oh well this already different than what @Bleed The Freak is saying![]()
oh well this already different than what @Bleed The Freak is saying![]()
Then people would’ve bytched that they redoing Antman 3. All People can’t be happy, you would be fighting off that tribe…. To the death
After what happened in Ant-Man 3 that would have been a much better outcome to do it differently
Maybe…. But you’d be fighting a different war. Take solace in the peace you have now lol
You all are looking at this the wrong way.
All I said was that it seems very similar to the movie that came out in 2007 based upon the trailers. And it's clearly obvious the parallels are similar.
That doesn't mean the movie itself can't be enjoyable. It should have just felt a little bit less predictability of what's about to happen. Hence them putting SS in GOTG3 and FF in Ant-Man 3 would have felt like a changeup
Here's exactly what's going to happen in that movie
- intro
- hero escapades
- change into FF
- disturbance of universe due to flight trip
- SS and Galactus coming
- SS takes sides of FF
- Galactus wins destroying that version of Earth
- wormhole opens to MCU where X-Men and the rest are etc
- after credits.
That's why it would have been so much better to put Silver Surfer inside of Guardians 3 instead of this.
This movie is going to be predictable as all hell.
You're being finessed if you think that's not going to be the general outcome of this movie
"Very similar"? How? Just because the trailer had a scene that paid homage to the Johnny/Surfer scene in the 2007 film? That's not enough lol.You all are looking at this the wrong way.
All I said was that it seems very similar to the movie that came out in 2007 based upon the trailers. And it's clearly obvious the parallels are similar.
That doesn't mean the movie itself can't be enjoyable. It should have just felt a little bit less predictability of what's about to happen. Hence them putting SS in GOTG3 and FF in Ant-Man 3 would have felt like a changeup
Mannnnn the revisionist history that those early 2000s. Fantastic Four movies were good needs to stop. Seeing those movies getting glazed online, just to spite this movie is hilarious. Not saying that those movies didn’t have its moments. Laurence Fishburne’s Silver Surfer, Evan’s Johnny, and Chiklis’s Ben Grimm were dope. But other than that and a few good scenes. Those movies were on the same level as the 2003 Daredevil movie.
To be fair there are valid reasons that people are seeing those movies in a more favorable light now.Not nikkas coddling the Tim Story joints knowing damn well they did not care for those movies.
Like I give a shyt if it’s semi-predictable, just give me a good fukkin’ F4 movie. Lmao.
Yeah, Galactus as a literal cloud still holds up.To be fair there are valid reasons that people are seeing those movies in a more favorable light now.
Back then People complained because, the movies were campy, Dr Doom was inaccurate, Reed's characterization was wrong and they didn't like changes to the source material.
All those problems are the norm now in the MCU. people are used to campiness, and a lot of MCU characters and stories are unrecognizable from the comic book counterparts.
Also they seem to have put money into the special effects back then a lot of stuff still holds up.
Jessica Alba's cleavage in every other shot doesn't hurt either.
To be fair there are valid reasons that people are seeing those movies in a more favorable light now.
Back then People complained because, the movies were campy, Dr Doom was inaccurate, Reed's characterization was wrong and they didn't like changes to the source material.
All those problems are the norm now in the MCU. people are used to campiness, and a lot of MCU characters and stories are unrecognizable from the comic book counterparts.
Also they seem to have put money into the special effects back then a lot of stuff still holds up.
Jessica Alba's cleavage in every other shot doesn't hurt either.