Margot Robbie looks debated on Twitter

Rate Margot Robbie

  • 6

    Votes: 14 8.0%
  • 7

    Votes: 31 17.6%
  • 8

    Votes: 67 38.1%
  • 10

    Votes: 26 14.8%
  • 9

    Votes: 38 21.6%

  • Total voters
    176

Supa

Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
19,815
Reputation
6,980
Daps
109,276
Reppin
NULL
On-Topic:


Margot was insanely attractive in the Wolf of Wallstreet days.

16740625800036.jpg



To be fair, that movie came out 10 years ago, and she's clearly aged:



margot-robbie-golden-globes-1673423582.jpg


In her hey, I would have EASILY given her an 8.5, and I'm an extremely hard grader, because I'm a facecard dude.

She's older and her face has more lines now, so she's dropped to somewhere in the 7-7.5 range, which is still a fantastic score, and is not what MID means.

A mid woman is a 5. She's not mid, she's above average facially. Still got one of the best smiles in the game, facts:

celebrity-smile.jpg

This is not an 8.5 :unimpressed:

margot-robbie-looks-amazing-in-a-bikini-as-she-enjoys-a-relaxing-day-with-her-husband-in-puerto-vallarta-mexico-150621_3.jpg


I'm a facecard dude too but having no body means she's not sexually attractive. Ain't no way you see a woman in the pic above for the first time and rate her that high.

The face ain't mid but the body definitely is. It's below mid but since most women today are fat I'll grade on a curve.
 

Th3Birdman

Rookie of The Year
Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
3,924
Reputation
2,198
Daps
11,997
Reppin
Los Angeles
This is not an 8.5 :unimpressed:

margot-robbie-looks-amazing-in-a-bikini-as-she-enjoys-a-relaxing-day-with-her-husband-in-puerto-vallarta-mexico-150621_3.jpg


I'm a facecard dude too but having no body means she's not sexually attractive. Ain't no way you see a woman in the pic above for the first time and rate her that high.

The face ain't mid but the body definitely is. It's below mid but since most women today are fat I'll grade on a curve.

The number scale ain't ever been about bodies. I don't know why y'all insist on this lie. That's why we have the term butterface, because a butterface can't ever place high on the number scale. They are strictly relegated to smash and dash only.


The scale is literally for beauty.
 

Shadow King

Quiet N***a Loud Choppa
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
41,518
Reputation
3,084
Daps
84,491
Reppin
Hometown of Cherokee at Law
The number scale ain't ever been about bodies. I don't know why y'all insist on this lie. That's why we have the term butterface, because a butterface can't ever place high on the number scale. They are strictly relegated to smash and dash only.


The scale is literally for beauty.
Both play a factor.
 

RennisDeynolds

I am untethered and my rage knows no bounds!
Joined
Feb 2, 2017
Messages
35,304
Reputation
4,896
Daps
103,059
Reppin
Paddys Pub
Jamie Presley was hot in her prime

No doubt about that

But that time has passed

Jamie Presley was the appetizer and Margot Robbie is the main dish! :ohlawd:

Nah Margot peaked at the gate. Now all these twitter manosphere bozos talking about she's ugly is a joke

But this is one snoozefest of a bytch as celebs go
 

Contrefaire

Superstar
Joined
Oct 31, 2017
Messages
4,230
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,504
Reppin
West Coast
She's not my type but there exists no universe in which I'd ever call her "mid". Other than not being a literal CHILD, she's pretty much the embodiment of the White European beauty standard to a tee.

The weirdos calling her ugly/mid are either "pointy elbows" level basement dwellers or pedos angry that she doesn't look and isn't 14 anymore.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2014
Messages
250,599
Reputation
48,685
Daps
544,976
Nah Margot peaked at the gate. Now all these twitter manosphere bozos talking about she's ugly is a joke

But this is one snoozefest of a bytch as celebs go


Y’all tripping with this “she peaked already”

The woman is 33 years old

If she had peaked already, she wouldn’t have gotten the Barbie role :sas1:
 

Supa

Veteran
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
19,815
Reputation
6,980
Daps
109,276
Reppin
NULL
The number scale ain't ever been about bodies. I don't know why y'all insist on this lie. That's why we have the term butterface, because a butterface can't ever place high on the number scale. They are strictly relegated to smash and dash only.


The scale is literally for beauty.

No it's not.

If you just say a woman is an 8-10 I'm going to assume the face and body are great. That's overall beauty.

If you say 6-7 than that's usually when you need to specify that something is lacking. If you think Margot Robbie is an 8 facially and the body is a 5 than average that out/round up to a 7.
 

Shadow King

Quiet N***a Loud Choppa
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
41,518
Reputation
3,084
Daps
84,491
Reppin
Hometown of Cherokee at Law
She's not my type but there exists no universe in which I'd ever call her "mid". Other than not being a literal CHILD, she's pretty much the embodiment of the White European beauty standard to a tee.

The weirdos calling her ugly/mid are either "pointy elbows" level basement dwellers or pedos angry that she doesn't look and isn't 14 anymore.
When did Margot Robbie ever look 14? :dwillhuh:
 
Top