Making our Pockets Fat again AGAIN PT 2 - Official Gambling Thread

[J Money]

I like Washington -1.5 over Seahawks

Dolphins been playing well but I have Panthers -2.5

Took Vikings +3.5, they should be able to air it out

Patriots should win but im not really feeling that -6.5

Colts +3.5 at home and they're playing very good football

Eagles -3.5 this shouldn't be a close game,

I bet on the Falcons but wouldn't be surprised if they find a way to lose v Jags

 

[SwizzLake]

I like:
Pittsburgh+3.5
Tennessee+7
LA Rams-1
Minnesota+3.5
Cleveland+3.5
Atlanta-2

I don't really like the Titans this week, plus they're missing Aj Brown..I don't like the Rams either beating the Packers in Green Bay, I don't like Minnesota covering that spread against the 49ers in San Francisco.

This week just seems off to me, so I'm just going rely on live-plays

 

[broller]

I don't really like the Titans this week, plus they're missing Aj Brown..I don't like the Rams either beating the Packers in Green Bay, I don't like Minnesota covering that spread against the 49ers in San Francisco.

This week just seems off to me, so I'm just going rely on live-plays

I know everything points to the Patriots winning but, they seem overvalued after their long-winning streak and the Titans seem to do well as underdogs. Underdogs. This reminds me of the Rams game a little bit where people thought that no chance against the high flying Rams and there's no Derrick Henry..

As for the Rams, this year's been really good for playoff revenge teams. I think every one but one has covered in The playoff revenge scenario. Plus, with the Rams public perception being reduced over the last couple weeks, it's telling to me that they are favored after initially opening up as dogs.

From Minnesota, they've been competitive in every game this year. And I think they match up well against the San Francisco defense as their secondary is not that great. San Fran always seem to match up against the Rams defense, but the Vikings defense is quite physical themselves and I think they'll be able to handle the Niners running game. I think the Vikings will take the approach that the Packers did against the Niners on Sunday Night Football, where if they're given any one-on-one man coverage, their receivers are going to dominate the Niners secondary.

 

[prime]

A nikka is done gambling on college sports with Kansas losing to Dayton and Houston not covering vs UConn that's it for college but I have been eating on the NHL and NBA this season

 

[SwizzLake]

I know everything points to the Patriots winning but, they seem overvalued after their long-winning streak and the Titans seem to do well as underdogs. Underdogs. This reminds me of the Rams game a little bit where people thought that no chance against the high flying Rams and there's no Derrick Henry..

As for the Rams, this year's been really good for playoff revenge teams. I think every one but one has covered in The playoff revenge scenario. Plus, with the Rams public perception being reduced over the last couple weeks, it's telling to me that they are favored after initially opening up as dogs.

From Minnesota, they've been competitive in every game this year. And I think they match up well against the San Francisco defense as their secondary is not that great. San Fran always seem to match up against the Rams defense, but the Vikings defense is quite physical themselves and I think they'll be able to handle the Niners running game. I think the Vikings will take the approach that the Packers did against the Niners on Sunday Night Football, where if they're given any one-on-one man coverage, their receivers are going to dominate the Niners secondary.

You also have to consider the game-play inside dome stadiums are different from outdoor games, the weather is a factor this weekend, especially in Green Bay.

 

[broller]

You also have to consider the game-play inside dome stadiums are different from outdoor games, the weather is a factor this weekend, especially in Green Bay.

Yeah, I hear that about playing outdoors with the Rams. Though, it'll be easier this time in late November than it was in January last year when they lost the game. They were limited by Jared Goff last year and the Packers offense was moving better last year. This year, they seem a bit more anemic though they seem to get right last week against the Vikings. I don't know, I just like the Rams in this spot after losing two straight and coming off their bye. I'm sure they've gotten Odell more assimilated into their offense now and I think he's going to have a big game. We'll see though, it's a tough game to pick.

 

[profound]

Thanks a lot breh. I'll use it for the NFL tomorrow..

I haven’t got it to be valuable for pro sports yet, not in the way it will show me a winner in college sports. For nfl there’s loads of money on each side, I can’t ever get anything clear.

but taking a look this morning I do see there’s more money on the Steelers ML than bengals. Usually favorites dominate the ML and if a dog is well liked it’s dominate solely on the ticket side, not the cash side.

 

[OGBobbyJohnson]

Giants whole receiving core is out

 

[OGBobbyJohnson]

 

[dza]

Steelers ml

 

[broller]

I haven’t got it to be valuable for pro sports yet, not in the way it will show me a winner in college sports. For nfl there’s loads of money on each side, I can’t ever get anything clear.

but taking a look this morning I do see there’s more money on the Steelers ML than bengals. Usually favorites dominate the ML and if a dog is well liked it’s dominate solely on the ticket side, not the cash side.

Alright, I'll use it next week for the conference championship games in college.

Yeah, I'm really liking Pittsburgh as a strong play today.

 

[OGBobbyJohnson]

That New England/Tennessee spread seems too high

 

[broller]

That New England/Tennessee spread seems too high

I agree. Tennessee is going to surprise.

 

[broller]

Giants whole receiving core is out

I think Golladay is going to play.

 

[OGBobbyJohnson]

I’m not touching the ATL/Jax or NY/Hou

Taking Carolina & Phi instead