Marshall Faulk still mad at Patriots over being robbed of Super Bowl by Spygate

[Skip b]

Actually, I just didn't want to insult my own intelligence by partaking in this thread. But here you are using smilies in your OG post essentially giving a tacit endorsement of what Faulk did when he has the entire premise of "Spygate" wrong. You do realize that the Spygate allegations are that the Patriots supposedly had other team's defensive signals....yet you post an article with a guy claiming that they lost because the Pats properly defended some new wrinkles in their OFFENSE and somehow you think you made a salient point. The one person who ever claimed the Patriots taped a practice was found to be lying and was a disgruntled ex-Pats employee.

So yes, I did comment on the thread in general because it's unoriginal, starts from a false premise and is repetitive, it's only not called out because everyone on here (yourself included) hates the Pats, so you stop using the common sense I see you display on a regular basis. It's transparent , and that's really all I have to say in this thread.

2 min drives is easy when you exactly whats coming

 

[Roid Jones]

LOL, stay mad Marshall

Superbowl week and people still want to talk about the Pats. Patriots get the puters' puting'

 

[SubZeroDegrees]

Still mad that Belicheck got away with no suspension for six years of stealing signs while Sean Payton get a year.

 

[954UAlreadyknow]

The Patriots were America's team that year...that was post 9/11 and it was a patriotic win.

Thus, they did it The American Way....they cheated and lied their way to victory.

The patriot way

 

[NYC Rebel]

Actually, I just didn't want to insult my own intelligence by partaking in this thread. But here you are using smilies in your OG post essentially giving a tacit endorsement of what Faulk did when he has the entire premise of "Spygate" wrong. You do realize that the Spygate allegations are that the Patriots supposedly had other team's defensive signals....yet you post an article with a guy claiming that they lost because the Pats properly defended some new wrinkles in their OFFENSE and somehow you think you made a salient point. The one person who ever claimed the Patriots taped a practice was found to be lying and was a disgruntled ex-Pats employee.

So yes, I did comment on the thread in general because it's unoriginal, starts from a false premise and is repetitive, it's only not called out because everyone on here (yourself included) hates the Pats, so you stop using the common sense I see you display on a regular basis. It's transparent , and that's really all I have to say in this thread.

I'm sorry crybaby that is all things Patriots, but I pretty much drop news in the Seum when I see it available.

I really DON'T hate the Pats since I have friends that work there. And on a regular basis, I call football as I see it.

Just stop being a bytch. I hardly partake in any Pat related threads. I read that Marshal was mad and posted it, and now you want to play this psychoanalysis bullshyt.



On the real....fukk you...for real....

 

[Brady-Carter]

We had some plays in the red zone that we hadn’t ran. . . . And a couple of plays on third down that we walked through also . . . And they created a check for it.

The fukk is this idiot talking about. The rams went to the redzone once that game. And scored a TD..

USATODAY.com - Super Bowl XXXVI play-by-play

 

[NYC Rebel]

The fukk is this idiot talking about. The rams went to the redzone once that game. And scored a TD..

USATODAY.com - Super Bowl XXXVI play-by-play

So? He's lying about his experience?

 

[Brady-Carter]

So? He's lying about his experience?

I am saying he is a idiot.

 

[NV-ME]

elisha won


twice.


cant cheat religion

 

[NYC Rebel]

I am saying he is a idiot.

No...you're saying he's a liar.

The guy who actually suited up and played in a a game where you think he's an idiot because you poured through some stats.



Blame Goodell.

 

[mastermind]

you know why this is bullshyt?

The Rams and Patriots played that season, and it was a close game. I think the Rams got the winning touchdown in the 4th quarter.

 

[FreedS[ohh]lave]

Pats could have easily won two mroe super bowls afterwards and were a bounce of the ball away from going to another super bowl the year they lost to the Colts in the afc title game when they had literally guys off the street in their secondary anyone who thinks all theri sucesa is from spygate is an idiot

With that said the Ram game is the one game i question because of how much mroe talented the Rams were but the Pats were physical as hell that year on D and gave a finesse team like the Rams problems even in the regualr season that year

 

[OGmittee]

all i have to say to all of you




keep complaining and b1tching, we already experienced the win and greatness of that pats era

go sit somewhere with Tim Brown u fukkin losers

marshall has always been salty about losing that superbowl he said after the game "sometimes the best team doesnt win"...word? what kind of a man says something like that after losing? he sounds like a child and still does, he'll never be able to get past this and its only hurting HIM in the end...either way

 

[NYC Rebel]

all i have to say to all of you




keep complaining and b1tching, we already experienced the win and greatness of that pats era

go sit somewhere with Tim Brown u fukkin losers

You responding to Marshall Faulk? He doesn't post in here.

 

[yseJ]

You responding to Marshall Faulk? He doesn't post in here.

he wouldnt last a day in the-coli, hed get all butthurt and mad at the world
even if he has a point here, dude has such a sour grapes personality every time he speaks its hilarious...