they opened the floodgates about 10 years ago.....it was obvious where it was going....but even more so was this cartoon in March 2004 Reason Magazine that explained it to me ( I think one page might be missing)
Last edited:
they opened the floodgates about 10 years ago.....it was obvious where it was going....
why should they have adopted?Should have adopted. I realize that they might wanna give birth but cmon
because if you're biologically unable to conceive you might as well raise some kids with no homewhy should they have adopted?
lol based on whos opinion ? yours? stop telling people how to live if it dont concern ubecause if you're biologically unable to conceive you might as well raise some kids with no home
wait so u advocate this?lol based on whos opinion ? yours? stop telling people how to live if it dont concern u
not at all just tired of christians telling people how to livewait so u advocate this?
Who gives a fukk what it's called?This is not Poly-gamy (gametes) = A guy with multiple wives, with none of the wives being lovers, and for the procreation of children
This is not Poly-andry (man) = A woman with multiple husbands
This is Poly - amory (love) = Basically any conception/grouping/arrangement you can come up with (3 women; 2 women, one man; 3 men, 1 woman, etc - its based on whatever time frame is chosen, etc)...... Its many lovers intertwined (no homo) ....... with modern technology and so forth you procreate here too more or less
The Nooklear Family ...