Umm......You do know that John Wick was better than The Equalizer right?
no it wasnt
mad max >equalizer> john wick
Umm......You do know that John Wick was better than The Equalizer right?
I thought about that too breh, looking back at Aliens and T2, and other female characters throughout the years like Xena, the girl from the second Riddikk, and others that are slipping my mind right now, etc.. Any of those, I can understand a feminist relating to, and all of those are female characters that I can rock with. I don't recall any of those characters being associated with feminism, yet, I can understand if feminists would identify with them and that would be ok with me. Sh!t I wouldn't have a choice but to be ok with it anyway. Free country. My beef is, with this, beyond simply identifying with it, it's coming off like it is in fact a propaganda piece. From the director, to the consultant, the actors, actresses, critics, Hollywood in general, etc., the whole thing comes off like a conspiracy or elaborate(not to sound like a nut) agenda with multiple participants from various backgrounds. Considering Hollywood style liberalism, it's not a stretch.
Even the premise, with Furiosa rescuing the harem, reminds me of how some arrogant and condescending feminists see themselves as being the savior for females even if those same females don't realize or acknowledge the benefits they've gained as a result of feminism. For the past couple of years since 3rd wave feminism has become the latest fad, it's noteworthy when someone states how/why they're not a feminist, the feminists swoop in like vultures to not only educate them, but to shame them. It's like their own little twisted version of saving the damsel in distress. In some cases they even seek to appropriate women and men for the cause using the argument that if you agree with the textbook definition of feminism, than obviously you're a feminist. Admittedly, if no mention of feminism was ever brought up since this film's buzz picked up, I would have never associated it with feminism. Now since it's a topic, it's almost like the film is tainted to me. I see feminism in the film where it shouldn't be obvious. Almost how feminists see sexism where it's not obvious or even non-existant. Anyways, I'll pass on it.
no it wasnt
mad max >equalizer> john wick
What about go see the movie, make your own opinion and THEN come rambling about such and such supposed feminism. I can stand people who talk shyt when they didn't even study the things they talk about. If back in the days a critic would have said rocky promote patriotism and anti communism you would have pass on it just because?
Your opinion is irrelevant until you go see it and if not just stfu
my only gripes it wasnt violent enough and yall hyped this shyt to much once it got to third act the killings were the same as the first act
still a dope movie tho was very frsh not mad at the coli way better than that action movie yall hyped john wick
as a black man this hurts to say this but this was better than equalizer
think i might take my dad to see this
dont know if good enough to add in blu ray collection
as a rated r movie this still felt pg 13 i need someone nuts to get blown off or head severed i think i could have took my 8 year old daughter see this
lol @ it not being violent enough, I think you're mistaking violence for gore. People have gotten so used to that clinical MPAA-style of rating movies (count the amount of swear words, count the amount of nudity, count the amount of visible wounds, sum it all up) that they're forgetting there's such a thing like atmosphere, and to me the atmosphere of this movie warrants that R-rating more than a John Wick does with its 50+ headshots. And it's because the atmosphere is so strong that Miller can so easily throw aside the concept of 'money shots'. When a guy gets hit by a chainsaw then falls off a rig he doesn't feel to show you his mauled corpse laying in the sand, because you know the guy is toast and showing it tells us nothing we don't already know. All it would do is kill the momentum of the action at hand, and that's exactly where Miller succeeds, because every chase is a devastating barrage of violence that never ceases or slows down until the very chase itself is over, the way it should be.
lol @ it not being violent enough, I think you're mistaking violence for gore. People have gotten so used to that clinical MPAA-style of rating movies (count the amount of swear words, count the amount of nudity, count the amount of visible wounds, sum it all up) that they're forgetting there's such a thing like atmosphere, and to me the atmosphere of this movie warrants that R-rating more than a John Wick does with its 50+ headshots. And it's because the atmosphere is so strong that Miller can so easily throw aside the concept of 'money shots'. When a guy gets hit by a chainsaw then falls off a rig he doesn't feel to show you his mauled corpse laying in the sand, because you know the guy is toast and showing it tells us nothing we don't already know. All it would do is kill the momentum of the action at hand, and that's exactly where Miller succeeds, because every chase is a devastating barrage of violence that never ceases or slows down until the very chase itself is over, the way it should be.
Drive > only god forgives > mad max tho
Reason I said this the main bad guys deaths should be more gorey don't really care about anyone else but the main ones should be sent off in a way
You just wrote two essays about how you're not going to see the movie but I'm the one with a problem.. Right.