Man Thinks He a Dog, Should Liberals Start A part Dog Movement like Transexual movements????

[sun raw]

Literally nothing in this post makes any sense. I am concerned for your own safety completing everyday tasks.

The appropriate response to your nonsense is more nonsense. Is someone forcing you, at gunpoint, to have sex with a man?

...Are you forcing people to have sex with dogs at gunpoint?

 

[TLOL is back]

The appropriate response to your nonsense is more nonsense. Is someone forcing you, at gunpoint, to have sex with a man?

...Are you forcing people to have sex with dogs at gunpoint?

No, both irrelevant questions.

I suppose it makes sense you think I was stating nonsense, since you failed to comprehend the actual message.

 

[sun raw]

No, both irrelevant questions.

I suppose it makes sense you think I was stating nonsense, since you failed to comprehend the actual message.

The message appears to be that forcing people to have sex with people they don't want would be disturbing. Because it's rape.

 

[TLOL is back]

The message appears to be that forcing people to have sex with people they don't want would be disturbing. Because it's rape.

While I certainly agree with those sentiments, it is almost shocking that you somehow how you derived that as the message of my original post.

 

[sun raw]

While I certainly agree with those sentiments, it is almost shocking that you somehow how you derived that as the message of my original post.

Here I'll help.

You think:

A gay man fukking a gay man, consensually = a person fukking a dog, when in reality it is not. In an attempt to illustrate this, you came up with a scenario in which someone is forced, that is, non-consensually, at gunpoint to have sex with a man or with a dog, stating that both instances would be equally disturbing. Which, no shyt, it would be, someone is being forced with threat of violence to have sex.

Now back to the consensual gay sex = dog fukking thing. Dogs, as non-human living beings, that is, as animals, are incapable of consent. Additionally, fukking a dog would most definitely cause some sort of damage to the dog's well being or your own. Additionally, a dog is not human, don't fukk dogs, it is nothing like two humans (consensually) fukking each other.

 

[TLOL is back]

Here I'll help.

You think:

A gay man fukking a gay man, consensually = a person fukking a dog, when in reality it is not. In an attempt to illustrate this, you came up with a scenario in which someone is forced, that is, non-consensually, at gunpoint to have sex with a man or with a dog, stating that both instances would be equally disturbing. Which, no shyt, it would be, someone is being forced with threat of violence to have sex.

Now back to the consensual gay sex = dog fukking thing. Dogs, as non-human living beings, that is, as animals, are incapable of consent. Additionally, fukking a dog would most definitely cause some sort of damage to the dog's well being or your own. Additionally, a dog is not human, don't fukk dogs, it is nothing like two humans (consensually) fukking each other.

Oh, now I see where you went wrong.

 

[sun raw]

Oh, now I see where you went wrong.

Nah my mistake was assuming you were capable of thought that exceeded that of a 13-year old.

Respectfully, of course.

 

[TLOL is back]

Nah my mistake was assuming you were capable of thought that exceeded that of a 13-year old.

Respectfully, of course.

Funny when I was 13 I learned to ask for clarification, rather than assume, what someone's stance is before reacting to it. I see as an adult you still have not learned to do that

 

[ltheghost]

The fact that a man is human doesn't really make it less disgusting does it? If someone put a gun to your head and asked you to fukk a man, would it really make you less disturbed than if someone put a gun to your head and asked you to fukk a dog?

I'm not going to answer this. (crazy ass hypothetical) LOL I still can't believe we are talking about fukking a dog.

 

[killacal]

@sun raw is so hard hes playing mental hopscotch with himself

 

[TLOL is back]

I'm not going to answer this. (crazy ass hypothetical) LOL I still can't believe we are talking about fukking a dog.

You can't answer it because you know that they are equally

The only difference is, it is not PC to at one, while it is at the other.

 

[sun raw]

@sun raw is so hard hes playing mental hopscotch with himself

Hopscotch is fun, I'm glad I never lost my youthful lust for life.

 

[ltheghost]

You can't answer it because you know that they are equally

The only difference is, it is not PC to at one, while it is at the other.

No they are not equal. They are both nasty but not equal.

 

[killacal]

No they are not equal. They are both nasty but not equal.

so im assuming youd choose a mans anus

 

[ltheghost]

so im assuming youd choose a mans anus

I'm not choosing either. Kill me nikka...I'm not doing any of that shyt.

And since you brehs are so ready to fukk dogs..lol I'm done on this note...

And take this neg nikka for assuming I would choose a man's anus...lol.