ORDER_66
Rebirth is upon Us 2025
Just fukkin wow, right in your face
I would blow it up with a half ton of dynamite...
Just fukkin wow, right in your face
Propaganda.
I read something over the weekend . It said that the winners get to the tell the story after the war, but in post civil war South, it's been the losers that have gotten to tell the story.
There's a current thread up in this section of the board about Medgar Evers' home becoming a national monument. Some questioned the purpose of that and whether the politicians' effort couldn't be better served fighting for benefits for African Americans. I didn't see it as an either/ or issue. His home becoming a (protected) national monument helps to prevent others from trying to erase his story and the story of what he was fighting against. History matters.
There is no question that tens of thousands of enslaved and free African Americans served with Confederate armies as body servants, laborers, teamsters, hospital workers, and cooks. But were these men “soldiers” in any real sense of the word? Partisans of the “Black Confederate” viewpoint answer in the affirmative, comparing the roles black men played in the Confederate army with analogous job descriptions of modern American soldiers, the labor battalions in the World Wars (especially those who were drafted and thus “forced” into service), and even the menial labor that U.S. Colored Troops units performed during the Civil War.
But were African American laborers in the Confederate army formally enlisted in the army, equipped with uniforms, arms, and accoutrements, and paid for their own work, as were African Americans in the U.S. Army? No. Their status was that of enslaved or marginally free laborers serving in capacities in a military setting analogous to their roles in civilian life. Referring to such men as “soldiers” ignores a fundamental distinction between forced labor and military service.
thanksI'm a member of the Civil War Forum - with mostly all white men and women.
I go there for research purposes and to learn.
It's a few of us on there -- but I guess Im the youngest. It's a few noted Black history scholars on the forum - that have become good friends.
The white people on the forum -- know about slavery -- and what our ancestors went through more than we do.
And they talk about it more than we do as Black people. Daily topics on all things slavery and the CW.
I have to take breaks cause they are openly racist -- and reading some of the comments there will make you find out where they live and pull up.
Its' this White Supremacist from SC who has a whole thread with nothing but old newspaper clippings of news about Black confederates.
It's so sickening -- cause you know they owned and still own the press and can write whatever shyt they want. But, this man continues to post thousands of these old clippings to try to front like they willingly signed up.
how is that still up
Just fukkin wow, right in your face
I am not even outraged by that dumb shyt. I am actually outraged by the fact that American history has omitted the large number of slave rebellions that happened in the USA. From the Stono Rebellion to Nat Turner there is rarely mention of slave rebellions; including possibly the second biggest slave rebellion of all; which was the Second Seminole War.
I am not even outraged by that dumb shyt. I am actually outraged by the fact that American history has omitted the large number of slave rebellions that happened in the USA. From the Stono Rebellion to Nat Turner there is rarely mention of slave rebellions; including possibly the second biggest slave rebellion of all; which was the Second Seminole War.
Really the Gullah wars.
I'm a member of the Civil War Forum - with mostly all white men and women.
@xoxodede, What's the name of that forum? PM if you see fit.