You're REALLY going hard defending this skirt thing breh... *that ain't normal at all.
Anyone who doesn't see what's going on is a part of the problem. Point blank.
Last edited:
Marlon Wayans & Lord Jamar beef over Omar Epps' Skirt! LOL
- Thread starter BlackMajik
- Start date
You're REALLY going hard defending this skirt thing breh... *that ain't normal at all.
Anyone who doesn't see what's going on is a part of the problem. Point blank.
If a thread about a certain topic we stick to the topic. We talking about nikkas in skirts because it is a thread about nikkas in skirts. When it is a thread about the Trayvon situation, we talk about the Trayvon situation. It is a deflection tactic. Just like those CACs that support Zimmerman and hear an argument they can't counter from Trayvon supporters and then go to "Well, what about Chicago", deflection tactic
Then by all means let's talk about nikkas in skirts. So I ask you once again, who is this nikka harming by wearing a skirt? You have to have a reason. Surely you do?
Yep, and everybody was wearing sequins and all types of faggy shyt then.
I'm not complaining. My point is, "rich people and hipsters" are not going to be the only dudes dressing like this. Just like "rich people and hipsters" werent the only people dressing like Mike. Or Tupac. Or Mase n Puff Daddy. Etc. etc.
I am kinda
as to why you are so pro "men in skirts" though. Not implying youre gay or whatever but it just seems like a weird cause to take up 
"what about men who wear kilts, how is this any different"
You're starting to troll because you have no legitimate argument. What the man in the quote you were replying to and what Omar is wearing is like night and day.
why would Irish boys get confused about something that's a part of their culture and has been for hundreds of years.
if a young Black boy that grows up in a culture where they're only used to seeing women wear skirts and know skirts to be a part of a woman's attire and not a mans, then, YES, they would get confused?
how is this so hard to grasp.
skirts are not a part of a males wardrobe in western culture, WE DO NOT LIVE IN SCOTLAND OR AFRICA.
I'm not arguing anything, it's plain as day that Omar Epps was wearing a leather skirt and NOT a traditional kilt or African garment.
what's there to argue about?
Mind you, its the older generation that's Tupac's age that are on this shyt.
They are attacking masculinity as you know it. No more players and Hard on Hoes, just a bunch of simps wearing dresses and bragging about superficial shyt.
Ronnie Lott
#49erGang
the levels that some nikkaz are willing to go to defend this shyt, is simply 
you got dudes bringing up traditional african, irish, scottish garb and trying to compare it to Omar Epps, Kanye, asap rocky wearing skirts
you got dudes bringing up traditional african, irish, scottish garb and trying to compare it to Omar Epps, Kanye, asap rocky wearing skirts
Ronnie Lott
#49erGang
would u let your 10 year old son wear a short leather mini skirt to school
why would Irish boys get confused about something that's a part of their culture and has been for hundreds of years.
if a young Black boy that grows up in a culture where they're only used to seeing women wear skirts and know skirts to be a part of a woman's attire and not a mans, then, YES, they would get confused?
how is this so hard to grasp.
skirts are not a part of a males wardrobe in western culture, WE DO NOT LIVE IN SCOTLAND OR AFRICA.
It's like that isn't registering in these guys brains at all.
How does one even get to the point of defending blatantly homosexual fashion? Especially gay fashion being worn by supposedly heterosexual men? AND TO THE BLACK COMMUNITY NONETHELESS!
Because you're debating with homosexuals/bisexual men pretending to be straight on www.thecoli.com
Or men that just grew up without a father so they're basically lost.
LA Fisher
Banned
Let's pretend that black kids weren't wearing 4 XL tees that looked like dresses just a few years ago brehs
a few years back when I started seeing this shyt happen I used to say, "nah, Black men won't go for this shyt", now I'm sitting here feeling like a damn fool everytime I argue with a Black man defending this foolishness.
the fact that they keep bringing up kilts and other traditional garments that have NOTHING to do with a nikka in America wearing a leather skirt is just
in 10 years these nikkas will be bragging about sucking dikk and still claiming to be straight.
this is a small window to things to come.
I am breh. Because I hate this sheep mentality. I'm trying to encourage critical thinking. I'm challenging the people in this thread because I see holes in their arguments and I'm the type of dude that can't just let it go. If their arguments were intelligent I wouldn't be going as hard. But their arguments aren't intelligent, they are emotional appeals built on shaky anecdotal evidence if that.
If you can't intelligently defend your beliefs then your beliefs are worthless. Point Blank.
This fake outrage is the result of nikkas being told the "gay agenda" is a real thing, and them believing it with no evidence. nikkas are rejecting this because this is something that "nikkas don't do" like we're a monolith or something.
Why can't I ask questions? Why do I have to think and feel and act just like the next nikka? I'm not just going to believe something "just because" I want to be convinced. And y'all haven't convinced me.
So are you going to intelligently tell me "what's going on" or can't you?