LSA Femcels/Divestors...pretending to be white/latina on social media?

[Voice of Reason]

The thing that brehs refuse to acknowledge is that there is a growing sector of militant anti-black-make black females. They have publically available talk rooms where they speak white supremacist rhetoric about black men 24/7, they've got tiktok and YouTube channels with followings of hundreds of thousands to millions, and every discussion based social network quietly agrees with them by the masses and is infested with them. The "regular" black women (and the castrated simps, low iq "it's just the internet", and the lgbtq) are willing to surrender all sense and logic if it means to bring down the black man and his image.

They're willing to architect artificial scenarios to attack YOUR image through the internet, but but but it's just the internet. For the "both sides" brehs, can you pinpoint the equivalent scenario happening in reverse? Making up a scenario? I mean how sinister and hateful do you have to be?

They re mostly foreign non-FBA.

 

[Phitz]

They re mostly foreign non-FBA.

no, you mostly pull them out of your FBA a$$

 

[Ryze]

They re mostly foreign non-FBA.

They're certainly over-represented in that movement. But after observing them for some time, I can conclude that a dangerous amount of them are indeed FBA. The more extreme die black man die types are non-FBA for sure.

 

[Jazzy B.]

BLACK FEMINISM is the GATEWAY to Divestment.

BLACK MEN and WHITE WOMEN become the ENEMY.

The White Man becomes either INVISIBLE or a shapeless entity/institution.

Which allows for a segue into moving into white male spaces and eventual relationships.

 

[Phitz]

They re mostly foreign non-FBA.

ALL of these KKK ring leaders of this movement are FBA, ALL of them

https://www.youtube.com/@ParisMilan

https://www.youtube.com/@CynG

https://www.youtube.com/@ChrissiesWay

https://www.youtube.com/@Christelyn1

Breukelen Bleu​

 

[Mindfield333]

Lmao this reminds me I was in a tiktok live where some chicks were talking about movements that hurt the Black community… I mentioned divestors being a CIA op in the comments because it wasn’t mentioned and some lady, sounding unhinged said it was a gift from Jesus. I was blocked shortly after lol

 

[Mindfield333]

Lmao this reminds me I was in a tiktok live where some chicks were talking about movements that hurt the Black community… I mentioned divestors being a CIA op in the comments because it wasn’t mentioned and some lady, sounding unhinged said it was a gift from Jesus. I was blocked shortly after lol

This happened yesterday on tiktok btw

 

[DrBanneker]

The thing that brehs refuse to acknowledge is that there is a growing sector of militant anti-black-make black females. They have publically available talk rooms where they speak white supremacist rhetoric about black men 24/7, they've got tiktok and YouTube channels with followings of hundreds of thousands to millions, and every discussion based social network quietly agrees with them by the masses and is infested with them. The "regular" black women (and the castrated simps, low iq "it's just the internet", and the lgbtq) are willing to surrender all sense and logic if it means to bring down the black man and his image.

They're willing to architect artificial scenarios to attack YOUR image through the internet, but but but it's just the internet. For the "both sides" brehs, can you pinpoint the equivalent scenario happening in reverse? Making up a scenario? I mean how sinister and hateful do you have to be?

The issue I think is a misunderstanding of size and scope vs. reach and influence.

The militant anti-Black male/divest types are still a small numerical minority, I would wager under 5%, maybe even under 2% of Black women in the US. That is still potentially 100k+ but not the majority at all.

They become an issue if they can garner outsized influence disproportionate to their numbers, aided by the reach of social media. Like many extremist groups, they are isolated in real life, find each other on the Internet, and make noise/do stuff that is big for a small group.

There is a delicate balance. Ignoring them and not refuting their arguments is not wise and lets them quietly grow larger when they will be harder to oppose. However, if we allow their gender warring to shape the boundaries of the discourse between Black men and women, they have won. That is why I oppose the manosphere direct bytch fighting of divestors since it allows them to shape the narrative.

We need to refute their claims, find an alternative narrative that could appeal to disaffected BW (their main recruiting grounds), and then keep it moving. Screaming at Cyn G or Cris all day doesn't help much. Their minds will not change.

 

[KingsOfKings]

They something else on that lil site.

 

[KingsOfKings]

 

[degu9089]

The issue I think is a misunderstanding of size and scope vs. reach and influence.

The militant anti-Black male/divest types are still a small numerical minority, I would wager under 5%, maybe even under 2% of Black women in the US. That is still potentially 100k+ but not the majority at all.

They become an issue if they can garner outsized influence disproportionate to their numbers, aided by the reach of social media. Like many extremist groups, they are isolated in real life, find each other on the Internet, and make noise/do stuff that is big for a small group.

There is a delicate balance. Ignoring them and not refuting their arguments is not wise and lets them quietly grow larger when they will be harder to oppose. However, if we allow their gender warring to shape the boundaries of the discourse between Black men and women, they have won. That is why I oppose the manosphere direct bytch fighting of divestors since it allows them to shape the narrative.

We need to refute their claims, find an alternative narrative that could appeal to disaffected BW (their main recruiting grounds), and then keep it moving. Screaming at Cyn G or Cris all day doesn't help much. Their minds will not change.

What’s wild is hearing divestors talking points from people who don’t know what divestors are. They’ll spout out wild shyt that they absorbed from the internet and believe just cause. But they don’t belong/know about where it came from. No way to fight that level of entrenchment in discourse.

 

[Dance_Like_A_Fiend]

They become an issue if they can garner outsized influence disproportionate to their numbers,

Isn't that what's already happening? That Korean women talking about Passportbros had millions of people viewing her video and over 100k likes and messages from women of different races. Her caption literally made it clear that she was generalizing black men and not one woman in that comment section checked her.

 

[Henri Christophe]

The more extreme die black man die types are non-FBA for sure.

Cope

its 2023 and you nikkas still holding onto that "race loyalty" garbage

Its a myth.

non FBA nikkas keep hoes in check.... I cant say the same for you.

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

I don't who's more insane. Die-vestors/Swirlers? or their male hyena enablers?

 

[Jazzy B.]

The issue I think is a misunderstanding of size and scope vs. reach and influence.

The militant anti-Black male/divest types are still a small numerical minority, I would wager under 5%, maybe even under 2% of Black women in the US. That is still potentially 100k+ but not the majority at all.

They become an issue if they can garner outsized influence disproportionate to their numbers, aided by the reach of social media. Like many extremist groups, they are isolated in real life, find each other on the Internet, and make noise/do stuff that is big for a small group.

There is a delicate balance. Ignoring them and not refuting their arguments is not wise and lets them quietly grow larger when they will be harder to oppose. However, if we allow their gender warring to shape the boundaries of the discourse between Black men and women, they have won. That is why I oppose the manosphere direct bytch fighting of divestors since it allows them to shape the narrative.

We need to refute their claims, find an alternative narrative that could appeal to disaffected BW (their main recruiting grounds), and then keep it moving. Screaming at Cyn G or Cris all day doesn't help much. Their minds will not change.

Divestment is already mainstream breh.

What do you think “Protect Black Women” means?

It’s means PROTECT Black Women FROM… BLACK MEN

This is what Black Feminism ULTIMATELY leads to.