Attorney General
issued the guidance after the commission voted with seven members present to approve a contested Towson University program. Towson
has since withdrawn its proposal.
With nine commissioners present for last week’s closed-session revote on Stevenson’s proposal, seven voted against approval, one voted for it and one abstained.
The commission determined that Stevenson’s proposed program would have been unreasonably duplicative of offerings at UMES and UMB and would have caused demonstrable harm, particularly to the institutions’ ability to secure clinical placements necessary for students to complete their programs.
Of the eight commissioners present for
the closed-session vote on Johns Hopkins’s proposal, six voted against approval and two voted for it. The commission ruled that the program would have hindered faculty recruitment and clinical site placement at UMES and UMB.
The two commissioners who voted for approving Johns Hopkins’s proposal, including Motz, argued that the school’s pledge to provide clinical placements in its own health system — The Johns Hopkins Health System Corp. — for all physical therapy doctoral students would’ve prevented harm to UMES and UMB.
The dissenting commissioners also felt that Johns Hopkins’s program would’ve attracted students from outside the state and boosted Maryland’s standing in the physical therapy field. They argued that Pennsylvania, with 21 doctor of physical therapy programs, and Virginia, with 10, have a market advantage.
State lawmakers, university presidents, program directors and Maryland’s top higher education official, Secretary Sanjay Rai, have been tasked with recommending ways for the state to reform how it reviews degree program proposals.
Motz has said that, to improve,
the state must ensure that prospective students have “as many 21st century, cutting-edge programs available to them in Maryland as possible.”
She said the commission should help colleges and universities increase their program offerings to better compete with neighboring states, while still honoring a $577 million settlement awarded to historically Black colleges and universities, which concluded a 15-year lawsuit alleging the state underfunded its four HBCUs for decades. Maryland is a net exporter of college-bound high school graduates, and in 2020 the number of students who left the state to pursue a higher education was more than double the number of students who went to the state, according to the U.S. Department of Education.
The legislative work group is expected to issue its recommendations in December.
Until then, there will likely be a break from review hearings, which follows a memo from Motz and Rai that called for schools to take a voluntary pause on any degree program proposals to which another institution has objected.