Man argues beastatlity laws are unconstitutional

upthere

Rookie
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
221
Reputation
0
Daps
254
Reppin
^
people eat, physically abuse, hunt (for sport:skip:) animals without their consent. People inject steroids into, and experiment on animals. People force animals to participate in sport and competitions, force em to live in unsanitary conditions and have em locked up all without their consent----Ultimately for human pleasure


So if these people wanna :deadhorse: on their own land, who can really say its unfair to the animals without taking all those other abuses into consideration....:manny:


i wonder what peta thinks of this:ohhh:
 

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
21,887
Reputation
4,115
Daps
56,139
Reppin
Run Thru U Like Skattebo
i dont know why everything in this forum has to be so gay. this case hinges on the fact that the law is not based on consent or harm, just on how disgusting it is to fukk animals. many other states dont even bother to have this law on the books so this case is not a sign of moral decay, and pedo laws are based on consent and harm so this case will have no precedent on that. incest is practiced by many biblical characters, if that is a sign of societal downfall, then god intended for the garden of eden to fall off from the start.

it's so demonic, friends.
 

Hiphoplives4eva

Solid Gold Dashikis
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,423
Reputation
3,805
Daps
152,087
Reppin
black love, unity, and music
i dont know why everything in this forum has to be so gay. this case hinges on the fact that the law is not based on consent or harm, just on how disgusting it is to fukk animals. many other states dont even bother to have this law on the books so this case is not a sign of moral decay, and pedo laws are based on consent and harm so this case will have no precedent on that. incest is practiced by many biblical characters, if that is a sign of societal downfall, then god intended for the garden of eden to fall off from the start.

it's so demonic, friends.

Many people feel sodomy is disgusting and should be banned, yet enlightened liberals like yourself castigate those people as being "behind the times" or "primitive."

So are you saying that "disgusting sexual acts" can only be determined by liberals?

I say if you all want to consider sodomy simply an "alternative lifestyle", then incest (sexual relations between two consenting adults) as well as bestiality should also be fair game. Since using the bible as a moral standard is considered "backward thinking", then who are we to tell the donkey fukkers and blood relatives that they can't fukk and get married to their significant others?
 

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
21,887
Reputation
4,115
Daps
56,139
Reppin
Run Thru U Like Skattebo
Many people feel sodomy is disgusting and should be banned, yet enlightened liberals like yourself castigate those people as being "behind the times" or "primitive."

So are you saying that "disgusting sexual acts" can only be determined by liberals?

I say if you all want to consider sodomy simply an "alternative lifestyle", then incest (sexual relations between two consenting adults) as well as bestiality should also be fair game. Since using the bible as a moral standard is considered "backward thinking", then who are we to tell the donkey fukkers and blood relatives that they can't fukk and get married to their significant others?
i actually think it's gross too, especially two dudes, but i also dont care because if it's two consenting adults and they are not butt-banging in the street then it is none of my business, and if it makes them happy then i dont want to go out of my way to try to deny people the pursuit of happiness. that is all american's right, sodomite or non-sodomite.

i also dont like incest, but if it is two consenting adults then whatever. i dont get in their business and dont want to deny them whatever is making them happy either.

bestiality is not between consenting adults. in its capacity to harm and exploit the defenseless, i can logically support laws against these practices, but i think society is grossed out by it more than really caring about the welfare of the animal since people otherwise exploit and abuse animals for food, sport, and fashion. i think bestiality is gross and probably traumatizing to the animal, but so is commercial farming. in light of this, i dont really care whether they prosecute donkey fukkers or not since i know i eat traumatized animals every day and wear their skins as a pair of jordans. i would rather there be a world where perverts arent doing this, but a fukked cow is about as traumatized as a castrated bull or a mother cow seeing her baby turned into veal chops, or a chicken doped up to grow huge and staying stuffed in a cage with its own feces piling up just to get its neck snapped so it can be deep fried at popeye's

but to draw out the differences between you and me, i think law is primarily for preventing harm and meeting out justice after harm is done. i dont think it should be focused on regulating morals and social norms. i would rather people and communities do that in their privacy. so, while i would not support laws keeping gays from getting married, i would support a preacher/rabbi/imam refusing to perform a gay marriage in his/her house of worship. the gay couple would have to go somewhere that supports that lifestyle.
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
18,530
Reputation
4,195
Daps
77,184
Reppin
North Jersey
Animals can't consent? What a dishonest post :what:

I want you to watch this: [start at 1:15]

Horse Humper Bestiality Documentary - YouTube

Maybe Sly's post wasn't clear enough....Maybe I did't clarify what "consent" entitles. A consent is an agreement between two equal standing parties. What's dishonest is assuming a broken/domesticated animal is the same as a wild animal. If presenting yourself was all that was necessary to show consent, its open season on the mentally disabled, disturbed children, and people under the influence. Law and common sense says these ppl can't consent because of their states of mind. If their consent does not apply, why the fukk would an animal's considering the average animal is no more rational than a retard? And Im purposely overlooking the fact that we can't fukking communicate with animals without forcing them into submissive, free will deprived positions.

Seriously, dont talk about this in public because what you're insinuating insane.
 

Soymuscle Mike

Formerly known as Vincenzo Corleone
Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
11,458
Reputation
4,649
Daps
57,075
Reppin
Sweetlake City
Try and post something powerful to sway the direction of the thread. Im not sure what you were hoping to get out of a thread about the legality of donkey sex. demonic friend demonic friend demonic friend etc.

There's nothing to get out of this thread, the only reason I entered was because I was expecting people to make fun of the lawyer's case.

Instead I, again, encountered you and your friends fearing that your gay fantasies will lead to you losing yourself in a world of total anarchy where your lust for men feels so animalistic that you equate beastiality with homosexuality. It's even led to your fear of disgusting women pulling out their filthy breasts in public to feed their children.

Let go of your fear :to:

Your untapped lust will not lead you down a dark path without boundaries. Pregnant women are not your enemy, in fact you will probably find most of them to be your friend.

I do believe in you, but I fear that this is the point where you and your rainbow-friend-brigade claim I'm the gay one even though you're the ones who brought it up...again :wrist:
 

YouMadd?

Chakra Daddy
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,192
Reputation
1,590
Daps
69,856
Reppin
California
I said the same thing, next is pedophilia & incest...its only a matter of time
:snoop:

So if pedophilia and incest was the next on slippery slope of sexual deviance after Homosexuality.. What came before homosexuality? Interracial sex?:manny:
 

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,383
Reputation
-411
Daps
10,406
Maybe Sly's post wasn't clear enough....Maybe I did't clarify what "consent" entitles. A consent is an agreement between two equal standing parties. What's dishonest is assuming a broken/domesticated animal is the same as a wild animal. If presenting yourself was all that was necessary to show consent, its open season on the mentally disabled, disturbed children, and people under the influence. Law and common sense says these ppl can't consent because of their states of mind. If their consent does not apply, why the fukk would an animal's considering the average animal is no more rational than a retard? And Im purposely overlooking the fact that we can't fukking communicate with animals without forcing them into submissive, free will deprived positions.

Seriously, dont talk about this in public because what you're insinuating insane.

Natural instincts like fukking? Consent - Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something. Wouldn't you say the horse mounting her would be consent? Him continually thrusting into her is a an agreement to fukk.

That was a simple concept to grasp. Yet it totally eluded you.

And don't try to tell me some bs on like she forced it to thrust into her.
 

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,383
Reputation
-411
Daps
10,406
So if pedophilia and incest was the next on slippery slope of sexual deviance after Homosexuality.. What came before homosexuality? Interracial sex?:manny:

That's not a sexual deviance :what:

Heterosexual sex of the same species.
 
Top