malbaker86
Gators
20 years is not the sentence for that crime.
she shoulda taken the plea deal and she would have been out
20 years is not the sentence for that crime.
she shoulda taken the plea deal and she would have been out
FOH, look at the large picture. In Florida, they make you plea or take the verdict, a plea is a admission of guilt. Even if u innocent , you either going to take a plea deal from the state which in reality is a conviction or you going take the judge's verdict
perhaps. but what if that bullet struck someone? it was dangerously reckless and she should be punished for it.
What if you hit someone because your going 90 in a 45 mph zone. Should you go to prison for speeding?perhaps. but what if that bullet struck someone? it was dangerously reckless and she should be punished for it.
Her plea was as low as two to three years and she wasn't going to serve that whole time either. And she is guilty of firing the shot AT him, not in the air so she is guily in that regards. She didn't deserve 20, but she wasn't innocent like we've been led to believe.
so yall think she should be allowed to fire a warning shot when in an argument with her husband?
The chick ran out the house to HER CAR, came back in and fired a "warning" shot.
perhaps. but what if that bullet struck someone? it was dangerously reckless and she should be punished for it.
20 years is excessive, but some people here are trying to make her out to be a martyr when it looks like she's a crazy bytch with a short temper.so convictions should be based on "what ifs" instead of what actually happened? i mean she broke the law mos def but 20 years for firing a warning shot?