DetroitEWarren
Veteran
I just woke up.
Yea, you definitely have the right to say that black people need to move flawlessly due to the history of powerful black folks in this country, what you don't have the right to do is criticize somebody who did not violate any type of actual law, unwritten rule (literal married couples are DA and Prosecutors on same cases in this country) or conduct issue. She did absolutely nothing wrong from every drop of information we have.
Did she pay him back in cash? Most likely, but if she didn't, that's still not a conflict of interest in this case. Abd once again, it's not her job to prove she did, it's their job to prove she didn't. I think it's dumb asf for online nikkas to think that people who run law firm can't pay for trips with their own money, and it's no proof either way. They literally can't do anything to prove her wrong, so it's irrelevant. This will definitely lead to her finances being looked at, and if she has been fukking around with funds, then I will say that she needs to be penalized. Period.
Your problem is allowing the media to control the narrative around YOUR mind. Just because everyone is focusing on it means absolutely nothing if it's dismissed and the case continues, which will most likely happen next week. People like YOU are allowing Trump's tactic of public opinion court to work. Pink bytch is doing the same shyt all around the country, has been doing this type of shyt for years, but the people challenging him need to be perfect?
Nygga. fukk that
