You dont think they would have known if he was drunk at the time they went to his house to investigate?I said straight up I think he was drunk, that's not a proven fact but I can put two and two together (bar district, 3 am, hitting a human being and "not knowing I hit anything")
And he got charged with reckless driving for the hit and run
I guess every post I make has to look identical to get a point across?
Why do you keep calling it a hit & run if it wasn't charged as such?